WWH vs Wonder Woman w/twist

Originally posted by Raoul

dc fans dont post PORN.

the marvel fans cause more trouble than the DC ones, FACT.

there are more marvel fans than dc ones in this board, FACT. and its been that way for a LONG time.

guess what, im a marvel fan, just as much if not moreso than dc. but bar fangirl, i rarely have trouble with dc fans getting all bent out of shape, misrepresenting scans and misbehaving.

believe me, don't believe me, i don't care. my sig and the shitload of marvel comics i have in drawer-boxes can't be argued with...

👆

Over the past few months I've bought Red Hulk, Astonishing X-Men, New X-Men, Young X-Men, Secret Invasion, Ultimate X-Men, Ultimate Spiderman, Runaways, FoolKiller under Marvel's MAX imprint, Ultimates, 2 Wolverine one-shots, Wolverine/Kitty first class, Messiah Complex, X-Men Divided we stand...maybe more Marvel comics I've forgotten about. And from DC I've bought the first few issues of the Trinity series and that's it. So I wouldn't call myself biased when arguing in favour of a DC character.

Originally posted by Creshosk
That's a funny thing to be saying to someone sporting a cyclops signature... Do you have any clue about whom you're talking to?

Cum hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy - just because he has a Cyclops pic in his sig doesn't stop him from consistently warning and banning members who bring forth equal statements about Marvel characters.

Just because hulk wank isn't as defended as you'd like it to be doesn't mean the forum is DC biased.

Appeal to motive fallacy.

Originally posted by Badabing
If you have a problem with a mod then take it to a PM. But throwing around scans without context, using very low feats and making false accusations isn't how we do things on KMC. Then take your "debate" somewhere else. You won't be breaking any hearts by leaving. I thought the month ban you got after your last meltdown would have helped you realize what's acceptable on KMC.

Sado and Kutulu consider this a warning to both of you.

Oooh a warning, so scared, don't whips me, masta sir! jsmirk

Originally posted by Kutulu
Cum hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy - just because he has a Cyclops pic in his sig doesn't stop him from consistently warning and banning members who bring forth equal statements about Marvel characters.

Appeal to motive fallacy.

i warn the ones that cause the most problems. its not my fault they happen to be marvel fans, if you could even call them that.

Originally posted by Creshosk
All that means is that you're doing what you're accusing others of doing. If you don't like it don't do it. Its a thing that can be easily fixed and is hardly an insult. Think of it more like a warning light going off that will allow you to fix behavior that you might not approve of. If you don't care about doing things that you accuse others of then its like water off of a duck's back. Its simply the fastest most efficient way of letting you know about behavior that is easily correctable that you might not be aware of.

You were being dishonest. Again, a simple little warning light of behavior that you might not be aware of. There's no double standard about it. If your fly was down at a party you'd appreciate someone telling you wouldn't you?

No, it was a bad argument that failed to make its point as it was invalid. I understood exactly what you were saying. And I was letting you know your fly was down. And then you started resorting to actual insults by calling me pathetic and biased and now more recently stupid. Which is a bit more aggressive than simply letting you know about behavior you might be unaware of.

If you responded with a civil tone, no I wouldn't report you. But things like pathetic and stupid and most definitely insults.

Yeah, you probably expected me to respond by flaming you back just as you flamed me. But I'm not going to call you pathetic nor stupid. I will let you know that your zipper is down so that you can fix it or if you don't mind that your zipper is down, I'll ask why you even bother wearing pants.

You call me a dishonest hypocrite, have the audacity to try to justify it and then report me for calling you biased, and your ARGUMENTS pathetic. Hilarious. 🤣 😆 Not only that after you report me you still proceed to call me a hypocrite and still have the guts to tell me about being civil. What the hell?? 🙄

I was never dishonest but you were being biased period. You choose to ignore the beliefs of the charcters about there own equipment and then attribute to it qualities which were never stated or implied anywhere in the comic. It qualifies as being biased. You consider biased and insult but NOT hypocrite? 😕

My point was very valid. The creators of the machine knew its powers and did NOT design it with enough force to do what you say. Unless it got some unforseen upgrade therefore it CANNOT have done what it was not capable of in the first place!! So simple yet so hard 4 u to understand.

Now to the most laughable part, you are using a ridiculous analogy of my fly being down while still trying to tell me about being civil and still
refering to me as being a hypocrite all at the same time. Extreme Hypocrisy for sure. 😆

Originally posted by Raoul
i warn the ones that cause the most problems. its not my fault they happen to be marvel fans, if you could even call them that.

Yet you just happen to not warn the ones that are DC fans that have similar behavior. Had you been equally biased, posters like Illac0ck would have been banned ages ago. On top of that you warn someone who posted conclusive evidence of fangirl01 being Nvr.

KMC, where if you love DC the mods got your back. 😆

Originally posted by ultimatethor
You call me a dishonest hypocrite, have the audacity to try to justify it and then report me for calling you biased, and your ARGUMENTS pathetic. Hilarious. 🤣 😆 Not only that after you report me you still proceed to call me a hypocrite and still have the guts to tell me about being civil. What the hell?? 🙄

I was never dishonest but you were being biased period. You choose to ignore the beliefs of the charcters about there own equipment and then attribute to it qualities which were never stated or implied anywhere in the comic. It qualifies as being biased. You consider biased and insult but NOT hypocrite? 😕

My point was very valid. The creators of the machine knew its powers and did NOT design it with enough force to do what you say. Unless it got some unforseen upgrade therefore it CANNOT have done what it was not capable of in the first place!! So simple yet so hard 4 u to understand.

Now to the most laughable part, you are using a ridiculous analogy of my fly being down while still trying to tell me about being civil and still
refering to me as being a hypocrite all at the same time. Extreme Hypocrisy for sure. 😆

In D&D they call Creshok's type of person Lawful evil; he exploits the rules as much as possible, runs and hides behind the mods when people call him out, then acts all innocent after he spent pages egging someone on when they get pissed off. In reality he's just an evil prick sitting behind the keyboard who gets to be an as sho1e all day to people on the internet while hiding behind the mods because they got his back.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
. The hulk was not simply launched INTO the asteroid to destroy it this is obvious as it is NOT the intention of the scientists.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
It is instead stated that the hulk is to use the rocket springs to get there and then use his STRENGTH to destroy it. Clearly there on panel!

Originally posted by ultimatethor
IF this was the intention of the scientist IT would have bin clearly stated. Howver u seem to not care about what the scientist said they were doing and have decided to come to ur own conclusions. 😱

Originally posted by ultimatethor
Also if the rocket springs had been designed to simply shoot hulk into the asteroid with enough force for him to destroy it, it would have been clearly stated.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
So unless they somehow got an upgrade then we can assume they performed as they were originally designed.

"An object in motion will remain in motion until acted upon by another force." You can try and ignore the laws of physics and the rules of logic all you want, this is what I say makes you dishonest, but beyond that it changes nothing.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
And you really dont want to get into a physics argument with me.

It does not simply dissipate. and as the "rocket springs" do not appear to be designed for manueverability, they got him to the rocket, but then the force to get him there does not simply cease to exist. Energy and matter cannot be destroyed.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
Im simply pointing out what all the all panel evidence points to.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
Ur business if u choose to ignore it.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
Let me give u a better equation or should i say inequality. Facts stated or implied by the creators of the rocket springs and hulk himself>>>>than baseless opinion.

The truth>Facts stated or implied by the scientists>your baseless opinions.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
The hulk uses a double fisted punch to destroy the asteroid and since we can determine that the springs do not have the power to destroy the asteroid by simply ramming hulk into it

If the scientists were 100% correct in their calculations Hulk would have needed the device. He didn't use it, so their calculations were off.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
from statements by creators of the springs this is verified. Physics is NOT on ur side as it is obvious that the springs DO NOT have the force to destroy the asteroid by launching the hulk into it.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
And really after first calling me a dishonest hypocrite why are u so worked up about the fact i called u biased?

Originally posted by ultimatethor
Choosing to ignore statements made by the designers of the equipment regarding its functionality certainly qualifies as biased.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
You keep talking about the force of the launch without evn comprhending the fact that the force of the launch was not enough to destroy the asteroid by simply ramming the hulk into it.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
I bet the scientist who created it did not know the power of their own equipment 🙁 . Laughable 😆

And in case you couldn't tell that was sarcasm. Reported for bashing and trolling.

Originally posted by Raoul
i warn the ones that cause the most problems. its not my fault they happen to be marvel fans, if you could even call them that.

Go ahead hand out another warning you DC biased modding prick. While you're at it, take a nice hard long suck on my big fat c0ck you DC loving pu s sy. Why not continue to jerk off while you think of Superman's rock hard c0ck shoving up your DC assh0le. 😂

Punk ass beotch of a mod you are, you selfish a s s h0le.

Originally posted by Creshosk
If the intentions of the scientists had any bearing on what happened, hulk would have used that electromagnetic device which he didn't. So their intentions are irrelivant. What they intended to happen didn't. What did happen, did.

Incorrect. You still are disregarding the force that launched him there in the first place. the momentum and kinetic energy of the laiunch does not simply go away like you seem to be implying that it does..

Because what they intended to have happen didn't happen. So their intentions are irrelivant. Therefore what they intended to have happen do not factor in.

Irrelivant. the intentions of the scientists do not change what actually happened.

Which they did. they launched the hulk with enough force to reach the asteroid. But the force does not simply dissipate.

"An object in motion will remain in motion until acted upon by another force." You can try and ignore the laws of physics and the rules of logic all you want, this is what I say makes you dishonest, but beyond that it changes nothing.

Its funny how many people say that to me, and turn out to be wrong about their assessments. Tell me, where did the force go that was required to reach the asteroid once he was out of orbit?

It does not simply dissipate. and as the "rocket springs" do not appear to be designed for manueverability, they got him to the rocket, but then the force to get him there does not simply cease to exist. Energy and matter cannot be destroyed.

No. You're pointing at irrelevant information in the scans. The scientists intentions are irrelevant as the hulk did not do what they intended.

Just as its yours to ignore the physics in place.

And both your baseless opinion and the intentions of the scientists are irrelevant. What the scientists intended did not happen. their intentions were ignored in the comic. therefore they will subsequently be ignored outside of the comic.

The truth>Facts stated or implied by the scientists>your baseless opinions.

Rather, the scientists calculations were obviously wrong about the hulk. They intended to launch him to the asteroid and use a device to assist. obviously he didn't need it, so obviously their calculations were off about the hulk, so they are irrelevant. If you do not like that, there is nothing I can tell you. as your personal tastes have nothing to do with the truth.

If the scientists were 100% correct in their calculations Hulk would have needed the device. He didn't use it, so their calculations were off.

Prove it. The scientists were wrong. Don't like it? Take it up with Marvel. The Hulk did NOT need the device. Therefore their calculations were wrong. Period.

Do you like to be called biased? If you do not like to be called a dishonest hypocrite. quit being dishonest, and quit being hypocritical. I cannot call you something you are not. Well I can, but I'd really rather not.

Hulk really needed the device didn't he? Obviously the scientists are omniscient characters or are you cherry picking what you're listening to? I'm not biased for listening to the message of the story. The scientists were wrong in their calculations, Hulk did not require the device. Oh, and you're reported for bashing again.

Obviously because the scientists were 100% right in their calculations and Hulk needed to use the electromagnetic device to destroy the Asteroid.

Yeah they knew everything which is why the hulk had to use the device to destroy the asteroid, he could not have accomplished the feat without the device.

And in case you couldn't tell that was sarcasm. Reported for bashing and trolling.

Reported for sucking too much DC D1ck. I love how you make up some bullsh1t about the asteroid being hollow and act like it's fact when you have ABSOLUTELY ZERO EVIDENCE TO BACK YOU UP. Then the mods are like "oh yeah, he's right!"

Originally posted by Kutulu
Yet you just happen to not warn the ones that are DC fans that have similar behavior. Had you been equally biased, posters like Illac0ck would have been banned ages ago. On top of that you warn someone who posted conclusive evidence of fangirl01 being Nvr.

KMC, where if you love DC the mods got your back. 😆

lies. plain and simple.

fangirl was banned, if you'd bothered to notice.

bashing now, well aren't you clever?

Hulk beats the hell out of Wonder Woman 10/10

Originally posted by Kutulu
In D&D they call Creshok's type of person Lawful evil; he exploits the rules as much as possible, runs and hides behind the mods when people call him out, then acts all innocent after he spent pages egging someone on when they get pissed off. In reality he's just an evil prick sitting behind the keyboard who gets to be an as sho1e all day to people on the internet while hiding behind the mods because they got his back.

😂 It's pretty sad that you guys have such a crush on Hulk that you make up stories concerning people who argue against him on an internet comics forum.

And that you quoted D&D uhuh

Originally posted by Kutulu
In D&D they call Creshok's type of person Lawful evil; he exploits the rules as much as possible, runs and hides behind the mods when people call him out, then acts all innocent after he spent pages egging someone on when they get pissed off. In reality he's just an evil prick sitting behind the keyboard who gets to be an as sho1e all day to people on the internet while hiding behind the mods because they got his back.

I'm evil, I'll admit, and an *******. But I abide by the rules.

Blatently ignoring the rules and doing whatever you want won't get you brownie points.

I'm Darth Vader. 313

Originally posted by Raoul
lies. plain and simple.

fangirl was banned, if you'd bothered to notice.

bashing now, well aren't you clever?

So you finally banned fangirl, but did you rescind your warning on the people that pointed out fangirl being Nvr? Somehow I doubt it, instead you acted like THEY were in the wrong.

Originally posted by Kutulu
So you finally banned fangirl, but did you rescind your warning on the people that pointed out fangirl being Nvr? Somehow I doubt it, instead you acted like THEY were in the wrong.

its not your job to mod. you don't dictate policy, and you don't even behave well enough to be considered worth listening to. the same goes for others accusing people of being socks.

Originally posted by carver9
I totally agree, I almost get banned everyday if I dont vote for either batman, superman, or wonderwoman. Da** Im scared to post sometimes and Im a grown as man. By the way please dont argue with creshok because thats a most definite ban. Sometimes I think that he is a mod due to how many people he or she have gotten banned. If you bring up something he/she write it off as pis and then he say that you are trolling and will report you which would resort in you getting banned.

So if you continue to argue with him and you end up getting banned please remember I warned you.

Once again a few people ruin a thread for everybody.

i hate when that happens... you'd swear people would have better things to do than try and make themselves feel better by trying to belittle others...