Illadelph's Multi Genre Team Tournament Confirmation Thread

Allright then, that makes the it like this

Shenobi Shaw: Smurf, Akuki, Bransolute, Red, King Kandy
Savage Dragon: Fox, Red, Trickster, Charlotte DeBel, DarkCrawler, King kandy
Dalek Sec:
Klaw: *WITHDRAWN* Replaced with Spot
Mirror master: Bransolute, Akuki, Trickster, Smurph
Jotaro: Akuki, Smurph, Charlotte DeBel, Bransolute, King Kandy, Digimark 007
Venom: Smurph, Fox, Bran, King Kandy, Digi
Kira:Trickster, Bran, Smurph
Seras:Trickster
Sage: Trickster
Spot: Trickster
Multiple Man: Digi, Trickster
Dupli-Kate: Digi, Trickster

Right now, with only leo and I confirmed for our team, there's 15 participants, making 80% 12 people.

Does anyone think this is a touch unfair that we need that much? Some teams have 3 people, so literally everyone else would need to vote against someone to ban them. I think a simple majority (8) is more in order, because not everyone participates constantly in this thread.

i agree (no surprise) with digi. duping seems like NOT such a good idea in these things. 😬 i'd vote against anyone with those abilities.

i would also cast votes against the following:

shinobi shaw (ohk potential)
jotaro

venom is really iffy, imo. is carnage allowed as well?

Shenobi Shaw: Smurf, Akuki, Bransolute, Red, King Kandy, Leonidas
Savage Dragon: Fox, Red, Trickster, Charlotte DeBel, DarkCrawler, King kandy
Dalek Sec:
Klaw: *WITHDRAWN* Replaced with Spot
Mirror master: Bransolute, Akuki, Trickster, Smurph
Jotaro: Akuki, Smurph, Charlotte DeBel, Bransolute, King Kandy, Digimark 007, Leonidas
Venom: Smurph, Fox, Bran, King Kandy, Digi
Kira:Trickster, Bran, Smurph
Seras:Trickster
Sage: Trickster
Spot: Trickster
Multiple Man: Digi, Trickster, Leonidas
Dupli-Kate: Digi, Trickster, Leonidas

I would agree with the previous statement by leo. 80% is way to chaotic for this type of thing, and we never get over the confirmation period if so many are needed to vote.

And man, lot of our characters are under the banhammer. This reminds me of the under-Thanos tourney for some reason.

I've adjusted the veto count to 9 votes for consideration. If you can't organize your teammates to vote or have schedule conflicts you'll need to manage that yourselves. I've made time concessions to accommodate that.

Duplication and independent constructs fall under the same rule with set limits.

I think 10 votes is a better number.

Looks like Jotaro and Savage Dragon only need 2 more votes then.

Shenobi Shaw: Smurf, Akuki, Bransolute, Red, King Kandy, Leonidas
Savage Dragon: Fox, Red, Trickster, Charlotte DeBel, DarkCrawler, King kandy,Akuki
Dalek Sec:
Klaw: *WITHDRAWN* Replaced with Spot
Mirror master: Bransolute, Akuki, Trickster, Smurph
Jotaro: Akuki, Smurph, Charlotte DeBel, Bransolute, King Kandy, Digimark 007, Leonidas
Venom: Smurph, Fox, Bran, King Kandy, Digi
Kira:Trickster, Bran, Smurph
Seras:Trickster
Sage: Trickster
Spot: Trickster
Multiple Man: Digi, Trickster, Leonidas
Dupli-Kate: Digi, Trickster, Leonidas

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
I think 10 votes is a better number.

Of course you do. You have 3 on your team.

😛

9 is fine. It's a majority + 1. My thanks to ill for listening and making the change.

Hey Digi, when are you guys planning on posting your picks?

Majority plus 1 sucks. Majority plus 2 is a clear vote and not just mob rule.

2nd, you still have jack shit on evidence against Jotaro.

With 10 votes, you have a clear majority and a clear case. It's showing that it's more than mob rules.

2/3s vote is plenty fair, and it's not insane like the 80% rule.

It's not like voting makes a difference anyway.

We saw Ill over riding them anyway

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
With 10 votes, you have a clear majority and a clear case. It's showing that it's more than mob rules.

2/3s vote is plenty fair, and it's not insane like the 80% rule.

10 votes is better than 8 haermm

trickster didn't make me come in here for reassurance...haermm

I ****ed up on the math. If Digi is joining with Newjak and Leo, that makes 11 votes the 2/3s majority. 😮 My math skills suck.

Originally posted by B.A
It's not like voting makes a difference anyway.

We saw Ill over riding them anyway

I haven't overrided anything, I've simply disregarded the input of non-participants. If you want to help, you'd be better served to do it in private AJ. Anything that you've presented so far is not up for consideration because your not a participant.

Originally posted by illadelph12
I haven't overrided anything, I've simply disregarded the input of non-participants. If you want to help, you'd be better served to do it in private AJ. Anything that you've presented so far is not up for consideration because your not a participant.

I wish I knew who AJ was. 🙁

Scans don't change facts no matter who posts them.

It's inadmissible.

Period.

The other members who take part don't think so.

The point is, the scans don't change because someone doesn't take part.

The other members that are taking part are abiding by the rules.

If you wish to help them I suggest you do as well.

And the matter isn't the scans, it's the fact that a non-participant is making a case, and therefore it's inadmissible.

Also the fact that the evidence thus far has been weak.