Comic Book Mythbuster

Started by Philosophía29 pages

Originally posted by darthgoober
My scans don't state that strength isn't a factor, they state that there's something else at work. Again, I can totally understand how someone might interpret the scans I post to mean that strength's not a factor, but now you're arguing over interpretation of the scans and my opinion is just as valid as yours on the matter. You believe what you want, and I'll believe what I want, but I'll continue to post my scans as evidence until a rule is passed against posting scans from Byrne. And I can almost guarantee that such a policy will never be put into place because it means people will start shouting for similar policies instituted against Loeb, Enis, or any other author that they don't like and can come up with a half assed reason supported by two scans for their work to be considered completely rectonned.

Let me try to point out what's wrong with what you're wanting to do by throwing out feats from the Bryne's era using a slightly different example. Supes has FTL feats to his credit, right? Well Mcduffie says that Supes can't even hit lightspeed without entering hyperspace, and if we use your system of throwing out everything that might be rectonned, it means that if Mcduffie ever gets around to putting Supes using hyperspace in a comic we'll have to throw out EVERY single speed feat of Supes's from before Mcduffie took over since the nature of Supes's speed has been effectively rectonned. And it doesn't matter if later writers of Supes give him speed feats that justify the FTL feats right along the same lines as the Pre-Mcduffie feats(just as later writers attributed Supes's powers to telekinesis in a manner similar to Byrne) because according to the standard you're espousing, those feats will still have been rectonned at one point and will therefore never be applicable again. Now do you see the problem here? You posted two scans that kinda contradict the scans I posted and think it's enough to throw out the whole period, but no one in their right mind is going to agree with a precedent that would allow TWO instances from Mcduffie to alter everything about the character.

Unless they've rectonned the actual story that my scans took place in, it means that Supes still moved that ship with his strength being canceled out by the nullifiers. That means that my scans are still valid evidence of Supes's flight being a potential factor when he's moving something while flying. And if you're assuming that the story's been rectonned out of continuity just because Byrne was the writer, it means that ALL of Bryne's stories have been rectonned out of continuity(so my example of Matrix is valid).

So you're ignoring my scan and taking only yours into consideration because it's more ambigous since it says 'something other than strength' and you can twist its meaning to somehow support your non-existing argument, eventough the scan I posted is from the same era (Byrne era) written by the same author (Byrne) concerning the same ability (flying) and how it affects lifting things while in air for Superman (it makes it so that strength is not a factor) only mine is more clear in the sense that it's formulated in such a way that it makes it clear strength is not a factor point blank. Not to mention that even if we take only your scan (which is illogical) since his strengh was negated and he still moved the thing while flying, it still shows what my scan does (and logically so since they are the same thing), which is that strength is not a factor when moving things while flying. I'm speechless. Really.

I don't care what McDuffie says on some Message Board, I care for what he depicted on-panel, and what he depicted on-panel was that Superman can achieve FTL and nothing about Hyperspace was ever stated/shown. Not to mention he got kicked off the title so the chances of that happening are none. And even if that were the case, no, I don't see what the problem is. Currently it is stated that Superman works that way and for the forseeable future, that's the way they will work until another writer takes over and changes the nature of his powers again. It doesn't retconn the entire period, only that specified ability (like in this case not needing strength when moving objects while flying) and makes it non-applicable to current Superman, it doesn't retconn everything that has happened during that period. We mostly take it one at a time because if we apply the domino effect it will get us nowhere.

Originally posted by Philosophía
So you're ignoring my scan and taking only yours into consideration because it's more ambigous since it says 'something other than strength' and you can twist its meaning to somehow support your non-existing argument, eventough the scan I posted is from the same era (Byrne era) written by the same author (Byrne) concerning the same ability (flying) and how it affects lifting things while in air for Superman (it makes it so that strength is not a factor) only mine is more clear in the sense that it's formulated in such a way that it makes it clear strength is not a factor point blank. Not to mention that even if we take only your scan (which is illogical) since his strengh was negated and he still moved the thing while flying, it still shows what my scan does (and logically so since they are the same thing), which is that strength is not a factor when moving things while flying. I'm speechless. Really.

I don't care what McDuffie says on some Message Board, I care for what he depicted on-panel, and what he depicted on-panel was that Superman can achieve FTL and nothing about Hyperspace was ever stated/shown. Not to mention he got kicked off the title so the chances of that happening are none. And even if that were the case, no, I don't see what the problem is. Currently it is stated that Superman works that way and for the forseeable future, that's the way they will work until another writer takes over and changes the nature of his powers again. It doesn't retconn the entire period, only that specified ability (like in this case not needing strength when moving objects while flying) and makes it non-applicable to current Superman, it doesn't retconn everything that has happened during that period. We mostly take it one at a time because if we apply the domino effect it will get us nowhere.


Right, I'm going to ignore your scan because it's directly contradicted in later issue's and I'm going to keep on using mine because they're not directly contradicted... that's pretty much what I've been saying. As for it being illogical for Supes's to have been able to move it without his super strength without the effect your scan mentions, that would be the case if it weren't for later writers attributing the effect to something similar to tactile tk. You could give me tactile tk with no super strength at all and I could still move or lift anything my powers allowed for. Unless I'm mistaken, that's pretty much how Conner accomplished everything before his Kryptonian powers started kicking in.

Juntai already pointed out my error on McDuffie, but the point still stands as another McDuffie could be hired at any time. Now if you want to endorse a precedent that would allow some writer to throw out every speed feat from Supes before they took over have at it, I was just using that as an example of why that kind of thing is a bad idea(and I'm pretty sure that most members agree with me on that whether you do or not).

As I said before, unless the story my scans are from has been rectonned out of continuity, Supes still moved that ship with strength nullifiers on. Therefore it's still valid proof of his flight being a potential factor when he moves something while flying since Strength+flight thrust=>strength alone. If you choose not to accept that then that's your hang up, but your opinion alone isn't enough to invalidate my scans.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Right, I'm going to ignore your scan because it's directly contradicted in later issue's and I'm going to keep on using mine because they're not directly contradicted... that's pretty much what I've been saying. As for it being illogical for Supes's to have been able to move it without his super strength without the effect your scan mentions, that would be the case if it weren't for later writers attributing the effect to something similar to tactile tk. You could give me tactile tk with no super strength at all and I could still move or lift anything my powers allowed for. Unless I'm mistaken, that's pretty much how Conner accomplished everything before his Kryptonian powers started kicking in.

As I said before, unless the story my scans are from has been rectonned out of continuity, Supes still moved that ship with strength nullifiers on. Therefore it's still valid proof of his flight being a potential factor when he moves something while flying since Strength+flight thrust=>strength alone. If you choose not to accept that then that's your hang up, but your opinion alone isn't enough to invalidate my scans.

I'm just going to repost this until it sinks in.

Originally posted by Philosophía
So you're ignoring my scan and taking only yours into consideration because it's more ambigous since it says 'something other than strength' and you can twist its meaning to somehow support your non-existing argument, eventough the scan I posted is from the same era (Byrne era) written by the same author (Byrne) concerning the same ability (flying) and how it affects lifting things while in air for Superman (it makes it so that strength is not a factor) only mine is more clear in the sense that it's formulated in such a way that it makes it clear strength is not a factor point blank. Not to mention that even if we take only your scan (which is illogical) since his strengh was negated and he still moved the thing while flying, it still shows what my scan does (and logically so since they are the same thing), which is that strength is not a factor when moving things while flying. I'm speechless. Really.

You just simply fail to understand that the scans are talking/describing the same thing, only with different words and examples. In one of them we have Superman saying that he needs no strength in order to move things when flying an entire complex into space while in yours we have Superman proving that he doesn't need strength in order to move things while flying since he moves that ship with his strength nullified. Both of the instances say that he doesn't need to use strength while flying only with different words. Both are written by Byrne, the same guy who introduced this concept to Superman. This has become so repetitive and dumb I just see no further purpose continuing it.

Seriously.
Good day.

Originally posted by Philosophía
I'm just going to repost this until it sinks in.

You just simply fail to understand that the scans are talking/describing the same thing, only with different words and examples. In one of them we have Superman saying that he needs no strength in order to move things when flying an entire complex into space while in yours we have Superman proving that he doesn't need strength in order to move things while flying since he moves that ship with his strength nullified. Both of the instances say that he doesn't need to use strength while flying only with different words. Both are written by Byrne, the same guy who introduced this concept to Superman. This has become so repetitive and dumb I just see no further purpose continuing it.

Seriously.
Good day.


As I said, believe what you want. Just don't think that your opinion is enough to invalidate my scans. If the story still took place in DC canon then Supes still moved that ship, and the scans are still proof that Supes's major moving feats while flying are too ambiguous to classify as "feats of pure strength". It's not much of a stretch and actually falls into the "common sense" category IMO.

But hey, your opinion is your own so have fun with it...

Bump

Myth: That Daredevil owns Punisher in h2h and will win most of their fights easily

Daredevil section obvously.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=527917&pagenumber=3

Mythbusting

Majestic built a machine in nano-seconds

All majestic said here was that it took several nanoseconds longer than he planned and he took seconds to research for it. He also says that he was in twelfth thousands of a second to making of the machine and he had to scarp and rebuild it. The actual time it took to built him the machine isn't revealed but it surely wasn't in nanoseconds.

MYTH:
Captain marvel was created with flight instead of jumping, so he isn't a complete superman rip-off.

Just like the original Superman who inspired him:

Whiz Comics #2 (Millenium print)
_

WC #3

WC #4

There was no usage of the word "fly" during his early years. Instead, "leap" was the ability used.

For those who don't know, cap started flying in Whiz comics 5.

Originally posted by abhilegend
[B]Mythbusting

Majestic built a machine in nano-seconds

All majestic said here was that it took several nanoseconds longer than he planned and he took seconds to research for it. He also says that he was in twelfth thousands of a second to making of the machine and he had to scarp and rebuild it. The actual time it took to built him the machine isn't revealed but it surely wasn't in nanoseconds. [/B]

That isn't the nanosecond machine-building feat most commonly referred to, iirc. It's when he is in space, and flies back to his lab, builds some advanced tech, and flies back in nanoseconds. This doesn't debunk the supposed myth. I may be wrong here, but this scan just seems unfamiliar...I'm remembering another.

Originally posted by abhilegend
[b]MYTH:
Captain marvel was created with flight instead of jumping, so he isn't a complete superman rip-off.

Just like the original Superman who inspired him:

For those who don't know, cap started flying in Whiz comics 5. [/B]

Hm, as you said, Captain Marvel didn't start flying until Whiz Comics #5 (published June, 1940.) I'm not exactly sure when Superman officially began flying in the comic world, but I know that in Action Comics #29 (published October, 1940) Superman was still jumping/leaping, NOT flying.

...So Marvel was flying at LEAST 4 months before Supes, therefore Supes is a partial Marvel ripoff. 😛

Was it explained how Captain Marvel gained the power of flight?

Originally posted by Galan007
Hm, as you said, Captain Marvel didn't start flying until Whiz Comics #5 (published June, 1940.) I'm not exactly sure when Superman officially began flying in the comic world, but I know that in Action Comics #29 (published October, 1940) Superman was still jumping/leaping, NOT flying.

...So Marvel was flying at LEAST 4 months before Supes, therefore Supes is a partial Marvel ripoff. 😛


Superman was flying in his radio serial aired in Feb 1940, four months before the publication of whiz comics 5. Superman started flying in Action comics 35(April 1941), but he was gradually progressing in power before that and his jumps were getting more higher and long. Superman actually flew because of his Fleischer cartoons influencing the comic. If we're assuming that superman is a rip-off because of his flight, then he would be a rip-off of Namor who was the first SUPERHERO to fly and characters were flying before in comics.

Originally posted by Digi
That isn't the nanosecond machine-building feat most commonly referred to, iirc. It's when he is in space, and flies back to his lab, builds some advanced tech, and flies back in nanoseconds. This doesn't debunk the supposed myth. I may be wrong here, but this scan just seems unfamiliar...I'm remembering another.

Its the same scene.

Originally posted by Endless Mike
Was it explained how Captain Marvel gained the power of flight?

I don't recall that.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Superman was flying in his radio serial aired in Feb 1940, four months before the publication of whiz comics 5. Superman started flying in Action comics 35(April 1941), but he was gradually progressing in power before that and his jumps were getting more higher and long. Superman actually flew because of his Fleischer cartoons influencing the comic. If we're assuming that superman is a rip-off because of his flight, then he would be a rip-off of Namor who was the first SUPERHERO to fly and characters were flying before in comics.

I think Doctor Occult flew before Namor

Originally posted by abhilegend
Superman was flying in his radio serial aired in Feb 1940
Bull.

Originally posted by Galan007
Bull.

Nope, a child asks who is the flying man in the second episode IIRC and his father says its superman.

Thinking about busting the myth that Gungnir amps Odin. mmm

But I'm also lazy. mmm

Originally posted by abhilegend
Nope, a child asks who is the flying man in the second episode IIRC and his father says its superman.
I was just giving you a hard time.

Still though, Marv was the first to fly in canon comics... So at least he's got that. 😛

Originally posted by Galan007
I was just giving you a hard time.

Still though, Marv was the first to fly in canon comics... So at least he's got that. 😛


Yeah, cap was the first to fly in the comics, that's all he got.😉