Originally posted by Alfheim
For.......the........love.....of God! Its not a loaded question. What this is is debating ettiquitte. I answered your question......I repeat again I answered your question.......this.....is.....ETIQUETTE. You know treat others the way you would like to be treated? Therefore I answer your question......you......answer.......mine.
What part of ettiquite is there in tricking or forcing someone to answer a loaded question, to give validation to a logical fallacy?
Originally posted by Alfheim
So your telling me
I'm not telling you anything. Especially not either of the following two statements. To insist otherwise is to make a strawman argument. You created the statments, Not I. You're expecting me to counter statments theat you made but saying that I made them.
Originally posted by Alfheim
an intellignet bouncer would assume that everybody they will intimidate will back down
No, I do not like absolutes. But are you telling me that they would not expect a person to back down from using an intimidation tactic?
I love how you ignored a previous question by calling it a question you already answered, and thus by dodging it you can force this question on me.
Let me ask you again: "Why was wolverine threatening Namor?"
What was the purpose of doing that?
Originally posted by Alfheim
OR will they keep in the back of their mind that there might be trouble just in case.
Again, I'll answer AGAIN like you keep ignoring so I'll have to answer again because you outright expect me to choose Only one of the two answers you've selected....
But neither case. A person will not ALWAYS assume something, but there might be cases where they forget or do not expect an attack.
There, have I answered you damned loaded question satisfactorily enough or should I just put my hand s up and say I agree with you when I don't?
You're going to force me to pick one of the two options when I agree with neither?