it is all the ***** , as i said. men wud rather have two women screwing each other than four who are just naked. men seem to be SPECIFICALLY drawn to lesbian SEX and relationships. and it shud have evolutionary significance, seeing that its such a major desire and is concerned with the most immediet genetic affects and instincts.
Originally posted by leonheartmm
it is all the ***** , as i said. men wud rather have two women screwing each other than four who are just naked. men seem to be SPECIFICALLY drawn to lesbian SEX and relationships. and it shud have evolutionary significance, seeing that its such a major desire and is concerned with the most immediet genetic affects and instincts.
Maybe because they know it isn't their penis being inserted while watching straight porn. There's no evolutionary advantage to watching another man inseminate a hot chick.
😂
^sigh, your not GETTING IT! being turned on by porn, just like being turned on by a girl in a photon or the figure of a naked female is an indirect RESULT of men being genetically programmed to be turned on by ACTUAL FEMALES! that is why it happens and being actually turned on by femals HAS evolutionary significance. that is why men do not usually get turned on by GAY sex either on sum media or in real life if it happened in front of you. however, both in media and in REAL LIFE men are ENORMOUSLY turned on by lesbian sex. which almost definately has a basis in genetics and fundamental instincts{seeing as to how widesperead and basic it is} . now being turned on by a women being done by you makes sense genetically, but being turned on by two women making out which has no part that YOU can play nor have children with, does NOT make sense on such basic genes{genes which are generally there to serve a purpose} and it certainly doesnt make sense to be MORE turned on by the thought of two women doing it than a man and a woman doing it.
Originally posted by leonheartmm
^sigh, your not GETTING IT! being turned on by porn, just like being turned on by a girl in a photon or the figure of a naked female is an indirect RESULT of men being genetically programmed to be turned on by ACTUAL FEMALES! that is why it happens and being actually turned on by femals HAS evolutionary significance. that is why men do not usually get turned on by GAY sex either on sum media or in real life if it happened in front of you.
Originally posted by leonheartmm
now being turned on by a women being done by you makes sense genetically, but being turned on by two women making out which has no part that YOU can play nor have children with, does NOT make sense on such basic genes{genes which are generally there to serve a purpose}
I know a lot of couples where women are not interested in making porn a part of their sexual relationship, and where their men watch porn alone. Obviously, reproduction will not occur.
Originally posted by leonheartmm
^sigh, your not GETTING IT! being turned on by porn, just like being turned on by a girl in a photon or the figure of a naked female is an indirect RESULT of men being genetically programmed to be turned on by ACTUAL FEMALES! that is why it happens and being actually turned on by femals HAS evolutionary significance. that is why men do not usually get turned on by GAY sex either on sum media or in real life if it happened in front of you. however, both in media and in REAL LIFE men are ENORMOUSLY turned on by lesbian sex. which almost definately has a basis in genetics and fundamental instincts{seeing as to how widesperead and basic it is} . now being turned on by a women being done by you makes sense genetically, but being turned on by two women making out which has no part that YOU can play nor have children with, does NOT make sense on such basic genes{genes which are generally there to serve a purpose} and it certainly doesnt make sense to be MORE turned on by the thought of two women doing it than a man and a woman doing it.
No, I think of all the people in this shit thread, you're the only one not getting it (in more than one way). There is no "EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE" in watching porn.
So watch what ever porn you happen to fancy, jerk off; don't worry about evolution.
Originally posted by Bicnarok
me neither.Its just another perversion like all homosexuality, animal fetish and child abuse IMO.
You trolling idiot. So two consenting adults having sex with each other is the equivalent of raping animals or children.
BTW, you having oral or anal sex with a woman, would also be a "perversion", by your p.o.v.
Edit, Bardock-fool beat me to it.
So, I don't understand why the thread is asking about evolution? Are we supposed to argue wheter or not heterosexual men being attracted to lesbian porn is an evolutionary dead end trait, like male homosexuality? Or maybe that straight men being attracted to lesbian porn implies that homosexuality is not somehow genetic?
I don't get it.
So, leonheartmm states that men get aroused by heterosexual porn because they are genetically programmed to procreate which makes heterosexual porn serve an evolutionary significance. This would also be the reason why men are not attracted to gay porn, no procreation is possible.
But on the other hand, men also do get attracted and aroused by lesbian porn while it doesn' t lead to reproduction either and consequently serves no evolutionary significance, which he doesn' t understand.
Right?
Originally posted by Storm
So, leonheartmm states that men get aroused by heterosexual porn because they are genetically programmed to procreate which makes heterosexual porn serve an evolutionary significance. This would also be the reason why men are not attracted to gay porn, no procreation is possible.But on the other hand, men also do get attracted and aroused by lesbian porn while it doesn' t lead to reproduction either and consequently serves no evolutionary significance, which he doesn' t understand.
Right?
But, what about women?
I've known a number of women that honestly find porn repulsive. Any kind of porn.
Originally posted by Storm
So, leonheartmm states that men get aroused by heterosexual porn because they are genetically programmed to procreate which makes heterosexual porn serve an evolutionary significance. This would also be the reason why men are not attracted to gay porn, no procreation is possible.But on the other hand, men also do get attracted and aroused by lesbian porn while it doesn' t lead to reproduction either and consequently serves no evolutionary significance, which he doesn' t understand.
Right?
He has no idea what he's talking about, come on, the subject is porn and how it relates to evolution.
Personally, I get turned on my lesbian porn and want to procreate.
Originally posted by Devil King
But, what about women?I've known a number of women that honestly find porn repulsive. Any kind of porn.
They're just saying that, to be proper.
My wife prefers watching lesbian porn, as she doesn't find porn-guys in hetero films all that attractive. Sure they're hung, but generally trollish looking.