Jena 6

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
In the spirit of "racial unity",

I thought it a better position to take than the

"Lock the White kids up too" one.

Query:

If two white kids can be arrested in Alexandria for driving through the crowd of protesters with nooses displayed in their truck and be charged for insighting a riot (amongst other things),

Why haven't charges been brought against the three white kids that hung nooses on school property?

This being such a "tight" community and all, why did those kids have thier expultion lifted and changed to "in-school" suspension by the school board?

Why would the DA take time out of his day to go and threaten the "student" (we knew who he was talking to) body?

Why would a 22 year old man get battery and probation after attacking a High schooler with a bottle (i.e. a deadly weapon)?

Why set bail for the Jena 6 at $90,000, when the average income for the people that live there is $40,000?

If it was just a prank and there was NO ratial tention, how do you explain the "White" tree?

How do you explain them cutting it down, even going so far as to remove the stump?

At the end of the day you have 6 black kids being made an example of.

They're trying to say "Stay in your place"

But I'm saying Mugh**** Dat.

No JUSTICE

Don't SLEEP ❌

Bro dont bother talking to Creshock hes a complete waste of time. I didnt have anything better to do and I was looking through the Wolverine vs Spiderman you got all these people telling him to quit with his logical fallacy and his latin terminology. Save yourself the bother and quit talking to him because it aint going to go anywhere.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Bro dont bother talking to Creshock hes a complete waste of time. I didnt have anything better to do and I was looking through the Wolverine vs Spiderman you got all these people telling him to quit with his logical fallacy and his latin terminology. Save yourself the bother and quit talking to him because it aint going to go anywhere.

Fair enough cousin. 😎

How did the people in GB react to what was happening in the states?

Did you guys see it in the news or did you have to learn about it on-line?

The national media only got involved here when talks of a protest began on the Michael Baisden Radio Show.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
Fair enough cousin. 😎

How did the people in GB react to what was happening in the states?

Did you guys see it in the news or did you have to learn about it on-line?

The national media only got involved here when talks of a protest began on the Michael Baisden Radio Show.

You know what it seems kinda quiet. I heard about it on TV but apart from that it dont get that much coverage. 😬

I swear if I go to America I aint going down South any mother***** calls me boy or *****......im gonna have to try very hard not to get violent.

Originally posted by Alfheim
You know what it seems kinda quiet. I heard about it on TV but apart from that it dont get that much coverage. 😬

I swear if I go to America I aint going down South any mother***** calls me boy or *****......im gonna have to try very hard not to get violent.

True enough 😆

After doing some more background reading I think im even more clearer on what happened here. What ive noticed on this thread is that you have white people complaining about how if a 6 white people jumped a black guy and beat him there would be no end to it. Im starting to think that some of you people are racist because ive noticed there is trend on this forum that whenever something bad happens to black people they try and deny it and make it like its no big deal.

There are people on this forum saying that if black people did this to white people there would be no end of it I dunno man sounds like rubbish to me:

1. Do you realise that there was already racial tension before the incident and that most of the time blacks and white were seperated?

2. Dont you think its ****ed up that the black kid has to ASK permission to sit uunder the tree in the first place. So waitwaitwaitwait....he had to actually ****ing ask permission? I dunno man if you guys used your head alarm bells should have started going off at this point....oh well nevermind if black people were to beat up white you'd never hear the end of it.

3. You are aware that the kids didnt even get expelled? Hey nevermind though its only bits of string. Hey wait aminute where is Lousiana? Oh wait its in the deep south...wait werent lyncings going on there until the 1960s? I dunno man arent the 1960S quite recent? So basically what your ****ing tell me is that its just a bit of string? Get the **** out of here! Hell black people in that area might have relatives that might have been lynched.

4. Before the white kid got beaten up didnt black students get beaten up? Hey its a shame that people get hurt and all that but you know tempers fly.

But you know the best evidence to prove that if black kids beat up a white kid there would be no end to it is this:

5. Why were they put in front of an all white jury?

6. Why was the bail put so high?

Get the **** out of here.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
In the spirit of "racial unity",

I thought it a better position to take than the

"Lock the White kids up too" one.

Query:

If two white kids can be arrested in Alexandria for driving through the crowd of protesters with nooses displayed in their truck and be charged for insighting a riot (amongst other things),

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
Why haven't charges been brought against the three white kids that hung nooses on school property?

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
This being such a "tight" community and all, why did those kids have thier expultion lifted and changed to "in-school" suspension by the school board?

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
Why would the DA take time out of his day to go and threaten the "student" (we knew who he was talking to) body?

Why would a 22 year old man get battery and probation after attacking a High schooler with a bottle (i.e. a deadly weapon)?

Why set bail for the Jena 6 at $90,000, when the average income for the people that live there is $40,000?

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
If it was just a prank and there was NO ratial tention, how do you explain the "White" tree?

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
How do you explain them cutting it down, even going so far as to remove the stump?[/b[]/quote] Idiots who don't know how to deal with problems so they shift blame... Though in this case it seems like a parent taking a toy away from infants who were fighting over it.

[QUOTE=9562828]Originally posted by BlueDMighty
[B]At the end of the day you have 6 black kids being made an example of.

They're trying to say "Stay in your place"

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
But I'm saying Mugh**** Dat.

No JUSTICE

Don't SLEEP ❌

W00t for anarchy. durw00t

Originally posted by Alfheim
After doing some more background reading I think im even more clearer on what happened here. What ive noticed on this thread is that you have white people complaining about how if a 6 white people jumped a black guy and beat him there would be no end to it. Im starting to think that some of you people are racist because ive noticed there is trend on this forum that whenever something bad happens to black people they try and deny it and make it like its no big deal.

You're full of shit... where's this anti-Black trend? If there's any racist B.S. trend in KMC, it's the "whites deserve what they get because of past injustices to blacks" rabble-rant, which we see often in these boards whenever something racial happens.

"Get the **** out of here."

Originally posted by Robtard
You're full of shit... where's this anti-Black trend? If there's any racist B.S. trend in KMC, it's the "whites deserve what they get because of past injustices to blacks" rabble-rant, which we see often in these boards whenever something racial happens.

I never said that though did I..right so that makes me not full of ****

Originally posted by Robtard

"Get the **** out of here."

Your the one who was complaining about how if white kids beat up a black kid there would be no end to it. Your the one with a porblem not me. If you cant even see that its ****ed that the kid had to even ask to sit under the tree in the firstplace then you got a probelm, then you start spouting some crap like "oh if it were white kids onto black it would have been different" when the evidence indicates otherwise.

Also if you say its a piece of string ( I know somebody else said that and not you)either your a racist or an idiot....do I have to break this **** down for you.

Originally posted by Alfheim
I never said that though did I..right so that makes me not full of ****

Ummm... you in fact did say, you 'think there's a trend':

Originally posted by Alfheim
Im starting to think that some of you people are racist because ive noticed there is trend on this forum that whenever something bad happens to black people they try and deny it and make it like its no big deal.

That's certainly not my quote.

Originally posted by Alfheim Your the one who was complaining about how if white kids beat up a black kid there would be no end to it. Your the one with a porblem not me. If you cant even see that its ****ed that the kid had to even ask to sit under the tree in the firstplace then you got a probelm, then you start spouting some crap like "oh if it were white kids onto black it would have been different" when the evidence indicates otherwise.

Also if you say its a piece of string either your a racist or an idiot....do I have to break this **** down for you.

No, I in fact wasn't the one saying that. I said, 'if it was six White kids who beat up a Black kid, they would be charged with assault too, on top of that, it would most likely be labeled a "hate crime".' It was also in direct response to MightyAdams rant about "if it was White kids, they wouldn't be charged at all". Go back and reread what I actually said, knee-jerker.

I agree it's ****ed up, there shouldn't be any "Whites only", "Blacks only", "Inuits only" etc. public places. That is besides the point though, regardless of how much of a racist ******* that kid may or may not have been, assaulting someone is a crime.

No, the noose is insulting, it's purpose is to insult and demean. Besides the point again, though. You don't have the right be physically assault someone over an insult; that is a fact.

Originally posted by Robtard
Ummm... you in fact did say, you think there's a trend:

That's certainly not my quote.

Yeah I did say that. What I didnt say was that white people should be punished for white sins.

Originally posted by Robtard

No, I in fact wasn't the one saying that. I said, 'if it was six White kids who beat up a black kid, they would be charged with assault too, on top of that, it would most likely be labeled a "hate crime".' It was also in direct response to MightyAdams rant about "if it was White kids, they wouldn't be charged at all". Go back and reread what I actually said, knee-jerker.

Well the point im trying to make is that you seem to have implied that basically white people would get treated just the same way as black people, right? But all the evidene in this case indicates that the black people got the short straw. Did any white people get accused of commiting a hate crime, correct me if im wrong.

Originally posted by Robtard

I agree it's ****ed up, there shouldn't be any "whites only", "blacks only", "Inuits only" etc. public places. That is besides the point though, regardless of how much of a racist ******* that kid may or may not have been, assaulting someone is a crime.

No, the noose is insulting, it's purpose is to insult and demean. Besides the point again, though. You don't have the right be physically assault someone over an insult; that is a fact.

Er you do reaslise its not that simple you do realise there were fights before this white kid got beaten up, so its not just a simple matter of beating seombody up over an insult. You do realise that dont you?

Originally posted by Alfheim
Yeah I did say that. What I didnt say was that white people should be punished for white sins.

Well the point im trying to make is that you seem to have implied that basically white people would get treated just the same way as black people, right? But all the evidene in this case indicates that the black people got the short straw. Did any white people get accused of commiting a hate crime, correct me if im wrong.

Er you do reaslise its not that simple you do realise there were fights before this white kid got beaten up, so its not just a simple matter of beating seombody up over an insult. You do realise that dont you?

I never said, you said that.

Yes, I do think if six White kids out a severe beat-down on a Black kid (like in the story), they would face assault charges, because it's an assault. Which crime did they commit, that they should be accused of? Remember, being a racist *******, isn't a crime in itself. If it was, then every time the KKK or the Nation of Islam marches and spouts their racist spiel, they would be arrested and charged with a crime.

Yes, there is/was obvious tension as open racism is/was readily present in Jena. Still, that is besides the point to this assault. This kid was assaulted because he mocked another kid. Did this kid do something illegal? Did he attack someone?

Originally posted by Robtard
I never said, you said that.

My bad.

Originally posted by Robtard

Yes, I do think if six White kids out a severe beat-down on a Black kid (like in the story), they would face assault charges, because it's an assault. Which crime did they commit, that they should be accused of? Remember, being a racist *******, isn't a crime in itself. If it was, then every time the KKK or the Nation of Islam marches and spouts their racist spiel, they would be arrested and charged with a crime.

I dunno man let me break this down. They live in Louisiana, the deep south, not London, not New York, where lynching carried on until the 1960s..and the kids didnt get expelled.....dont try and tell me just because its not a crime that its ok. Why do you think people use the term legal and ethical. Just because something is legal doesnt mean its ethical.

Originally posted by Robtard

Yes, there is/was obvious tension as open racism is/was readily present in Jena. Still, that is besides the point to this assault. This kid was assaulted because he mocked another kid.

Again its not that simple. You're argument is purely academic and it doesnt apply to the real world. You can argue all day that the kid shouldnt have got beaten up but if somebody goes into a Jewish neigbourhood where Jews have been beaten up and starts mocking them.....lets put it this way "im not saying its right but I understand."

Originally posted by Alfheim
My bad.

I dunno man let me break this down. They live in Louisiana, the deep south, not London, not New York, where lynching carried on until the 1960s..and the kids didnt get expelled.....dont try and tell me just because its not a crime that its ok. Why do you think people use the term legal and ethical. Just because something is legal doesnt mean its ethical.

Again its not that simple. You're argument is purely academic and it doesnt apply to the real world. You can argue all day that the kid shouldnt have got beaten up but if somebody goes into a Jewish neigbourhood where Jews have been beaten up and starts mocking them.....lets put it this way "im not saying its right but I understand."

No worries.

I don't agree with it, and I think those kids are racist pieces of shit too. But that isn't a crime in of itself. Do I outright blame those six for assaulting that kid? No, I can't, if I was pushed and pushed, I might snap too, it would still be a crime though; I would be punished.

Sympathising with them is fine, but that still doesn't excuse the crime.

Originally posted by Robtard
No worries.

I don't agree with it, and I think those kids are racist pieces of shit too. But that isn't a crime in of itself. Do I outright blame those six for assaulting that kid? No, I can't, if I was pushed and pushed, I might snap too, it would still be a crime though; I would be punished.

Sympathising with them is fine, but that still doesn't excuse the crime.

Meh.........but im still not sure if white people would get treated the same way as black people. Obvoulsy though I think it might depend on what part of America you live.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Ok fair enough, but im still not sure if white people would get treated the same way as black people. Obvoulsy though I think it might depend on what part of America you live.

In this particular case, I think they would, that's my point. I'm not saying that "Blacks don't have it rough" in certain areas and or occasions. I've been to the South, there's an entirely different side of racism compared to the West Coast.

Why did you edit out "Ok fair enough" and put in "Meh"? Hahahaa.

Originally posted by Creshosk
They should also be charged with attempted vehicular homicide especially if they hurt anyone.

They were also charged with DWI, and possession of a fire arm (shotgun)

Originally posted by Creshosk
Were they able to find exatly who did it? I can think of disorderly conduct as the bare bones minimalist.. Conspiracy to commit murder comes to mind.

Pictures of the three boys shown on CNN's "Judgement in Jena"

Originally posted by Creshosk
Would you want those psychopaths roaming free? At least this way they still have to go to school so for a time, their whereabout will be known.

The expulsion was overturned because it was a "prank"
In school suspension was for THEIR protection.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Usually to make sure that bail cannot be met. It's no different than in other places.. at least around here.

The families of the accused had to mortgage their houses (nearly all 6 families)

Originally posted by Creshosk
Keep in mind that I personally do not aprove of such nonsense. I'm merely objecting to treating this like "just because of the color of their skin, they should have their actions overlooked". IT doesn't mater what color their skin is to me.

If that is indeed true, and NO amount of public outrage could get the authorities to lock up the white kids and treat them just like the black kids ($90,000 bail, 8 moths to a year in jail awaiting sentencing)

Shouldn't the Black kids enjoy the SAME treatment under the law?

Originally posted by Creshosk
And you seem to think that they should be freed after beating someone nearly to death?

I've seen a few fights, been in a few fights, and someone getting knocked out is always a possibility.

This may or may not happen where your from, but from what i've seen
If your boys aren't there, and you go down,

Hit the fetal position, cuz yur gettin that ass stomped.

Color, set, school, country, don't matter.

Your not trying to kill the dude, people that happen by just want to get their lics in, they're not trying to kill the guy.

anybody that has either been jumped, been apart of the jump, or witnessed the jump knows what i mean.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Yes, free criminals (not due to race, but due to actions) just because of their race! Fight the power! Instead of harsher treatment for whites in areas like that, let's have lesser treatments for black criminals!

Slow down buddy. Not everybody NAMED in that charge kicked or hit that dude.

In fact, one of the boys charged has a whiteness (black=don't count) and says he had to look over a rail to see the fight. He was named by a classmate (white=lock'em up) to have been involved.

Ironically enough, Bell, the young man who wasn't involved, and the remaining 4. Were the most vocal at the "sit under" according to classmates and witnesses.

DA came to the school AFTER the "sit under".

One of the boys that was facing 22 years is so young that, legally, his face can't be shown.

This whole thing Stinks.

Originally posted by Robtard
You're full of shit... where's this anti-Black trend? If there's any racist B.S. trend in KMC, it's the "whites deserve what they get because of past injustices to blacks" rabble-rant, which we see often in these boards whenever something racial happens.

"Get the **** out of here."

I'm curious.

Can you give an example?

I see you guys are in a heated debate

Originally posted by Robtard
In this particular case, I think they would, that's my point. I'm not saying that "Blacks don't have it rough" in certain areas and or occasions. I've been to the South, there's an entirely different side of racism compared to the West Coast.

I dunno man. The kid has to ask wether he can sit under the tree, dont alarm bells go off?

Originally posted by Robtard

Why did you edit out "Ok fair enough" and put in "Meh"? Hahahaa.

No comment.
😆

😆

I don't get it 😐