Darkstorm Zero
Master of all Decepticons
Originally posted by Innominate__1
calm down the only reason i quotes i because i forget what u posted..
Dude, it's not hard to separate my text from yours! If I can do it, so can you. Now I have to, once again dismantle your post from my quotes so I can reply properly, another 10 minutes down the toilet...
Originally posted by Innominate__1
are you calling me that? Or.. Idk
The definition of a strawman argument, read it.
Originally posted by Innominate__1
with volcanic activity it counld de a magmatic hot spot, whose islands usually sink when the hot spot moves to make other islands, never heard of any being sunk from explosions or earthquakes ora punch
What?
Are you now disagreeing with onscreen evidence? Dude, he did it, it happened, capcom confirmed it multiple times... You cannot argue that he didn't do it.
Originally posted by Innominate__1
more importantly, it doesn't quote that the island sunk because of akuma's punch or how he disappears..
Which doesn't detract from it actually happening, unless you want to claim it is more outlandish that he BLEW THE ISLAND UP, or even worse, ERASED IT FROM EXISTANCE. Are you sure you want to play this scemantic game dude?
Originally posted by Innominate__1
years? Wow... And their lips weren't moving how can webe sure it was after? Maybe the mon. before said punch..
it's only 3 pannels
Because the scene involved was already playing before he was talking. Simple really.
Originally posted by Innominate__1
good so they're all in the same tier but still goenitz is well above these guys IMO
Thats your personal speculative oppinion. it's a shame you cannot prove it tho. So please, don't try to pass your oppinion as fact.
Originally posted by Innominate__1
what about name-calling? Is that also against forum rules under trolling? Plus, i was injecting humor into the situation i was not quoting YOU nor did i say ''this is what ur thinking RIGHT NOW DSZ..'' did i? So lighten up
No, name calling (Which I have not done, nice try) comes under Flaming, also against the rules.
What you did was far from humorous. More of a snide remark. And I would lighten up if you'd stop running these debates in circles...
Originally posted by Innominate__1
dematerialize would mean he'd have to become apart, then hed have to materalize elswhere, so how would he retain his form? The other attacks i'd have to see again forgot what they look like, as for the last what's the durabilty of the attack, range, speed?
No, it says dematerialise. Akuma becomes completely intangible during the move, that qualifies.
YouTube video 3rd fight.
Originally posted by Innominate__1
unknown, untested.. Same usually goes for anyone else who teleports in a video game.. Specifications aren't defined as of yet..
Usually not a good idea to use such things as your "debate winning trump card" mate, it'll get shot down faster than Richard Simmonds in a helicopter.
Originally posted by Innominate__1
The dash? It's just a dash... The levatation goenitz does is what i was referring to..
Goenitz doesn't have a levitation technique in any of the games he's in. so unless you plan on introducing those non-official HK comics into this )And beleive me when I say this, you dont wanna do that...) then no, he cannot fly either.
Originally posted by Innominate__1
was being humorus yet again DSZ gees...
I'm not laughing, and you failed to answer the point by trying to divert attention with your attempt.
Originally posted by Innominate__1
that or they don't worry about demonstrating their feats during the game.. Not my prob if u opt for 2 or 3 pannels of ''feats'' rather than story..
*Shakes head* Alright kid, listen up, cause I'm going over this with you only once.
First off, this is a vs debating forum, as in we DEBATE things here. To win a debate, one must provide EVIDENCE of their character winning.
Secondly: having good background story is nice and all, but when one relies on it as stand-alone, it doesn't weigh much. Stories and Backgrounds for characters are not only vague (sometimes non-existant), but are also open to interpretation, therefore, credibility of interpretations is wonky, since many people interprest the same things differently. Example: You mentioning Goenitz can fly, and is invulnerable to everything. These things are specific abilities right? if he had them, when and where did he use them officially? You should be able to at least explain these traits. And on top of this, the invulnerability has a set minimum limit. IE: he has not been tested by someone as powerful as his opponent, same goes for Orochi. You cannot claim a feat surpasses that of an opponent unless it has been demonstrated. Neither Goenitz nor Orochi have ever been hit by a force capable of sinking a landmass.
Originally posted by Innominate__1
u seem to define proof by over embelishing on details in a few pannles worth of info and bring in other irrelevant topics repeat that again and again, i use story,
context clues, character info, common sense..
And a complete disreguard for the rules of burden of proof apparently... Not to mention placing too much emphasis on titles and non defined abilities usually associated with such titles. Your arguments, in other words, are all fluff (as in story) and no substance (as in not a shred of evidence).
And as for going into in-depth analysis, what? Am I not supposed to figure out if a feat is what I'm saying it is? I'm sorry, but it beats blurting crap into existance without anything to back it up... Thats what it means to debate.
Originally posted by Innominate__1
unless he used it for attack instead of defense, hit and interrupt akuma's attacks
The whole point is that the Yonokaze CANNOT intercept multi hit projectiles, and it won't do a damn thing against an attack of the scale of the Sekia Kuretsuha.
And your the one who mentioned Goenitz going on the defence by using Yonokaze as a screen defence in the first place. you've done a goalpost shift in mid point, which is bad etiquette.