Originally posted by JacopeX
Wrong.The Spanish are not [B]Hispanics
. They are considered Europeans due to it's location however. I hate it when some arrogant person calls me Spanish because I speak it. 🙄I tend to correct their flawed statements though. SO I feel much better! 😄 [/B]
Yes they are. The term you're looking for is Latino, which is a person from Latin America. Like tu y yo, vato.
Tu no sabe nada, guey.
Originally posted by lord xyz
Don't ***** to us because you have a problem with it. It's your problem, we're an aspect of your life, if you make us one...and you can't change us. Either change yourself, leave, or tolerate us.
ultimatum:
n. pl. ul·ti·ma·tums or ul·ti·ma·ta (-tə😉
1. A final statement of terms made by one party to another.
2. A statement, especially in diplomatic negotiations, that expresses or implies the threat of serious penalties if the terms are not accepted.
Originally posted by chithappensI was not aware of the first definition. May I have a source to confirm this?
ultimatum:n. pl. ul·ti·ma·tums or ul·ti·ma·ta (-tə😉
1. A final statement of terms made by one party to another.
2. A statement, especially in diplomatic negotiations, that expresses or implies the threat of serious penalties if the terms are not accepted.
Originally posted by Schecter
failx2. now go flunk out of college with your info finding skillz
I don't want to end up on ignore again because I value your input so...
I fail majorly because I retaliated on your comments against me by pointing out a simple spelling mistake. I fail because I planned ahead when with my citations by including something other than Wikipedia as a source of information. I also fail because it took 3 minutes to make that cited post because there were plenty of sources for why I was right.
Did I miss anything or I have a failed at life in general?
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Yes they are. The term you're looking for is Latino, which is a person from Latin America. Like tu y yo, vato.Tu no sabe nada, guey.
Bingo...I was going to let him "discover" that information for himself with the references I cited but you response works just as well.
Also, Chithappens, I thought you post was good as well.
Originally posted by lord xyz
I was not aware of the first definition. May I have a source to confirm this?
My bad.
Originally posted by lord xyz
I was not aware of the first definition. May I have a source to confirm this?
Originally posted by dadudemon
I don't want to end up on ignore again because I value your input so...I fail majorly because I retaliated on your comments against me by pointing out a simple spelling mistake. I fail because I planned ahead when with my citations by including something other than Wikipedia as a source of information. I also fail because it took 3 minutes to make that cited post because there were plenty of sources for why I was right.
Did I miss anything or I have a failed at life in general?
Bingo...I was going to let him "discover" that information for himself with the references I cited but you response works just as well.
Also, Chithappens, I thought you post was good as well.
no, you failed x2
1-citing wiki as a source
2-citing an encyclopedia as a source
and i forgot
3-being a spelling nazi
Originally posted by Futureman
I cannot get over the "jokes" from many members of this forum in recent threads. To me skin colour is never an issue, unless others make it one. It seems because one black fool is insulting white members. The white members feel they have the right to be as foolish.Live and let live, judge the individual not the race.
Throwaway humour should be thrown away when it comes to certain issues.
Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Go back to the jungle.
Ditto.
Edit: In case you did not know -
from dictionary.com
dit·to /ˈdɪtoʊ/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[dit-oh] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, plural -tos, adverb, verb, -toed, -to·ing.
–noun
1. the aforesaid; the above; the same (used in accounts, lists, etc., to avoid repetition). Abbreviation: do. Symbol: ″. Compare ditto mark.
2. another of the same.
3. Informal. a duplicate; copy.
–adverb
4. as already stated; likewise.
–verb (used with object)
5. to make a copy of, using a Ditto machine.
6. to duplicate or repeat the action or statement of (another person).
Originally posted by Schecter
no, you failed x21-[b]c
iting wiki as a source
2-citing an encyclopedia as a sourceand i forgot
3-being a spelling nazi [/B]
Wiki is generally a great place for information. However, there are people out there who are like, "nuh uh!! Wiki is all BS because it is written by people and shouldn't be cited!!!" So I cited dictionary.com as a source for the definition of a word...hmmmm, imagine that, dictionary.com defining a word to resolve a debate on the definition of a word.
But whatever dude, you are always right and I obviously failed.
I ONLY corrected you because you thought it important to point out a supposed failure. Misspelling "cited" is a much bigger failure than citing a source such as Wikipedia for the definition of a word.
Originally posted by dadudemonand Norwegians or Scandinavians just like Spain or Hispanics(as in European Hispanics) are considered as caucacians
Since when have Spanish peoples EVER been Caucasians? Spanish peoples are HISPANIC not Caucasians.
Originally posted by dadudemonA caucasoid is a part/member of the caucasian racical clasification
I think you are confusing terms. Spanish peoples are Caucasoids but they are not Caucasians