You Cannot Prove Zeus doesn't Exist

Originally posted by Creshosk
And its only your opinion that I was not. 🙄

Are you going to use your own opinion as evidence to support your position? 😖hifty:

Your opinion. {csm]doped[/csm]

Which is your opinion and nothing more. doped

Good job reenforcing your hypocrite status. durup

So your entire defense is "nah. nah, that is just you opinion."?

Since I don't think I could extract a more perfect rebuttal I think I will leave that there to bask a while.

So you want me to show that Thomas the tank exists? hmm

In case you haven't noticed, I'm trying to show that its in the way you define something. Simply defining something incorrectly doesn't make it not exist.

So you're saying that toy is not called Thomas The Tank?[/b]

A fellow poster said one can't prove he doesn't exist, but as we all know:

Thomas the Tank Engine exists as a fictional character in a defined manner and not beyond that. That can be proven. His toy is a toy. That can be proven. An inaccurate definition is nothing more then an inaccurate definition and does not change the existence or non-existence of something.

A picture of a pipe is not a pipe.

Yes, those damned dirty theists and their illogical beliefs. durfist

Well, you chose to say it. And good work, you dealt with the point in a mature, intelligent fashion that does a credit to you. *hehehe*

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
So your entire defense is "nah. nah, that is just you opinion."?

Since I don't think I could extract a more perfect rebuttal I think I will leave that there to bask a while.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
A fellow poster said one can't prove he doesn't exist, but as we all know:

Thomas the Tank Engine exists as a fictional character in a defined manner and not beyond that. That can be proven. His toy is a toy. That can be proven.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
An inaccurate definition is nothing more then an inaccurate definition and does not change the existence or non-existence of something.

Ever.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
A picture of a pipe is not a pipe.

Well, you chose to say it. And good work, you dealt with the point in a mature, intelligent fashion that does a credit to you. *hehehe*

seriously creshosk, werent you the guy that labelled me as a muslim trying to preach christians about their own belief??? and then called me a liar for claiming i was an agnostic/atheist??? lmao. you shud stop talking for the sake of yourself{if not the bleading ears of practically every poster here}

I put dumbasses on ignore

leonheartmm This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here]

And I have not put Imperial nor Kali/spearofdestiny on, cause I don't think they're dumbasses.

Amusing...

Referring way back to the very first post, someone confronted me with that argument yesterday in conversation. I wish I had remembered to say something like "You can't prove Santa Clause doesn't exist." but I handled it relatively admirably.

Technically speaking, nothing can be 'proven' period. Subjective reality makes it literally impossible. So it can be taken even another step beyond deities.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
seriously creshosk, werent you the guy that labelled me as a muslim trying to preach christians about their own belief??? and then called me a liar for claiming i was an agnostic/atheist??? lmao. you shud stop talking for the sake of yourself{if not the bleading ears of practically every poster here}

I wouldnt be suprised he almost accused me of being a sock once.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Amusing...

Referring way back to the very first post, someone confronted me with that argument yesterday in conversation. I wish I had remembered to say something like "You can't prove Santa Clause doesn't exist." but I handled it relatively admirably.

Technically speaking, nothing can be 'proven' period. Subjective reality makes it literally impossible. So it can be taken even another step beyond deities.

Maybe you cant prove that deities exist but the possibility of their existance seems very logical.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Maybe you cant prove that deities exist but the possibility of their existance seems very logical.

Actually, it doesn;t seem that way to me at all. But I suppose that's the crux of the argument. But the burden of proof should be (though usually isn't) on the theists who claim a belief in something beyond that which we can see, measure, experience, etc.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Actually, it doesn;t seem that way to me at all. But I suppose that's the crux of the argument. But the burden of proof should be (though usually isn't) on the theists who claim a belief in something beyond that which we can see, measure, experience, etc.

That's exactly what I've been saying, but a certain Creshock doesn't see that.

Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
That's exactly what I've been saying, but a certain [b]Creshock doesn't see that. [/B]

I understand exactly what you're saying. You are the one who doesn't get what I am saying.

And could you at least try to spell my name right when you attempt to insult me, Spear?

Originally posted by Creshosk
Repeating that horse shit of me not understanding over and over doesn't make it true.

I understand exactly what you're saying. You are the one who doesn't get what I am saying.

And could you at least try to spell my name right when you attempt to insult me, Spear?

SSSSHHHH...Be Quiet

Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
SSSSHHHH...Be Quiet

Originally posted by Creshosk
Uh huh... that's a great argument. 🙄 how long did you rack your brain to come up with that one?

Shhh......

Some how I knew you tell me to shut up again... guess you're out of arguments then? 🙄

Originally posted by Creshosk
Some how I knew you tell me to shut up again... guess you're out of arguments then? 🙄

You need to Meditate to calm your mind. When you can address myself and others in a non antagonizing manner, we will take you seriously.

Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
You need to Meditate to calm your mind. When you can address myself and others in a non antagonizing manner, we will take you seriously.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Truth hurts doesn't it? sly

As this pretty much sums it up:

I certainly hope you didn't miss the sarcasm. 🙄

Originally posted by Creshosk
If you were to look up hypocrite in the dictionary there'd be a picture of your big oily gay penis... sorry, had to say it.

😆

I find your anger amuzing and quite entertaining. 👆

You must be like 15 years old !

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
As this pretty much sums it up:

Your opinion of my contribution to this thread is nothing more than an opinion.

You don't like how I was presenting my points so you made a hypocrite of yourself.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Oh I didn't. Doesn't change things though.

Your opinion of my contribution to this thread is nothing more than an opinion.

You don't like how I was presenting my points so you made a hypocrite of yourself.

Please...just be quiet...your completely derailing the thread 😆

Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
😆

I find your anger amuzing and quite entertaining. 👆

You must be like 15 years old !

Seriously is this all you have left? I called you on this thread being a soapbox, and this is how you choose to cry about it?

Did you see any of the humor in the last post? I left it open to correct which definition (the subject of the hidden text) would be next to. and instead you choose to project your own anger upon me to further your attacks on me?