Student gets arrested and tasered at John Kerry Forum

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
life is full of maybe's and what if's.

(Repeat) Yeah, that's why we go with the facts, when available... Do you really not understand that?

Maybe he was Al Qaida and was reaching for a bomb. = Taser justified.

What if he was about to overpower the four officers and kill everyone in the room in a bloodrage. = Taser justified

See how ridiculous that is though?

I asked two question there, BTW.

Originally posted by Robtard
(Repeat) Yeah, that's why we go with the facts, when available... Do you really not understand that?

Maybe he was Al Qaida and was reaching for a bomb. = Taser justified.

What if he was about to overpower the four officers and kill everyone in the room in a bloodrage. = Taser justified

See how ridiculous that is though?

now...you gonna answer my question?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
in both of those instances, yes, taser justified.

now...you gonna answer my question?

You did not answer the questions, but the hypothetical situations he used to illustrate his point.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yes, I get that. all we have is a crappy vid, you gonna put all your eggs in that basket?

in both of those instances, yes, taser justified.

now...you gonna answer my question?

Crappy or not, that fact remains that he was tasered after he was subdued, that part of the video is clear. So yes, this basket doesn't break eggs.

They were rhetorical*.

I answer all [your] question, unlike someone.

*and:

Originally posted by Bardock42
You did not answer the questions, but the hypothetical situations he used to illustrate his point.

I will ask again...do you know how a taser works? exactly how it incapacitates someone?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I will ask again...do you know how a taser works? exactly how it incapacitates someone?

And as before, my answer is "yes".

Originally posted by Robtard
And as before, my answer is "yes".

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
explain.

Are you F'ing serious? You know this will be the 8th, maybe 9th question of yours I answered, yet you still haven't answered mine.

It uses electricity to override your muscle-triggering functions, it makes you spasm uncontrollably. It also hurts.

Originally posted by Robtard
Are you F'ing serious? You know this will be the 8th, maybe 9th question of yours I answered, yet you still haven't answered mine.

It uses electricity to override your muscle-triggering functions, it makes you spasm uncontrollably. It also hurts.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
right, it targets the muscles and pretty much turns you into a big glob of jelly. you cannot move. NOW...tell me, when might this come in handy to an arresting officer?

You are rude and unfair.

Originally posted by Bardock42
You are rude and unfair.

I will tell you when this comes in handy. You and I are arresting someone, right? we have him on the ground, on his belly, hands behind his back, but he is resisting. if we are to force his arms together, we are risking injury to him, perhaps a broken arm or a dislocated shoulder.

The taser, although it hurts, is non lethal and enables us to cuff him without injuring him. better a few seconds of pain than a broken bone, wouldnt you say?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
right, it targets the muscles and pretty much turns you into a big glob of jelly. you cannot move. NOW...tell me, when might this come in handy to an arresting officer?

Yeah, what I said...

Answer: Tasers are useful in subduing a suspect. They are useless in subduing an already subdued suspect, unless you just want to "zap" a guy for fun.

-Question Anwsering Tournamet-

Robtard 10 RogueJedi 0

B-42 is correct, you are both rude and unfair. He was referring to your dodging games.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
why?

I will tell you when this comes in handy. You and I are arresting someone, right? we have him on the ground, on his belly, hands behind his back, but he is resisting. if we are to force his arms together, we are risking injury to him, perhaps a broken arm or a dislocated shoulder.

The taser, although it hurts, is non lethal and enables us to cuff him without injuring him. better a few seconds of pain than a broken bone, wouldnt you say?

Because you demand answers by Robtard constantly. 9, no, 10 already now. And as far as I see, you did not answer any of his. It is not the way a debate should go. I don't think you do it on purpose....which is even more mind boggling.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
why?

I will tell you when this comes in handy. You and I are arresting someone, right? we have him on the ground, on his belly, hands behind his back, but he is resisting. if we are to force his arms together, we are risking injury to him, perhaps a broken arm or a dislocated shoulder.

The taser, although it hurts, is non lethal and enables us to cuff him without injuring him. better a few seconds of pain than a broken bone, wouldnt you say?

Sure, with the exception that both his arms were already pinned behind his back.

edit

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I see you have no comeback for this....

Are you just playing games, or are you ****ing insane? I countered and answered your question.

Here, I'll repost it, even though it's right above:

Answer: Tasers are useful in subduing a suspect. They are useless in subduing an already subdued suspect, unless you just want to "zap" a guy for fun.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
edit

There is no need to have a comeback. You did not make a valuable point. You stated something, that one might or might not agree with, but it does not relate to the topic at hand.

Not to forget that Robtard and I know what tazers are and how they work and how they are used and in what way they are useful.

That's a false dilemma, RJ. What reason do we have to think that those are the only two options in this case? Taze or break bones.

Originally posted by Robtard
Sure, with the exception that both his arms were already pinned behind his back.

see, this is what I meant by being so quick to judge.

BTW: I answered all of your questions, you just dont like my answers.

if you like, ask them again, and I will answer in the same fashion as before.

Originally posted by Robtard
Are you just playing games, or are you ****ing insane? I countered and answered your question.

Here, I'll repost it, even though it's right above:

[b]Answer: Tasers are useful in subduing a suspect. They are useless in subduing an already subdued suspect, unless you just want to "zap" a guy for fun. [/B]