Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
from what i heard, the white kid was friends with one of the guys and heckled one guy for losing a one-on-one fight to a white kid...i don't know if it's the way they (meaning both or either race) handle conflict and resolve conflict that keeps it mostly segragated, if he was friends with one of them, it must not have been that segragated.
...and assaulting a "heckler" is still a crime.
What?
Originally posted by Robtard
...and assaulting a "heckler" is still a crime.What?
wow, i am not "for" that kid getting beat up, i hope you can read that much, if you put the mentality in your head that "cc is REALLY DARK OR MIXED-BLACK, AND THEREFORE, SHE THINKS JUST LIKE THEM" then you are going to be wrong about me every time. i've stated this so many times, i do not like racial-group think. and yes, i comment about black CULTURE at one point, but b/c of the problems and attacks that i've had, i realized we aren't in a free speech society, we are in a mafia society, and you can't just speak words, that kid knows that too, words cause some groups to do things....and i'm not stating one group over the other....i was in a church in the south (many years ago), and i commented about the democratic party, the sunday school teacher would always sell his party during sunday school, and i made a comment, and he threatened me, he pulled me to the side & told me i would never find a job in aerospace in jacksonville b/c of what i said. words can cause ppl to lose connections, be blackballed, etc. it's not only racial. and we were in church, it wasn't even a bad statement, i only mentioned jimmy carter and that's when he was upset at me. so some ppl have power to cause another to lose their job; others maynot have that power, but could use physical violence to demonstrate, the only good thing about avoiding violence is the fact that you maybe able to phsycially move forward (but there is also trama or emotional trama with that kind of threat)...so these things aren't good, and if you are suggesting that i am "for" that kind of abuse on that kid or any kid, you don't undersand me at all.
(sorry, i ran out of time to edit the first post above) btw, i'm not a democrat, that's why that entire issue in jacksonville was such an ironic event. and just b/c i'm not a democrat doesn't mean i won't speak up if something is happening to hilary or obama; why? well, b/c we are all Americans first, and politics LAST.
this country was built on a variety of arguments, but the biggest or the one on the top (if you think in terms of hierarchy) is the argument about rebel vs. obedient.
with rebel vs/ obedient, as a nation, we rebelled against the mother country (benefit). yet, those who were obedient to their religion, became very rich, simply b/c the religion required frugal spending, hard work, and family. ironically, there was an inner conflict that mirrored the national issue of independence, and that was the southern slaves and the old south; the old south wanted no part of the union, rebel. and the slaves wanted no part of their masters, rebel (and when i mean slaves, i am not only talking about those from africa, i'm tired that, (and there were plenty of white surfs who couldn't own land, and women couldn't own land) slaves were also native indian and there were slaves brought from china to build the railroads, and there were whites who were forced to work in debtors camp or by virtue of their family name, weren't able to own property, etc. and there were free blacks and indians who had problems with the ability to own property and vote w/o feeling threatened)...all of this stuff was REBEL vs. OBIEDENT. as both parties involved in either rebelling or obeying, feels as if they are rewarded for it.
if you understand that this argument is an ongoing energy in this country, then it makes sense as to why some whites may think a black conservative is weird, or a black/minority person thinking black conservative is strange or a sell out or white-washed. and it would also make sense why there are whites/blacks (vis versa, order of b/w doesn't matter) who are for rebellion at any means, just for the sake of it, b/c both think that it was beneficial, as a nation to escape being over taxed, and as a country when it came to slavery. and there are those who think that obedience offers the benefit, so there are both blacks/whites who think that any black rebel or white rebel are troublesome, meaning, there is not value to rebel, yet, that's what afforded this country it's independence, and that's what afforded the freedom of a slave-caste. Not only that, obedience seemed to reward the family and finances, so, there are those who would question a black/minority for not following a more conservative route which is beneficial to society as far as family values and finances as far as being conservative in spending and working hard. And again, the rebels wonder why would a white person be involved with such as strong since of control, as if they are putting themselves in a slave like system, in order to have fringe benefits, when they wouldn't want to be part of the mother-england's version of control, so we go around and around.
and there is another issue, if you think of algebra as a bunch of terms, and each terms are related to social issues, so, let's take race, race is a term, but depending on the person, that term may equal to zero, meaning, it's not important to them, and if someone wanted to control them, they would need to think outside of race, and since that's more sophisticated, most systems of control (on any level and in any racial group think) would prefer us to think in terms of "race", as it's simple to control ppl after that point.
so, here's an example of terms in algebra: (just for a quick review: everything in between the + sign is a term)
xy+zab+ab+Xyb+yba=C_sub1 or CURRENT SOCIAL ISSUE FOR PERSON or GROUP
if xy= race, and race doesn't matter, the new equation is:
zab+ab+Xyb+yba=C_sub2 or CURRENT SOCIAL ISSUE FOR PERSON or GROUP
if you want to control that person, or balance both equations, you now have to figure a way to control or amplify those other terms (how can we get C_sub1=C_sub2). get it?
Originally posted by mighty adam
... so what are you trying to say? i don't knoe fotns are too many others on this forum but i do you race plays a big part in how you get treated here in the usa.
Yeah, like when you're black you get privileges, specific scholarships, Affirmative Action and handouts.
And when you're white you get "hate crime" tacked on to your charge if you ever commit a crime and if your a celebrity you better watch what you say unless you want to be branded a racist and be fired from your job, unless of course your black..then you're just a freedom fighter.
Originally posted by Robtard
...and assaulting a "heckler" is still a crime.What?
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
wow, i am not "for" that kid getting beat up, i hope you can read that much, if you put the mentality in your head that "cc is REALLY DARK OR MIXED-BLACK, AND THEREFORE, SHE THINKS JUST LIKE THEM" then you are going to be wrong about me every time. i've stated this so many times, i do not like racial-group think. and yes, i comment about black CULTURE at one point, but b/c of the problems and attacks that i've had, i realized we aren't in a free speech society, we are in a mafia society, and you can't just speak words, that kid knows that too, words cause some groups to do things....and i'm not stating one group over the other....i was in a church in the south (many years ago), and i commented about the democratic party, the sunday school teacher would always sell his party during sunday school, and i made a comment, and he threatened me, he pulled me to the side & told me i would never find a job in aerospace in jacksonville b/c of what i said. words can cause ppl to lose connections, be blackballed, etc. it's not only racial. and we were in church, it wasn't even a bad statement, i only mentioned jimmy carter and that's when he was upset at me. so some ppl have power to cause another to lose their job; others maynot have that power, but could use physical violence to demonstrate, the only good thing about avoiding violence is the fact that you maybe able to phsycially move forward (but there is also trama or emotional trama with that kind of threat)...so these things aren't good, and if you are suggesting that i am "for" that kind of abuse on that kid or any kid, you don't undersand me at all.(sorry, i ran out of time to edit the first post above) btw, i'm not a democrat, that's why that entire issue in jacksonville was such an ironic event. and just b/c i'm not a democrat doesn't mean i won't speak up if something is happening to hilary or obama; why? well, b/c we are all Americans first, and politics LAST.
this country was built on a variety of arguments, but the biggest or the one on the top (if you think in terms of hierarchy) is the argument about rebel vs. obedient.
with rebel vs/ obedient, as a nation, we rebelled against the mother country (benefit). yet, those who were obedient to their religion, became very rich, simply b/c the religion required frugal spending, hard work, and family. ironically, there was an inner conflict that mirrored the national issue of independence, and that was the southern slaves and the old south; the old south wanted no part of the union, rebel. and the slaves wanted no part of their masters, rebel (and when i mean slaves, i am not only talking about those from africa, i'm tired that, (and there were plenty of white surfs who couldn't own land, and women couldn't own land) slaves were also native indian and there were slaves brought from china to build the railroads, and there were whites who were forced to work in debtors camp or by virtue of their family name, weren't able to own property, etc. and there were free blacks and indians who had problems with the ability to own property and vote w/o feeling threatened)...all of this stuff was REBEL vs. OBIEDENT. as both parties involved in either rebelling or obeying, feels as if they are rewarded for it.
if you understand that this argument is an ongoing energy in this country, then it makes sense as to why some whites may think a black conservative is weird, or a black/minority person thinking black conservative is strange or a sell out or white-washed. and it would also make sense why there are whites/blacks (vis versa, order of b/w doesn't matter) who are for rebellion at any means, just for the sake of it, b/c both think that it was beneficial, as a nation to escape being over taxed, and as a country when it came to slavery. and there are those who think that obedience offers the benefit, so there are both blacks/whites who think that any black rebel or white rebel are troublesome, meaning, there is not value to rebel, yet, that's what afforded this country it's independence, and that's what afforded the freedom of a slave-caste. Not only that, obedience seemed to reward the family and finances, so, there are those who would question a black/minority for not following a more conservative route which is beneficial to society as far as family values and finances as far as being conservative in spending and working hard. And again, the rebels wonder why would a white person be involved with such as strong since of control, as if they are putting themselves in a slave like system, in order to have fringe benefits, when they wouldn't want to be part of the mother-england's version of control, so we go around and around.
and there is another issue, if you think of algebra as a bunch of terms, and each terms are related to social issues, so, let's take race, race is a term, but depending on the person, that term may equal to zero, meaning, it's not important to them, and if someone wanted to control them, they would need to think outside of race, and since that's more sophisticated, most systems of control (on any level and in any racial group think) would prefer us to think in terms of "race", as it's simple to control ppl after that point.
so, here's an example of terms in algebra: (just for a quick review: everything in between the + sign is a term)
xy+zab+ab+Xyb+yba=C_sub1 or CURRENT SOCIAL ISSUE FOR PERSON or GROUP
if xy= race, and race doesn't matter, the new equation is:
zab+ab+Xyb+yba=C_sub2 or CURRENT SOCIAL ISSUE FOR PERSON or GROUP
if you want to control that person, or balance both equations, you now have to figure a way to control or amplify those other terms (how can we get C_sub1=C_sub2). get it?
I like how you managed to make "assaulting a heckler is a crime into"
Something about bow he's a racist living in a mafia controlled society where the only way to "physically move forward" is through violence. But you're not a Democrat. And religious mirrors are controlling obedient white surfers . . .
. . .
Wait, what the ****?
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I like how you managed to make "assaulting a heckler is a crime into"Something about bow he's a racist living in a mafia controlled society where the only way to "physically move forward" is through violence. But you're not a Democrat. And religious mirrors are controlling obedient white surfers . . .
. . .
Wait, what the ****?
Ok, outlines again:
CRIME:It's wrong to beat a kid unconscious, regardless of race. I remember a crime report of a woman who killed her husband b/c he cheated. {Now mind you, marriage doesn't mean ownership, it's means you have the license to sue them for breaking vows and exclusive (sexual) mutual-rights. If you kill your spouse, the courts aren't going to excuse it unless it's to save your own life, b/c you don't OWN your spouse, ownership = possession=right to take the life of a person.} She ran over him, after killing him, she continued to run over him more then 10 times. That kind of action is weighed very heavily in court.
TACTICS: I am stating that there are many ways to control ppl, some use violence and others use blackballing threats, depending on the kind of access and if they can get away with it.
MOTIVATION: Regarding the "mafia", yeah, the mafia reminds me of ppl who are into master/slave games, they value family so much, they kill each other if a person doesn't behave, and they use thug tactics, bully tactics to control those within their clan, yet, rewarding those who follow with gifts/pirks.
POLITICS: The overall issue in this country defaults to politics, and even this Jena-6 issue has "spilled" into the political arena. I am equating our struggle b/t those who "obey" and those who "rebel" as an energy or argument that has been around since the begining of this country.
MYSELF: I don't have to be a democrat to question how things are done, I don't have to be chinese to question china. I don't have to be african to quesiton africa. I'm not Japanese, and I have questioned Japan. I'm not European, I don't have to be Europea to question Europe. Yet, I am American first and formost, and i do question america, we need these questions, we need to reflect.
Racial group think reminds me of the mafia, as they try to take ownership of a person based on surface color, ownership meaning they think they have the right to dictate your life and end your life, and no one outside the surface color questions it b/c they also think in terms of racial-group think. the ones who don't are the ones who will question it, and those are the ones who will figure out what happened. there are whites who care about ppl in general, and may find out something happened where someone died, and will try to help out, but the ones who want that person dead will try to default to race and tell everyone in that racial-mafia to keep quiet, so the crime is never solved. it happens vis versa, if a black person or minority finds a crime or someone who is dead and they are white, and if they cared about ppl in general, but was harrassed b/c they are told to "stay in their place"..what do you think the racial group thinkers are trying to accomplish? censorship, control, dominion, possession, master/slave.
I've stretched and had my No dose.
Let's get it.
Originally posted by Evil Dead
why are people defending these pieces of trash?ok....some white kids did some racist shit.....not funny in the least, but it did not endanger the life of anyone. This is America....you have the right to be ignorant if you so please, you have the right to be biggoted......and yes, you have the right to be outright racist. You have the right to go running down the street calling every black man you see a "n-gger"........they do not have the right to kill or attempt to kill you for it.
Note:
Calling me a "n-gger" (I can tell you say it) is alot like talkin about my Mom. It'll get your ass whipped, but not murdered.
However,
Showing me a "NOOSE" is like showing me your gun.
If I can, I'll kill you before you can round up the posse.
That's instinct.
Originally posted by Evil Dead
in retalliation.......6 guys decide to beat on 1 guy to the brink of death? The intention of these kids is pretty clear. Okay..2 guys beating on the white kid could be concieved as a "fight" (because the one guy was obviously so big of a p-ssy he felt he couldn't beat up the kid himself). When 6 guys get together to pummel one person of any color, the intention is clear. They are not trying to win a fight...to knock someone down and be the last one standing. They are trying to inflict serious injury without giving the other kid a chance to even fight back. They continued to beat the guy after he was unconcious. I believe that makes their intention very clear.......as the guy was unconcious, he couldn't feel pain at that point. Their agenda was not to win a fight or give this guy pain. They wanted him severely injured....and they did it, almost killing him. They deserve what they get.
ENTIRELY FALSE.
The beating happened MONTHS after the noose incident.
Which started the whole thing.
Most life threatening injuries leave you HOSPITALISED for a period of time.
Not released a few hours latter and attending a "Social" function.
As far as them "getting what they deserve",
If you don't know the facts, check youtube or CNN
If you still feel that way then
holler bidack
We'll "talk"
No JUSTICE
Don't SLEEP ❌
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
from what i heard, the white kid was friends with one of the guys and heckled one guy for losing a one-on-one fight to a white kid...
Again, that is NOT what happened.
That "one-on-one" fight happened at a "private" party, and involved a 22 year old White Male attacking an unarmed black Highschool student with a bottle.
Charges were filed on the Highschoolers behalf and he was not permitted to make a statement.
The 22 year old "gentleman" was charged with simple battery and was given probation.
Weeks later at a gas station on the "black" side of town, a White highschool student said he "felt" threatened (not WAS, but FELT)by two black youths at the store.
At which point he went to his Truck and returned with his shotgun.
The boys wrestled the shotgun away from the kid and ran.
They were latter charged with theft of a fire arm, and battery.
Check youtube, and CNN they have the WHOLE story.
No JUSTICE
Don't SLEEP ❌
Originally posted by BlueDMighty
Again, that is NOT what happened.That "one-on-one" fight happened at a "private" party, and involved a 22 year old White Male attacking an unarmed black Highschool student with a bottle.
Charges were filed on the Highschoolers behalf and he was not permitted to make a statement.
The 22 year old "gentleman" was charged with simple battery and was given probation.Weeks later at a gas station on the "black" side of town, a White highschool student said he "felt" threatened (not WAS, but FELT)by two black youths at the store.
At which point he went to his Truck and returned with his shotgun.
The boys wrestled the shotgun away from the kid and ran.
They were latter charged with theft of a fire arm, and battery.
Check youtube, and CNN they have the WHOLE story.
No JUSTICE
Don't SLEEP ❌
what makes me wonder if the black-teen was assaulted with a bottle as a result of talking to a white female? seriously. usually, in teen fights, it's related to uncontrolled sex-hormones, regressive sexual tension is my best guess.
if he was at a majority "white" party, and he's a teen, he's going to be interested in the females (unless he's gay), and teen-boys usually fight over girls, and vise versa. most teen fights are about sexual competition. hence the reason for needing adult supervision b/c teens can't handle emotions and sexual tension with/o violence or uncontrolled issues, simply b/c of peer pressure, drinking, sexual-tension or bravado, etc.
so, maybe he was the object of interest or demonstrated interest, and then that person attacked him, i doubt it was a random attack, it could have been, but i suspect there was a motive for doing so, and i suspect it's related to sex (even if they claim it was over territory or an item/car...the ends-means is about showing it off or displaying it for sexual competition...so when teens of the same race or opposite race fight over 'THINGS', it's usually somehow related to a female).
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
what makes me wonder if the black-teen was assaulted with a bottle as a result of talking to a white female? seriously. usually, in teen fights, it's related to uncontrolled sex-hormones, regressive sexual tension is my best guess.if he was at a majority "white" party, and he's a teen, he's going to be interested in the females (unless he's gay), and teen-boys usually fight over girls, and vise versa. most teen fights are about sexual competition. hence the reason for needing adult supervision b/c teens can't handle emotions and sexual tension with violence or uncontrolled issues, simply b/c of peer pressure, drinking, sexual-tension or bravado, etc.
so, maybe he was the object of interest or demonstrated interest, and then that person attacked him, i doubt it was a random attack, it could have been, but i suspect there was a motive for doing so, and i suspect it's related to sex.
All that is ENTIRELY possible.
But again,
the attacker was 22 years of age and had a bottle.
Originally posted by BlueDMighty
All that is ENTIRELY possible.But again,
the attacker was 22 years of age and had a bottle.
{just curious} the attacker was at a teen party? or was the teen at an adult party?
why is a 22 year old man going to a teen party? sorry, maybe it's still an issue of man+teen in the south, if so, then that's just part of the culture down there....he couldn't have had that many options in females to hit him with a bottle, how much would you like to bet? he was getting no where with the females, that is a reason for someone like him to hit another person, it's not RIGHT, but it's a reason or motive for him hitting a person with an object. jealousy.
i mean, 22 years old is college age, why would a college aged man attend a teen party? he maybe mad b/c he sees it as the teen is "takiing" one of his own, but someone else could say the same about him, why is he dipping below the adult age, he's also taking away from some other male who is younger then him. if this is true, it's all selfishness and jealousy. if he is going to put restrictions about race, someone else can put restrictions on age, it's all a matter of perspective anyway. but most college aged ppl aren't dating ppl in high school.
from what i heard, most in that town aren't educated passed the 6th grade, that education isn't important. maybe that's why they placed blacks or minorities in the school, so at least, ppl will start taking their education seriously, but instead, someone burned down the school, and both races are blaming each other. so, yeah, when ww3 comes, i wouldn't doubt it if our leaders just do an about-face, and go underground, you guys are a bunch of shits (and that's race-aside). deal with it.