Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Now i'm lying. So answering that question would've just been in vain. Nice.But let's move forward. I do watch my tongue. (I'm not severely verbally graphic guy to begin with anyway) Of course you'd have to take into considerations the feeling of others. That doesn't mean act differently.
If i swore alot in front of my friends and not at all in front of my grandparents, how is that acting different. That's being unselfish and respectful. And that's fine.
I'm still me with or without the swears. Let me rephrase it. Be yourself 100% while taking others into consideration up until the point come where you'd have to compromise the self. Anything beyond that you'd either be acting false or you'd have to let go of said influence, or person. Even if it's a loved one. But never give up who you are, not even .1% just to receive love or feel wanted. If you can't receive it naturally than it's no good anyway.
maybe lying was the wrong term. You certainly aren't taking the question seriously, and are now speaking out of both sides of your mouth.
"Be yourself 100% while taking others into consideration up until the point come where you'd have to compromise the self. "
while being nearly oxymoronic, this phrase is pretty much what I am talking about. It is completely ambigious and so qualified that you can pretty much justify anything with it. You have essentially labeled "acting differently" as "being yourself".
Swears were the first thing off the top of my head. Do you really have trouble seeing a situation where you need to inhibit your normal response, because the inhibition is more beneficial to yourself?
Lets apply YOUR OWN logic to the idea of a person being in a job interview. being "unselfish and respectful" to the interviewer was what got someone labeled as a "safe black" by you. You must "take into considerations the feeling of [the interviewer]".
Basically, you don't get to say "be yourself" and then say "but when its inconvenient don't", as if it is proof of "being yourself". It is a complete non sequitur.