Hi, me again, just another thread about WTC 7

Started by lord xyz7 pages

Originally posted by Fire Ninja
Despite having window, doors, shafts, and [B]A GIANT HOLE FROM THE IMPACT OF THE PLANE? [/B]
The plane only hit one part of the tower. 😐

Originally posted by lord xyz
The plane only hit one part of the tower. 😐

And?

The entire opening of the tower was still exposed.

Ashtar why are you still feeding him? You told me yourself to ignore him which i finally decided to take your advise of,why dont you take your own advise? we Both know that he's not interested in the truth,that it scares him.The more and more you keep feeding him by responding to him like you are, your just playing his game he wants you to play and your falling right into his trap.you've proven him wrong as we both know countless numbers of times.doesnt it ever get boring doing that all the time and having to repeat the same thing again and again to him because he ignores your facts?

To be honest, I just find it funny. Though, I understand where XYZ is coming from, but I disagree with his approach. Your right though, I really have no reason to post anymore. Thanks parker, I'm gonna take leave.

I wanna say something smart, but the shock of the retarded posts is just too much for me. I have no idea how to address them.

You're too smart, Xyz. People like you CAN'T respond to biased rivel like that.

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
You're too smart, Xyz. People like you CAN'T respond to biased rivel like that.

😆 😆

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
You're too smart, Xyz. People like you CAN'T respond to biased rivel like that.
Pathetic.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
😆 😆
Even more pathetic.

I just do not understand the closed enviornment. It does not make sense

Originally posted by lord xyz
Pathetic.

Uh, I wasn't being sarcastic...

Or was I?

To be honest I don't know 😆

Either way, no offense to either of you, I think I was really tired when I said it.

Alright? 😐

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
Uh, I wasn't being sarcastic...

Or was I?

To be honest I don't know 😆

Either way, no offense to either of you, I think I was really tired when I said it.

Alright? 😐

yes, I know you were being sarcastic. You saying it is pathetic as it implies I'm biased, (which I am), and stupid (which I am not). You thinking that and saying it in a stupid way, is pathetic.

Originally posted by lord xyz
yes, I know you were being sarcastic. You saying it is pathetic as it implies I'm biased, (which I am), and stupid (which I am not). You thinking that and saying it in a stupid way, is pathetic.

D'wah?

Originally posted by lord xyz
yes, I know you were being sarcastic. You saying it is pathetic as it implies I'm biased, (which I am), and stupid (which I am not). You thinking that and saying it in a stupid way, is pathetic.

Actually, I wasn't being sarcastic. I was saying that you're trying to argue with a brick wall, and that what they were saying was unintelligible...

OK?

Remember, I have not even decided about the truth of this thread. 😉

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
Actually, I wasn't being sarcastic. I was saying that you're trying to argue with a brick wall, and that what they were saying was unintelligible...

OK?

Remember, I have not even decided about the truth of this thread. 😉

Whatever. I fnd difficulty in interpreting online text.

Whatever caused them to collapse, why did they collapse as though they had been demolished by professionals?

They fell straight down onto themselves, they didn´t fall sideways and wreck a large amount of surrounding buildings, not only one but both buildings. This alone should cause at least a bit of suspicion.

And building 7 collapsed the same way for some reason. And the owner is recorded as saying it was "pulled".

As for the bombs argument, well its fare more feasable than the "missile shot downwards by the helicopters" argument which I read somewhere.

This is an interesting video about the speed of the planes which hit the towers, apparently they would have had to be flying over 500MPH, which isn´t possible at that height.

I'm no aviation expert so don´t take my word for it, watch the video.🙂

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2upl977dsY

http://www.youtube.com/user/bsregistration

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=genghis6199

And, many other accounts are part of the most contraversial 911 subject that even 911 conspiracy theorist will not accept. . .The no plane thoeries. Youtube has taken so many of their vids down and even edit there videos I.E. when you search for this topic, you find different videos.)

Originally posted by Fire Ninja
http://www.youtube.com/user/bsregistration

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=genghis6199

And, many other accounts are part of the most contraversial 911 subject that even 911 conspiracy theorist will not accept. . .The no plane thoeries. Youtube has taken so many of their vids down and even edit there videos I.E. when you search for this topic, you find different videos.)

Yeah. Despite them being seen and recorded, and them not using planes is more ridiculous than Kennedy living.

YouTube video

Originally posted by lord xyz
Yeah. Despite them being seen and recorded, and them not using planes is more ridiculous than Kennedy living.

Research the subject, the comeback.