Originally posted by Rogue JediHaha, you play the "Cops are always right", "He should have done this, he should have done that", while you yourself disrespect the laws. It's hypocritical. Go ahead, try to insult me as pathetic again, the fact is it is obvious you behave unintelligent in every thread you enter. Also, hypocritical.
and to drag it from another thread? do you have THAT little to do with yourself?
Originally posted by Bardock42so you take what I said in a DIFFERENT thread from a DIFFERENT part of the forum, something you KNOW is a joke, quote it, place it here, and try to make me look like the idiot?
Haha, you play the "Cops are always right", "He should have done this, he should have done that", while you yourself disrespect the laws. It's hypocritical. Go ahead, try to insult me as pathetic again, the fact is it is obvious you behave unintelligent in every thread you enter. Also, hypocritical.
Have you ever just stepped back and took a good hard look at what you do? Do you try to be clever here in order to make up for real life shortcomings?
No, your problem is that try as you might, you can never coerce me into your way of thinking, you call me "unintelligent" and an "idiot" because I don't cower and bow down before you like some others do here. What you are is a troll and a flamer, an internet bully. Get a life, man.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
so you take what I said in a DIFFERENT thread from a DIFFERENT part of the forum, something you KNOW is a joke, quote it, place it here, and try to make me look like the idiot?
It's not a Joke quote, it is consistent with the rest of your argument in this particular thread. And it fits on this thread. I am sorry if you thought whatever you say in one thread only stays in there, it does not.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Have you ever just stepped back and took a good hard look at what you do? Do you try to be clever here in order to make up for real life shortcomings?
Yes, I always do, I could ask you the same, but the answer is obvious.
And what a low reply. You really want to be the kind of person that replies that way? Pretty pathetic, don't you think?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
No, your problem is that try as you might, you can never coerce me into your way of thinking, you call me "unintelligent" and an "idiot" because I don't cower and bow down before you like some others do here. What you are is a troll and a flamer, an Internet bully. Ge a life, man.
No, I call you that because you are unable to think logically. You say ignorant things and can not follow deductive reasoning. You have an extremely short attention span and memory. You weasel around in topics, never contributing anything, but an initial point you are usually unable to defend. You are not unintelligent because I think you are, you just, factually, are.
I am not an Internet bully. You can't deal with opposition. You ignore points and you go off on tangents. You behave like an ******* in debates. And when you get called an idiot for it (the scientific term for people like you) you cry a lot, pretend to be an innocent victim and use that as your new tangent.
You are also hypocritical.
Originally posted by Bardock42Do you feel better now? Did you huff and puff and get it all off your chest? Hope so, because you amuse me, you really do.
It's not a Joke quote, it is consistent with the rest of your argument in this particular thread. And it fits on this thread. I am sorry if you thought whatever you say in one thread only stays in there, it does not.Yes, I always do, I could ask you the same, but the answer is obvious.
And what a low reply. You really want to be the kind of person that replies that way? Pretty pathetic, don't you think?No, I call you that because you are unable to think logically. You say ignorant things and can not follow deductive reasoning. You have an extremely short attention span and memory. You weasel around in topics, never contributing anything, but an initial point you are usually unable to defend. You are not unintelligent because I think you are, you just, factually, are.
I am not an Internet bully. You can't deal with opposition. You ignore points and you go off on tangents. You behave like an ******* in debates. And when you get called an idiot for it (the scientific term for people like you) you cry a lot, pretend to be an innocent victim and use that as your new tangent.
You are also hypocritical.
NOW...
Anything to add to the subject of this thread? Because it has been frimly established that the taser was incredibly justified. If you don't think so, if you still are under the illusion that the cops were excessive, then read the articles I posted. If you read them and STILL think the cops were excessive, then you are so blind it's not even funny.
I have a follow up question....the way you behave here, is that who you are in real life?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Do you feel better now? Did you huff and puff and get it all off your chest? Hope so, because you amuse me, you really do.
I just replied to your baseless accusations. And elaborated on my point.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
NOW...Anything to add to the subject of this thread? Because it has been frimly established that the taser was incredibly justified. If you don't think so, if you still are under the illusion that the cops were excessive, then read the articles I posted. If you read them and STILL think the cops were excessive, then you are so blind it's not even funny.
It has not been firmly established. Hardly anyone but you believes so. And you are not a particular valuable example. The cops used excessive force for no reason. Whether the persons intention was to disrupt the Q&A is of no matter. Free country. The guy was no threat to anyone.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I have a follow up question....the way you behave here, is that who you are in real life?
Yes. (see how that worked, you asked something, I answered, now, I just wish that would work the other way round)
Originally posted by Bardock42Translation: I am Bardock, I am an internet bully. someone please help me.
I just replied to your baseless accusations. And elaborated on my point.
It has not been firmly established. Hardly anyone but you believes so. And you are not a particular valuable example. The cops used excessive force for no reason. Whether the persons intention was to disrupt the Q&A is of no matter. Free country. The guy was no threat to anyone.Every action we take has consequences, and he suffered the consequences. I am surprised he got away with just a tase. I have stated several times why the tase was justified, but you and your little minions are ignoring it, because none of you are capable of admitting when you are wrong.
Yes. (see how that worked, you asked something, I answered, now, I just wish that would work the other way round)Yes? WOW......just WOW.....and you have friends? They put up with you?
So, quick recap: You think I am an unintelligent, idiotic dodger...and I think you are a chronic know it all internet bully. Are we even?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Translation: I am Bardock, I am an internet bully. someone please help me.
You do realize the Irony, right?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Every action we take has consequences, and he suffered the consequences. I am surprised he got away with just a tase. I have stated several times why the tase was justified, but you and your little minions are ignoring it, because none of you are capable of admitting when you are wrong.
No, you are just wrong. It was excessive. The tasing was not needed. You just support it cause you like Cops and want to be one. People that are pinned to the floor, begging for mercy don't need to be shocked.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yes? WOW......just WOW.....and you have friends? They put up with you?
Yes, they happen to be intelligent though. In fact, apparently lots of people on here put up with me, while next to all think you are stupid. How do you explain that?
Originally posted by Rogue JediNo. I am right and you just try to insult me, to indulge in your idiotic dodging.
So, quick recap: You think I am an unintelligent, idiotic dodger...and I think you are a chronic know it all internet bully. Are we even?
But noooo, I am out there to get you. I just do that cause I hate you. You are not at fault at all. Do you really believe that? Everyone that points out your misbehaviour is part of the "Hate RJ conspiracy"?
Originally posted by Bardock42No, I'm just a big old dummyhead. Please explain it 2 meeee... wanker
You do realize the Irony, right?
Yes, they happen to be intelligent though. In fact, apparently lots of people on here put up with me, while next to all think you are stupid. How do you explain that?you think I give a Rats arse what people here think of me here? You just proved that you seek others approval to make yourself feel better about yourself.
No. I am right and you just try to insult me, to indulge in your idiotic dodging.Oh yeah, the great Bardock is always right. Heaven help us if someone doesn't agree with you.
But noooo, I am out there to get you. I just do that cause I hate you. You are not at fault at all. Do you really believe that? Everyone that points out your misbehaviour is part of the "Hate RJ conspiracy"?Hate RJ conspiracy? 😆 I'll give you points for drama on that one. Again, you are saying "everyone", and again, you think I care what is said or thought of me? Unlike you, I need not seek out others approval to justify my own existence. And the mere fact that you can hate someone because you don't like the way they post and/or because of their opinions shows how shallow and quick to judge you are.
No, you are just wrong. It was excessive. The tasing was not needed. You just support it cause you like Cops and want to be one. People that are pinned to the floor, begging for mercy don't need to be shocked.I am gonna throw a hypothetical situation at you on this one. I know you will dismiss it, because you will have no comeback for it:
You and I are cops, we are arresting someone. He is on the ground, on his belly, and I have the cuffs on his right wrist, waiting for you to bring the other wrist around. NOW....Dude is resisting with everything he has. You know that you can force that second arm around, but by doing so, you are risking permanently injuring him. NOW....You have a taser, and if you taser him, he will turn into silly putty, and we can do whatever we want with him. NOW.....do you take the chance, force his arm around, risk permanently injuring him, or do you tase him, make him put up with a few seconds of pain, so that we may arrest him without injuring him permanently?
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
No, I'm just a big old dummyhead. Please explain it 2 meeee... wanker
Okay, well, you call me an Internet bully, while you are the one trying to bully me. I just point out what you do, you try to insult me as bully and pathetic guy that needs to insult you to feel good. Both is not true.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
you think I give a Rats arse what people here think of me here? You just proved that you seek others approval to make yourself feel better about yourself.
No, I asked you a question. I did not say that it was any indication.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Oh yeah, the great Bardock is always right. Heaven help us if someone doesn't agree with you.
I am right in this case. I don't claim to be always right. Though I would say it's 10/10 when talking to you.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Hate RJ conspiracy? 😆 I'll give you points for drama on that one.
It's something you brought up oftentimes before. I just restated your ideas.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Again, you are saying "everyone", and again, you think I care what is said or thought of me?
I said everyone that does that. Which is not everyone.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Unlike you, I need not seek out others approval to justify my own existence. And the mere fact that you can hate someone because you don't like the way they post and/or because of their opinions shows how shallow and quick to judge you are.
See, you are trying to paint me as a pathetic loser that needs the attention of others. You realize that is the bullying you are accusing me of. It is also not true and nothing in my posts implied anything like it. Can you try to acquire a clean debating style for our conversation now? Your behaviour is tedious.
My point was you stay behind the police 100% except if it is about something illegal you feel like doing. This guy deserved tasing, for...close to nothing at all, but you can actually break the laws and it's just a laughing matter. Haha, I get it, hypocrite!
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I am gonna throw a hypothetical situation at you on this one. I know you will dismiss it, because you will have no comeback for it:You and I are cops, we are arresting someone. He is on the ground, on his belly, and I have the cuffs on his right wrist, waiting for you to bring the other wrist around. NOW....Dude is resisting with everything he has. You know that you can force that second arm around, but by doing so, you are risking permanently injuring him. NOW....You have a taser, and if you taser him, he will turn into silly putty, and we can do whatever we want with him. NOW.....do you take the chance, force his arm around, risk permanently injuring him, or do you tase him, make him put up with a few seconds of pain, so that we may arrest him without injuring him permanently?
Is he begging me not to tase him?
Either way, tasers are for protection of the cop. A last instance before you grab the weapon. Not a day to day object you use on all and everybody.
So, yes, I would force his arm and risk the very, very small risk, of injuring him (since I am not supposed to use the taser)
Originally posted by Bardock42*applauds* I sense much hate in you. You should love more. Love life. Love others. Love nature, in spite of what it did to you
Okay, well, you call me an Internet bully, while you are the one trying to bully me. I just point out what you do, you try to insult me as bully and pathetic guy that needs to insult you to feel good. Both is not true.No, I asked you a question. I did not say that it was any indication.
I am right in this case. I don't claim to be always right. Though I would say it's 10/10 when talking to you.
It's something you brought up oftentimes before. I just restated your ideas.
I said everyone that does that. Which is not everyone.
See, you are trying to paint me as a pathetic loser that needs the attention of others. You realize that is the bullying you are accusing me of. It is also not true and nothing in my posts implied anything like it. Can you try to acquire a clean debating style for our conversation now? Your behaviour is tedious.
My point was you stay behind the police 100% except if it is about something illegal you feel like doing. This guy deserved tasing, for...close to nothing at all, but you can actually break the laws and it's just a laughing matter. Haha, I get it, hypocrite!
Is he begging me not to tase him?Did you just say that the taser is used for POLICE PROTECTION?Either way, tasers are for protection of the cop. A last instance before you grab the weapon. Not a day to day object you use on all and everybody.
So, yes, I would force his arm and risk the very, very small risk, of injuring him (since I am not supposed to use the taser)
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
*applauds* I sense much hate in you. You should love more. Love life. Love others. Love nature, in spite of what it did to you
Troll.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Did you just say that the taser is used for POLICE PROTECTION?
Yes, to protect officers without using lethal force.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Police have others means to protect themselves without using lethal force. Nightstick. ASP. Baton. Thier hands. The taser is for the SUSPECTS safety, a means to arrest them without killing them.
Bullshit.
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthThat adds to the bullshit.
Except that tasers can and have killed.A lot of people.