Originally posted by Board WalkerWhen exactly did Superman destroy the omniverse?
Yeah, when SS can phase through the Omniverse and destroy it, you get back to me.SS phase through supes? Oh noes his bio field pwns ss!
GG no re ss!
Hell, the guy who said it was a general, not someone who knows everything about universes, and shit.
Because he said it, it's a fact?
He might be a good vibrator, but to vibrate enough to save the omniverse?
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
When exactly did Superman destroy the omniverse?Hell, the guy who said it was a general, not someone who knows everything about universes, and shit.
Because he said it, it's a fact?He might be a good vibrator, but to vibrate enough to save the omniverse?
Lol, you're ignoring the writer's intent because a general said it? 😂
Yeah, let's just all ignore what was stated on panel because a general said it.
Best idea I've heard all day!!!
Originally posted by batdude123
Lol, you're ignoring the writer's intent because a general said it? 😂Yeah, let's just all ignore what was stated on panel because a general said it.
Best idea I've heard all day!!!
Come now, you know good and well that if some human nobody said the same thing about the Silver Surfer, you'd be raging "What the hell does he know? He's some army no-name!"
Originally posted by SoljerExactly.
Come now, you know good and well that if some human nobody said the same thing about the Silver Surfer, you'd be raging "What the hell does he know? He's some army no-name!"
Also, I'm not ignoring it either. I'm basically saying it is hyperbole.
Unless this general knew about what exactly the blast was doing/could do/will do.
You know, because humans and the like have that sort of extensive knowledge.
Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
Exactly.Also, I'm not ignoring it either. I'm basically saying it is hyperbole.
Unless this general knew about what exactly the blast was doing/could do/will do.
You know, because humans and the like have that sort of extensive knowledge.
And because a general said it, it makes it less impressive now?
You have to factor in writer intent with feats my dear fellow.
Originally posted by batdude123So, why exactly didn't the writer say it in those little boxes?
And because a general said it, it makes it less impressive now?You have to factor in writer intent with feats my dear fellow.
So, does this also mean, that when a human, or just some guy says something, that it's a fact?
Originally posted by Soljer
Random woman after Pete Parker saves her child: "You're the best, Spiderman!"Well, there you have it. Writer's intent. Spiderman is officially superior to the living tribunal.
Horrible example.
There's a huge difference between saying something generalized and affectionate vs. something as specific as "you just prevented an omniversal blast".
I hope you knew the difference.
Anyway, that was assy writing at it's finest.