Ha! A good researcher is one who has researched enough information to know as much of the story to see that a claim as out of place as this is absolutely ridiculous.
It's high unlikliness is also good enough to disregard it, without mention it's stupidity. It's good to be open-minded, but don't be crazy. You can't treat every claim equally. The most likely ones should be treated better than the least likely ones. That's logic.
But, you haven't even researched the subject?! How can what you said even apply to you, you just dismissed it because "It's obviously stupid". Furthermore, "High unlikelyness" what makes it highly unlikely, get me a statistic or some math and then we can go into that tangent. Also, an objective person regards every claim with out personal bias, which you are not even doing. What logic supports your bias, when you haven't even looked into the subject.
guys,dont feed the troll.The more and more you keep feeding the troll the more and more he is laughing at you for taking his bait.He knows perfectly well bombs went off.You know as well as i do he is scared of the truth about that.He is just trolling here trying to get reactions out of you all and you all keep taking the bait.Thats so obvious the way he blatently ignores facts that prove him wrong constanly.
Originally posted by Fire Ninja
An irrational person is one who lets personal bias get in the way of objective reasoning. You have no knowledge of the subject, you simply dismissed it calling it stupid and insulted me as well. Yet, you have the audacity to call me illogical, lease go look up logic before you post.There is no plane in any of the live shots, except a 2-d cut out. As for plane wrecakge, they also found the terrorist passport the next day. . .magically. So, it's obvious they are planting evidence.
If you want to skip the plane attacks, go ahead. But, don't call yourself a researcher if your goal is to find evidence to fit your bias views on 9-11. I thought, this research was stupid too, until I looked it up. . .Objectively.
That pretty much says it all right there.very well said.the part where you said research the subject is what he NEVER does.anytime ANYBODY offers evidence that shoots down his desperate and pathetic theorys bombs were not set off, he dismisses it and ignores it, never bothering to acknowledge he has lost his arguments.the overwhelming proof that he is here to just troll and has no interest in the truth is all you got to do is just challenge him to read a book that documents and proves it all that bombs were set off and he will never come back and say something like-"okay I'll go to the library and check it out and read it and get back to you." because he knows he cant counter the truth in these books. 🙄 I mean anytime someone challenges ME to read a book like someone did on the clinton thread recently,I'll tell them I'll read that book like i am with a guy who told me to read his clinton book he suggested, which is easy to point out the lies of by the way. 😉
Originally posted by Mr Parker
That pretty much says it all right there.very well said.the part where you said research the subject is what he NEVER does.anytime ANYBODY offers evidence that shoots down his desperate and pathetic theorys bombs were not set off, he dismisses it and ignores it, never bothering to acknowledge he has lost his arguments.the overwhelming proof that he is here to just troll and has no interest in the truth is all you got to do is just challenge him to read a book that documents and proves it all that bombs were set off and he will never come back and say something like-"okay I'll go to the library and check it out and read it and get back to you." because he knows he cant counter the truth in these books. 🙄 I mean anytime someone challenges ME to read a book like someone did on the clinton thread recently,I'll tell them I'll read that book like i am with a guy who told me to read his clinton book he suggested, which is easy to point out the lies of by the way. 😉
Someone please proof read this guy's stuff so I can laugh more. Seriously you could get a show on comedy central looking at this guy's....well you couldn't call them paragraphs, but his words. Its so funny. I saw 0 correct capitalizations though I might have missed one. "clinton" is a name and should start with a capital, I saw no capitals at the beginning of sentences, and "very well said." is not a complete sentence! LOL
Originally posted by Korosan
Someone please proof read this guy's stuff so I can laugh more. Seriously you could get a show on comedy central looking at this guy's
That's funny considering you've made the same errors in sentence structure. That you're critiquing parker about in the very same reply.
Originally posted by Korosan
....well you couldn't call them paragraphs, but his words.its so funny.
[/B]
"It's so funny" is not a complete sentence. 😬
Originally posted by Korosan
I saw 0 correct capitalizations though I might have missed one. "clinton" is a name and should start with a capital, [/B]
Which is why you did not capitalize "Clinton", right?
Originally posted by Korosan
I saw no capitals at the beginning of sentences, and "very well said." is not a complete sentence! LOL [/B]
Just like "It's so funny." is not a sentence either. 😬
Originally posted by Fire NinjaI have already stated all of what you are asking.
But, you haven't even researched the subject?! How can what you said even apply to you, you just dismissed it because "It's obviously stupid". Furthermore, "High unlikelyness" what makes it highly unlikely, get me a statistic or some math and then we can go into that tangent. Also, an objective person regards every claim with out personal bias, which you are not even doing. What logic supports your bias, when you haven't even looked into the subject.
Originally posted by Mr ParkerYou mean, debunking them. Where have I ever ran away from a debate?
That pretty much says it all right there.very well said.the part where you said research the subject is what he NEVER does.anytime ANYBODY offers evidence that shoots down his desperate and pathetic theorys bombs were not set off, he dismisses it and ignores it, never bothering to acknowledge he has lost his arguments.
Originally posted by Mr ParkerHa. Everything you've reffered me to, I found doesn't exist. I google them, can't find them. You're a liar, you're a troll you're pathetic.
the overwhelming proof that he is here to just troll and has no interest in the truth is all you got to do is just challenge him to read a book that documents and proves it all that bombs were set off and he will never come back and say something like-"okay I'll go to the library and check it out and read it and get back to you." because he knows he cant counter the truth in these books. 🙄
Originally posted by Mr ParkerI looked in that thred. You'tr claim is false. You haven't done that. I do see that the last post is mine, and you haven't yet addressed it after a week. Why not?
I mean anytime someone challenges ME to read a book like someone did on the clinton thread recently,I'll tell them I'll read that book like i am with a guy who told me to read his clinton book he suggested, which is easy to point out the lies of by the way. 😉
Originally posted by Fire Ninja
That's funny considering you've made the same errors in sentence structure. That you're critiquing parker about in the very same reply."It's so funny" is not a complete sentence. 😬
Which is why you did not capitalize "Clinton", right?
Just like "It's so funny." is not a sentence either. 😬
GJ I should proofread more as well lol Just a small note about the Clinton thing, I was quoting him, so it was intentionally not capitalized. New Idea, lets get a show on Comedy Central proof reading my own and Parker's..."sentences" lol I would watch it.
If I had a chance to really write a longer thread I would but please check out this video at minute 47 on to whenever it stops talking about the towers. This is hard to refute:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5547481422995115331
The rest of the video is very interesting but this actually picks up on a lot of stuff
Originally posted by chithappensSeen it. Most of it is kinda inaccurate. However, I was amazed at the MI5 agent. That opened my eyes, then I remembered that 7/7 happened just two months after the election, why do all these bad conspiracy type things happen just after an election?
If I had a chance to really write a longer thread I would but please check out this video at minute 47 on to whenever it stops talking about the towers. This is hard to refute:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5547481422995115331
The rest of the video is very interesting but this actually picks up on a lot of stuff
Originally posted by Korosan
GJ I should proofread more as well lol Just a small note about the Clinton thing, I was quoting him, so it was intentionally not capitalized. New Idea, lets get a show on Comedy Central proof reading my own and Parker's..."sentences" lol I would watch it.
pretty pathetic that thats ALL you have to do is act childish when I make points that prove I am right.I prove that XYZ is just trolling because he will NEVER take you up on a challenge that proves him wrong and read a book you refer him to that proves he is wrong because it documents it all with facts -something he constantly ignores, because he knows its the truth and is too pigheaded to admit it when he is wrong and THIS is your defense for him? how pathetic you are. 😛
Originally posted by Mr Parker
pretty pathetic that thats ALL you have to do is act childish when I make points that prove I am right.I prove that XYZ is just trolling because he will NEVER take you up on a challenge that proves him wrong and read a book you refer him to that proves he is wrong because it documents it all with facts -something he constantly ignores, because he knows its the truth and is too pigheaded to admit it when he is wrong and THIS is your defense for him? how pathetic you are. 😛
I dont know jack about XYZ lol Im not going to try to defend him. Just notice you seem to say stuff like that about XYZ all the time. I'm not saying its wrong though cause I really don't care. I make fun of things, its what I do lol
Originally posted by KorosanHe says more shit about me then he does about anyone else. It's actually quite scary.
I dont know jack about XYZ lol Im not going to try to defend him. Just notice you seem to say stuff like that about XYZ all the time. I'm not saying its wrong though cause I really don't care. I make fun of things, its what I do lol