Superman vs Silver surfer

Started by Board Walker387 pages

He looks pretty cute

Silver Surfers got the upper hand of cosmic powers he could probably make KRYPTONITE thus destroying Superman with it

Yeah, Ommi's biased.

But I still don't see Superman punching a hole in the Surfer.

Originally posted by Soljer
Yeah, Ommi's biased.

But I still don't see Superman punching a hole in the Surfer.

Even if he did, Surfer could regenerate it like he did against Uni - Lord

Originally posted by Soljer
Yeah, Ommi's biased.

But I still don't see Superman punching a hole in the Surfer.


Perhaps more of a dent.

Originally posted by Validus
Perhaps more of a dent.

Supes vibrates through SS.

GG no RE omniverse.

Originally posted by Board Walker
Supes vibrates through SS.

GG no RE omniverse.

Or Silver Surfer phases his hand through Superman and crushes his primary organs.

GG no Superman.

Originally posted by Admiral Akbar
Or Silver Surfer phases his hand through Superman and crushes his primary organs.

GG no Superman.

Yeah, when SS can phase through the Omniverse and destroy it, you get back to me.

SS phase through supes? Oh noes his bio field pwns ss!

GG no re ss!

Originally posted by Board Walker
Yeah, when SS can phase through the Omniverse and destroy it, you get back to me.

SS phase through supes? Oh noes his bio field pwns ss!

GG no re ss!

When exactly did Superman destroy the omniverse?

Hell, the guy who said it was a general, not someone who knows everything about universes, and shit.
Because he said it, it's a fact?

He might be a good vibrator, but to vibrate enough to save the omniverse?

Originally posted by WorldWarHulk

He might be a good vibrator,

More things that sound wrong when taken out of context!

Originally posted by Endless Mike
More things that sound wrong when taken out of context!
Nope... you've got it in context.

Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
When exactly did Superman destroy the omniverse?

Hell, the guy who said it was a general, not someone who knows everything about universes, and shit.
Because he said it, it's a fact?

He might be a good vibrator, but to vibrate enough to save the omniverse?

Lol, you're ignoring the writer's intent because a general said it? 😂

Yeah, let's just all ignore what was stated on panel because a general said it.

Best idea I've heard all day!!!

Originally posted by batdude123
Lol, you're ignoring the writer's intent because a general said it? 😂

Yeah, let's just all ignore what was stated on panel because a general said it.

Best idea I've heard all day!!!

Come now, you know good and well that if some human nobody said the same thing about the Silver Surfer, you'd be raging "What the hell does he know? He's some army no-name!"

Originally posted by Soljer
Come now, you know good and well that if some human nobody said the same thing about the Silver Surfer, you'd be raging "What the hell does he know? He's some army no-name!"
Exactly.

Also, I'm not ignoring it either. I'm basically saying it is hyperbole.
Unless this general knew about what exactly the blast was doing/could do/will do.
You know, because humans and the like have that sort of extensive knowledge.

Maybe if more of the issue was available to read this could be settled

Originally posted by Soljer
Come now, you know good and well that if some human nobody said the same thing about the Silver Surfer, you'd be raging "What the hell does he know? He's some army no-name!"

Human nobody? Hardly.

And I would? 😕

Originally posted by WorldWarHulk
Exactly.

Also, I'm not ignoring it either. I'm basically saying it is hyperbole.
Unless this general knew about what exactly the blast was doing/could do/will do.
You know, because humans and the like have that sort of extensive knowledge.

And because a general said it, it makes it less impressive now?

You have to factor in writer intent with feats my dear fellow.

Originally posted by batdude123
And because a general said it, it makes it less impressive now?

You have to factor in writer intent with feats my dear fellow.

So, why exactly didn't the writer say it in those little boxes?

So, does this also mean, that when a human, or just some guy says something, that it's a fact?

Random woman after Pete Parker saves her child: "You're the best, Spiderman!"

Well, there you have it. Writer's intent. Spiderman is officially superior to the living tribunal.

Originally posted by Soljer
Random woman after Pete Parker saves her child: "You're the best, Spiderman!"

Well, there you have it. Writer's intent. Spiderman is officially superior to the living tribunal.

Horrible example.

There's a huge difference between saying something generalized and affectionate vs. something as specific as "you just prevented an omniversal blast".

I hope you knew the difference.

Anyway, that was assy writing at it's finest.