Superman vs. Wonder Woman

Started by bluewaterrider155 pages
Originally posted by Star428
The kryptonite ring offset the sun amping. Besides, Superman wasn't amped when he first grabbed Diana by the neck and took her the sun now was he? She couldn't do jack about it. I'm fairly certain that if he wanted DD dead then Diana would be dead from being knocked in the sun.

Sure about that?

I've had Superman supporters lining up to tell me he's been able to all but ignore kryptonite even under normal conditions, let alone when the sun looms so large in the background that they appear as flying insects.

The initial charge bothers me very little. We're given a time readout by Max that suggests the entirety of the fight from sun back to Earth and then Earth until they reach the battle's starting point was all of about 90 seconds. On the way Diana was being slammed through buildings, taken out of the atmosphere into the cold vacuum of space, and being blasted in the face with the most intense heat vision Rucka could have Superman muster.

Compare a similar showing of Diana to Amazo in Justice League of America #24.
Sends a robot with strength stated as GREATER than Superman and Diana herself combined through TWELVE layers of reinforced steel and concrete and begins shoving him, strength-test style, toward a portal to Antares.
Would anybody conclude Diana was stronger than Amazo because of that?
And every moment they got closer Superman would be expected to get stronger, free from the filtering of Earth's atmosphere.

You're wrong that she couldn't have done jack about it.
Despite her talking about needing to free her hands, her hands were NOT bound.

She had access to her tiara and direct access to Superman's own face.

There's no such thing as she couldn't have taken that thing off her head and slashed him in eyes, face, or throat to halt their progress. She's demonstrated similar movements in other fights, perhaps most famously in her skirmish with Genocide.

Here -- it's easy to illustrate; tell me how, with her hands free and cutting tiara in the reach of either hand, Superman holds Diana AND protects himself from a maneuver like the following:

Originally posted by SquallX
Oh please, Kal wanted to kill Doomsday, no where did it state he wanted to make him suffer first. I don't remember reading that part in the story.

Throughout the whole fight, Diana's mind set was to get to Lord. She fought an amp Kal without even going all out.

Hell, if Diana went into that fight with the mindset to kill Kal, she would have done so, and she would have been better geared up.

Maybe you didn't read all the chapters of sacrifice, it was not only one comic you know?

I think I already posted those scans before.

Originally posted by carver9
So you admit they were at the sun?

Lol you are funny and transparent dude.

I have said that yes I believe they are close to the sun, but that does not mean superman is sun amped, not that he was even sun amped at the beginning of the fight anyway and I have said this before.

If superman is emanating plasma he is sunamped, otherwise he is only 100% charged.

That also depends on the writer who most likely will expkain if such condition exist.

In this case the K and the sun appeared to offset each other.

But if you want to believe superman was sun amped be my guest, he wasn't at the beginning of the fight and will only work when he was exposed to the Kriptonite.

You will have to.prove that he was sunamped if that is what you want to claim I/e emanating plasma or giving powers to others will be a good sign. 😉

Originally posted by SquallX
Oh please, Kal wanted to kill Doomsday, no where did it state he wanted to make him suffer first. I don't remember reading that part in the story.

Throughout the whole fight, Diana's mind set was to get to Lord. She fought an amp Kal without even going all out.

Hell, if Diana went into that fight with the mindset to kill Kal, she would have done so, and she would have been better geared up.


That's why it was stated in Booster Gold by Geoff Johns that Max Lord couldn't make Superman kill anybody?

Originally posted by Rao Kal El

Maybe you didn't read all the chapters of sacrifice, it was not only one comic you know?

Sacrifice was a 4 part series, Salsa.

Chapter 4 was the marquee fight itself, Wonder Woman #219, Volume 2.

Whatever issue you got your scans from came after the main series and 4 of 4 chapters were completed. Check the cover and first page of WW219 if you don't believe me.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
I answered this question more than two years ago. My answer hasn't changed all that much. Difference in THIS thread is that people are now on record saying:
"No, you're right ... it makes zero sense to assume Superman was not close enough to the sun to receive considerable amping during that fight".

In answer to your specific question, therefore, yes, if Superman had successfully punched Diana towards the sun, more than likely he would have won in under a minute. The whole [b]point of the WW219 fight as far as Rucka was concerned was to be so deadly serious that the only feasible results were the death of Diana, Clark, Max himself, or some combination of these 3. [/B]

You do know that writer have different points of view on weather being at certain distance to the sun will amp superman or not right?

Byrne superman did not got extra boost for being close to suns, neither Jurgens Superman.

So close to the sun or outside atmosphere is not = to an insta boost.
That depends on the writer

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Sacrifice was a 4 part series, Salsa.

Chapter 4 was the marquee fight itself, Wonder Woman #219, Volume 2.

Whatever issue you got your scans from came after the main series and 4 of 4 chapters were completed. Check the cover and first page of WW219 if you don't believe me.

Let me rephrase this in a better way, so there is no misunderstandings;

Adventures of Superman 643 IS Sacrifice aftermath writen by Greg Rucka

And yes, that will be consideref part of the arc, is even included on the tpb IIRC

Quote by Squallx:

"Hell, if Diana went into that fight with the mindset to kill Kal, she would have done so".

Prove it... Oh, that's right. You can't. If Superman knew who he was actually fighting then there's no way in Hell she could kill him. I don't give a ***damn what her mindset is. I'm beginning to think you're just trolling so I'm not wasting my time on this thread anymore. Just keep ignoring all the fights between them that proves Superman is much superior. Ignore his superior feats. Ignore the fact that he goes toe-to-toe and often defeats characters that would squash Diana in a few panels. Ignore the fact that Diana outright admitted she can't beat Kal.... I'm done here.

WW is out of her league in this matchup. Superman 10/10.

Oh yeah, forgot to add:

Ignore the fact that Superman was at a huge disadvantage in their Sacrifice fight yet despite this he still could've easily killed her while they were at the sun but instead he decided to torture DD. Ignore the fact that he grabbed her by the neck and took her all the way to the sun in no time and she couldn't do jack**** about it. Ignore the fact that later on in their fight back on Earth she was hiding from him because she knew that a sneak attack was the only way that she could even slow him down. Just ignore the fact that if Darkseid has trouble killing Clark with the "mindset to kill him" then there's no way in hell Diana possibly can.

Just keep conveniently ignoring all these facts and keep saying WW wins. LOL. You remind me of Quan debating in the Viktor vs Marcus thread.

Originally posted by Star428
Oh yeah, forgot to add:

Ignore the fact that Superman was at a huge disadvantage in their Sacrifice fight yet despite this he still could've easily killed her while they were at the sun but instead he decided to torture DD. Ignore the fact that he grabbed her by the neck and took her all the way to the sun in no time and she couldn't do jack**** about it. Ignore the fact that later on in their fight back on Earth she was hiding from him because she knew that a sneak attack was the only way that she could even slow him down. Just ignore the fact that if Darkseid has trouble killing Clark with the "mindset to kill him" then there's no way in hell Diana possibly can.

Just keep conveniently ignoring all these facts and keep saying WW wins. LOL. You remind me of Quan debating in the Viktor vs Marcus thread.

You need to calm down.

just put Blue on ignore.

Originally posted by Zack Fair
You need to calm down.

just put Blue on ignore.

Ok. Yeah, I see now that Squall at least thinks Superman would win. My apologies to him for mistakenly thinking he was the one who was saying WW wins. Still, the idea that WW can beat Superman with the mindset to kill him is ludicrous if Superman is in his right mind.

Originally posted by Star428

the idea that WW can beat Superman with the mindset to kill him is ludicrous if Superman is in his right mind.

The writer of Wonder Woman #611 disagrees with you.

WARNING: Graphic and rather violent showing. Get parent's permission before clicking and viewing these images if you are under 13.

Originally posted by Rao Kal El
Let me rephrase this in a better way, so there is no misunderstandings;

Adventures of Superman 643 IS Sacrifice aftermath written by Greg Rucka

And yes, that will be considered part of the arc, is even included on the tpb IIRC

Entiendo lo que trata decir, pero, este es no manera en que escribir la frase en ingles.

Escribe lo que occurir despues "Sacrifice".

Digo la verdad:

wtf.

I'm still waiting for a response to the following, by the way.

That tiara is NOT an exclusively thrown weapon despite the number of people who seem to think it is.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider

You're wrong [in saying] that [Wonder Woman] couldn't have done jack about [being taken to the sun in issue 219].
Despite her talking about needing to free her hands, [Diana's] hands were NOT bound.

She had access to her tiara and direct access to Superman's own face.

There's no such thing as she couldn't have taken that thing off her head and slashed him in eyes, face, or throat to halt their progress.

She's demonstrated similar movements in other fights, perhaps most famously in her skirmish with Genocide.

Here -- it's easy to illustrate; tell me how, with her hands free and cutting tiara in the reach of either hand, Superman holds Diana AND protects himself from a maneuver like the following:

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=14845490

Originally posted by Zack Fair
wtf.

Good catch -- "trata" was the form of the verb I needed to use, not "trato".

I made the correction accordingly.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=14845490

Originally posted by Star428
I would like to see a scan of Superman saying he wasn't holding back against BA and that BA was holding back. If it's the fight I'm thinking about that happened in Metropolis in a comic from many years ago then I'm pretty sure he was holding back up until the end. At the end, I remember a civilian being nearly killed because of BA's actions and Superman getting very angry at BA. BA saw the anger in Superman's eyes and knew he was about to let loose on him. BA didn't want to fight an enraged Superman. So when Superman came at him BA turned his back on him and put his arms in the air as if conceding and letting Clark know he wouldn't fight him any longer. He knew Superman would not hit someone who wouldn't fight him and he made a wise move it turns out because Superman stopped his charge just at the last moment. Superman told him he did the right thing because that last punch would've broke the moon in half or something similar. So, if that's the fight the guy's referring to I don't see hopw in the hell that proves BA is superior to Superman. Superman was holding back like he nearly always does until the end. BA did not fight a Superman who was going all out. At least, not on that occasion.

He doesn't say he's "not holding back." He narrates about how careful he has to be because of how fragile humans are, and he's lucky when he's "most ticked off" that he's facing Black Adam. So all it really proves is Superman's annoyed and is facing someone he can hit. There's nothing indicating he's going all-out like I've seen people claim. It's carver being carter when he brings it up. He's trying to use that to lowball Superman against Wonder Woman. Superman didn't try the same thing on Adam as he successfully did against Wonder Woman, he wasn't in the same mindset as in SACRIFICE, and even under normal circumstances, Black Adam is stronger and more powerful than Wonder Woman, but that writer had the opinion that Adam was stronger than Captain Marvel who is stronger than Wonder Woman.

So, Wonder Woman<Captain Marvel=Black Adam<Superman>/=Gail Simone's Black Adam, even if Superman tried grabbing Adam by the throat and dragging him out. Carter's argument is either a poor interpretation of the comics or intentionally misleading.

Originally posted by dial J for Josh
I have been coming in and out of this thread and have been reading a lot of post. Just wondering, I see a lot of arguments going on against Carver and want to know what exactly happened? Is it due to Carvers stance on the victor of this thread? Or did he make a bizarre claim? There are so many pages on this thread that I don't feel like fully back tracking. Just wondering what's going on.

It's Carter being clueless on the topic but doesn't want to admit it. Or he doesn't realize how badly he's getting owned. That's likely as well.

Originally posted by carver9
Not the reason. As I've stated before, I am not prepared for a battlezone and honestly, I don't care for them. Someone can challenge me in a battlezone in regards to Hulk being a 50 toner and I wouldn't accept it because even if I won, it wouldn't change anything, AND, it's time consuming, time that I'm not wasting to put effort into a comic character. If Delta wants to debate about a character, we can do it here where I can post on my terms, whenever I want, without any rules and without me doing research through 100's' of comics just to find a worthy scan.

I don't buy your BS. You're afraid. You said you think I'm afraid to debate you, in your PM, and this was after I gave you the link to my reply to YOU that you had BEEN dodging. You can't pull your "I didn't see it" crap because I pointed it out to you numerous times in this thread when you replied, and also made note in other threads. I think I even messaged you about it on Xbox LIVE. No, you know you're going to get destroyed on this topic, and you don't want judges to break your metaphorical legs so you can't do your mental gymnastics to claim you beat me in the debate. Your denial and excuses does not change that.

Originally posted by SquallX
I guess we magically forgot that Diana herself claimed she was holding back.

Kal wins, but no way is he winning this fight against a Diana that wishes to kill him as easily as some posters here are claiming.

Originally posted by SquallX
Oh please, Kal wanted to kill Doomsday, no where did it state he wanted to make him suffer first. I don't remember reading that part in the story.

Throughout the whole fight, Diana's mind set was to get to Lord. She fought an amp Kal without even going all out.

Hell, if Diana went into that fight with the mindset to kill Kal, she would have done so, and she would have been better geared up.

She said she was BARELY holding back.

Everybody misses that part, and the Diana supporters ignore it when brought to their attention. As for Superman wanting "Doomsday" to suffer, I'll let ya off on that one since you probably didn't read the follow-up comic. Here Superman thinks about the fight, and we see things from his perspective.

And people just assume Superman was amped. The box the Kryptonite was in didn't melt when it should have if they were so close to the Sun, somehow the Sun was suddenly moved(more likely they weren't that lose to it and the perspective just changed), there was no mention whatsoever that he was amped by either Diana or Max, and apparently the author stated they never got past Venus in his script. You would think if he intended Supes to be amped there might have been something mentioned by Diana or Max.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Indeed.
He might be better served to issue his challenges via private messaging.
I'll be surprised if Pr doesn't say something to him if he keeps posting the way he's been going on for the last two pages or so.

If Pr says anything, we'll cross that bridge when it gets here. The fact is, carter NEEDS the challenge to be public due to his mental gymnastics.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
The reverse was shown as well. In fact, if we're going by Sacrifice, Wonder Woman can kill Superman even faster, even after being punched millions of miles away, choked, burned, frozen, down to the use of one strong hand, and with scarcely more than a flick of her wrist.

Assuming she's wearing her standard outfit, at least.

Yes, when he's not in his right mind and couldn't avoid the tiara. Too bad for her that he is in his right mind here. If he were in his right mind AND as determined, she wouldn't survive that long.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
There is no mention of that in the issue in which the actual fight takes place.
And Greg Rucka, in an interview which Pr confirmed as legit, himself says that Superman was going all out, trying to kill Doomsday, period.

What you're talking about is a follow up issue where Superman relates untrustworthy memories to Lois. Interestingly, people who want to take that issue as gospel seldom relate that Superman himself thinks "I can't even save myself", as he finds his throat being slashed open by Wondy's tiara.

Doesn't matter whether it was in the comic or not, because it's in a canon comic, and written by the same writer no less(of course even if it wasn't Rucka it'd still be canon). And in all reality, it doesn't really contradict Rucka's interview. You citing his interview hurts your argument more than helps it.

And like I said, canon(and under the same writer so no excuse on that), no matter what spin you put on "untrustworthy). And of course Superman couldn't defend against an attack he wouldn't be aware of. There was distance between him and Doomsday, and suddenly Doomsday was there punching his throat. Or elbowing him it seems. Superman thought he was at the Daily Planet and Jimmy was dead, further proving the telepathic illusion he was under.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Your skill with images is impressive, Salsa.
Rightly did I praise you for them.

However, what you're saying doesn't make sense in the context of the scene, and certainly not, if we want to adopt Delta's supposed "real life" stance, going by common sense logic.

If you're of the mind that Superman flew Diana to the sun, and you've said you are, then you're assuming Superman was flying with Diana at the rate of several million miles per second.

That's a LOT of forward momentum.

We're shown Superman lose his grip as he is turned aside by Diana's eye gouge;
presumably he gets doubled over by a quick strike to the groin or something similar in the process.

He was traveling like a rocket a millisecond before that gouge and presumed strike and during it at the rate of several million miles a second.
Does it make sense to assume he just stopped dead in his tracks at that point, or that he kept going aways?

No matter how much you protest, the only that makes good sense is the latter; that the momentum of several million miles per second thrust kept him going for at least a few yards past Diana. And his target was the sun. So he's closer to the sun than she was.

So the position when she then rushes him is:
Earth --> Diana --> Superman --> Sun

... and when he punches her with all his might sending her back from the direction she came, it's:

Earth <-- Diana <-- Superman <-- Sun.

Which is exactly what we see.

And, more importantly, the thing that actually makes good common sense.

In fact, to speed Delta's own reply to this thread, we can illustrate in "real life" human terms what happens when an attacker, barreling forward, is turned aside from their rush.
They DON'T just stop dead in their tracks:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhVbdRdXliw

I know what you're trying to argue, but it doesn't really support your stance, especially since Superman can quickly stop, and there's nothing indicating there was a huge distance covered between when Diana was free and the punch happened. The Sun appears to suddenly move, the lead box doesn't melt, there's no mention of an amp, and the writer seems to say that in his script it never got past Venus. Simplest conclusion is they weren't near the Sun, the art just looks like they were 'cuz the Sun is BIG.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
mmm

Should I be given pause that the posters with the most notorious reputations are relative moderates here, while the man who is ostensibly the supreme moderate is [b]the most extreme?

Pr: 10/10
Star428: 9/10
h1a8: 8/10
Zack Fair: 7/10
carver9: 6/10 [/B]

Based on what Pr said to Carter, I believe his take is she can give him a good fight, but ultimately it will be a losing battle every time, without any extenuating circumstances, simply because he's just above her. You look at the fights they've had without extenuating circumstances and that pretty much supports it. Hell, even when he's handicapped, he comes-out looking significantly above her and she gets technical wins due to those circumstances.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
I'd be interested in seeing how much people think it takes to knock Superman out.

Certainly it doesn't take more than Wondy has to bloody Clark,
or knock him away ... as a herald of lesser caliber than Diana herself proved:

Source: Justice Society of America #13, Volume 3
Writer: Geoff Johns
Pencillers: Dale Eaglesham & Alex Ross
Date: February 2008

That's not the big deal you're making it out to be. The elbow is a lot harder than the fist and has a smaller area, you can produce almost as much power with an elbow strike as a punch(and focused in a smaller, harder area), and Hercules is hitting Superman in the nose, which is comparatively weak. It doesn't really prove anything but Hercules is strong enough to give Supes a bloody nose(with an elbow strike). And before you go to your "that's real world fighting" crutch of a defense, even Pre-DOS, in Superman's worst showing against Lobo(who is stronger than Wonder Woman, and wouldn't hold back like she normally does either) took around a dozen attacks(not all punches, some slamming Superman's head into the environment, but some kicks as well) and couldn't KO him. He's had many fights with opponents stronger than her, in many cases, MUCH stronger than her, and them either failing to KO him, or taking a whole lot of strikes to accomplish it. She certain failed to KO him with her kicks(one a sneak attack, the other him in a vulnerable position) in A LEAGUE OF ONE and couldn't KO him in other instances. Hell, in DOOMSDAY WARS it took Brainiac-Doomsday(who is WAY stronger than Wonder Woman) like 9 attacks(and he used a mind-blast mixed in, too) to finally KO Superman, and Supes was trying to protect Lana and Pete's premature born baby, and unable to properly brace himself. So it wouldn't be easy for her to KO him even if he stands there and lets her hit him.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
You're actually illustrating why it's a good idea to have a thread where things like this can be discussed. Your showing here, for instance, is taken from a story called "The 10th Circle", one of John Byrne's JLA arcs.

I seriously wonder how many people wrongly think Superman actually knocked Diana out in this encounter and precisely the way you're showing us.

In point of fact, that is only the opening blow of a skirmish between these two (Superman is being controlled by a vampire named "Crucifer" here), and she goes on to fight not only Superman, but several demon-like helpers and the main villain as well. She falls to Crucifer, of course, but acquits herself quite well against Superman himself, not at all what people would think if they're exposed only to that image and nothing else.

I think he was trolling you(but hey, dunno for sure). Anyways, Diana doesn't come-out looking as good as you're arguing if we take context into account. First, Superman is handicapped by Crucifer's control. Second, he's in less than peak condition since he's been fed on by Crucifer and hasn't been able to recharge. Third, outside what Crucifer did when he physically got involved(instead of through Superman), there were a whole two vampires that jumped in, and they weren't all that. Stronger than human? Yes, but not so much that Batman wasn't able to hold his own against a couple. At best they were a distraction. Fourth, the fact that Nudge there helped Wonder Woman. She was able to temporarily break Crucifer's hold over Superman. In all honesty, I think Power Girl comes out looking better than Wonder Woman when she fought a mind controlled Superman in JSA, when you compare the two and all context.

Originally posted by bluewaterrider
Sure about that?

I've had Superman supporters lining up to tell me he's been able to all but ignore kryptonite even under normal conditions, let alone when the sun looms so large in the background that they appear as flying insects.

The initial charge bothers me very little. We're given a time readout by Max that suggests the entirety of the fight from sun back to Earth and then Earth until they reach the battle's starting point was all of about 90 seconds. On the way Diana was being slammed through buildings, taken out of the atmosphere into the cold vacuum of space, and being blasted in the face with the most intense heat vision Rucka could have Superman muster.

Compare a similar showing of Diana to Amazo in Justice League of America #24.
Sends a robot with strength stated as GREATER than Superman and Diana herself combined through TWELVE layers of reinforced steel and concrete and begins shoving him, strength-test style, toward a portal to Antares.
Would anybody conclude Diana was stronger than Amazo because of that?
And every moment they got closer Superman would be expected to get stronger, free from the filtering of Earth's atmosphere.

You're wrong that she couldn't have done jack about it.
Despite her talking about needing to free her hands, her hands were NOT bound.

She had access to her tiara and direct access to Superman's own face.

There's no such thing as she couldn't have taken that thing off her head and slashed him in eyes, face, or throat to halt their progress. She's demonstrated similar movements in other fights, perhaps most famously in her skirmish with Genocide.

Here -- it's easy to illustrate; tell me how, with her hands free and cutting tiara in the reach of either hand, Superman holds Diana AND protects himself from a maneuver like the following:

Me, personally I don't think the Kryptonite would've had a major effect no matter where they were. Weaken him? In the sense of driving out/replacing some of his sunlight, but so little it wouldn't be noticeable. But anyways.....

You REALLY think so poorly of Wonder Woman's durability that she can't handle the cold of space without it contributing to her being KTFOed with one punch? That's sure how I'm reading it considering what you're writing. More than once I've seen her fine in space. Maybe needs an air supply, but not hurt by the cold or lack of pressure. And that really wasn't that great of heat vision.

REALLY? You're bringing-up the Amazo fight? That's not comparable, AT ALL. I repeat. That's not comparable. AT ALL . Well, maybe I should rephrase that. It's not at all comparable, if you're honest.

First, what did Superman do to Wonder Woman? He grabbed her by the throat and dragged her into space.

She tried and tried and tried to break his grip with strength and technique and failed. What did Wonder Woman do to Amazo? Fly down and slams into him with her fists. In fact her narration specifically states she builds-up speed and catches him by surprise, and she drives him through all that before he can get his bearings, so he's not resisting her(when she was most certainly resisting Superman).

That's about as similar as pizza and an ant hill. To call them similar is only correct in the most superficial sense, and is either a poor interpretation of the comics or flat-out dishonesty to argue. But look at end of the last scan. You claim she begins shoving him "strength test style." But he's ALREADY on the ground so at a serious leverage disadvantage. And he's still overpowering her rather easily. Then Batman tries to come to the rescue. What happens?

He gets sent flying while Amazo restrains her with ONE HAND around her throat. That's much more like what Superman did to Wonder Woman(although one-handed makes it more impressive). Is she able to break Amazo's grip?

Well, not in what happened before Zatanna came to the rescue. So no, Blue, this is not at all what you tried to argue.

And to answer your question, in the mindset he was in, yes, she probably could've successfully used the tiara to get free. Problem is, you arguing that just reinforces how weak she is compared to him, and if he was not thinking he was facing Doomsday and still had the same intent, he could do a number of things to keep her from attacking with her tiara despite having her throat in her hands. He could blind her with heat vision(he has blinded people with it before), headbutt her to keep her distracted, use his freeze breath to keep her from easily getting to it. It'd be for her to get it with ice all over her face while she's blind and he keeps encasing her head again when she tries to break it. Of course, only if he's aware of the actual situation and not thinking she's Doomsday.

Originally posted by Delta1938

you probably didn't read the follow-up comic. Here Superman thinks about the fight, and we see things from his perspective.

And people just assume Superman was amped. The box the Kryptonite was in didn't melt when it should have if they were so close to the Sun, somehow the Sun was suddenly moved(more likely they weren't that lose to it and the perspective just changed), there was no mention whatsoever that he was amped by either Diana or Max, and apparently the author stated they never got past Venus in his script. You would think if he intended Supes to be amped there might have been something mentioned by Diana or Max.

You don't seem to be as much in the habit of sending text walls as you used to be, as a result your posts are more concise and easier to respond to.
I'll give a few responses to some of these items; later, if and when I have the time, I'll marry them to scans and images.

1) Memories are not particularly trustworthy in comics. Other stories show that Superman actually has quite an ego and does not like to admit when things are going hard for him. Good example is Busiek's Trinity series where he wants to take on Konvickt and makeup for the knockout the monster scored on him.

If you want to take his memories firm, though, how come you're ignoring the part where he says "I couldn't even save myself!" when he find his throat slashed open by the tiara? I've not yet seen a Superman fan emphasize THAT part ...

2) People assume that Superman was amped because it does not make much sense to assume he was NOT amped. That's especially true if you'd read the stories about 2 years before, during, and after this period (the year 2005), especially regarding his cousin, introduced at roughly this time.

Are we really to assume Greg Rucka knew so little about Superman that he forgot THAT basic element of the character and how his powers work?
I honestly would not assume a comic writer would feel great need to point that out. To be fair though, before resuming readership of DC comics with the re-intro of Kara, I'd been in the habit of reading the Marvel Comics of previous years, including old 1980s Spider-Man and X-Men stories.

A bit more subtle, these. Not everything spelled out for the reader.
In fact, there were at least one or two storylines I remember where the books were drafted as serial mysteries where the audience would write in and guess what was really going on and what would happen next. "Who is the Hobgoblin?" and "The Mystery of Jean DeWolf" come to mind.

On the other hand, even in many of the DC comics around this period changes were quiet, though dramatic, and unannounced. I believe I pointed one such change out to you much earlier that is relevant to this thread, and that being the increasing durability of Wonder Woman relative to earlier years.
Another good change example would be her increasing skill and reputation as a warrior in comicdom, something nearly absent from the Perez and John Byrne days, at least from what I can tell.

3) "Real world" considerations have to be balanced with how well comic writers are AWARE of real world consideration and to what extent they are skilled at portraying them, given the needs of the story they want to tell.

To return to the "sun-amp" thing, for instance, you yourself earlier posted Superman taking on Mongul, even as he alluded to Muhammad Ali's "rope a dope". Prominent in that showing is Superman saying to Mongul that THE TROPICAL SUN AT THAT LATITUDE continually recharged him, giving him far greater stamina ...