James Cameron to announce Jesus tomb discovery.

I once worked with a Jesus(pronounced: "Hesus). Pretty nice guy, he was Hispanic though. Jim Caviezel(sp?) was Hispanic too..and he PLAYED Jesus in the Passion. Does everyone see where I'm going with this?

Jim Caviezel is gorgeous...i didnt know he was Hispanic

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
Jim Caviezel is gorgeous...i didnt know he was Hispanic

A 1 minute online search reveals that his father is Slovak/Italian and his mother is Irish American and he was born in the U.S.

So where does Thundar get that from ?

Originally posted by Thundar
I once worked with a Jesus(pronounced: "Hesus). Pretty nice guy, he was Hispanic though. Jim Caviezel(sp?) was Hispanic too..and he PLAYED Jesus in the Passion. Does everyone see where I'm going with this?

Your gay?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Your gay?

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

O shit...i didnt even figure that !!! There's nothing to be ashamed of Thundar, welcome to Analville droolio

you can get fragmented DNA from bones, enough to say this works and not enough to clone, and it doesn't really put away the he was resurrected even though the chances are... slim its that he physically ascended to heaven shortly after he came back

Did this thing ever pull through? Did he actually find where Jesus was buried?

Originally posted by Nellinator
DNA testing would simply show how the people in the tomb were related.

However, there is no possible way on linking that to Jesus...but I am sure they will try,

Which is why this whole thing has been stupid since first report.

Originally posted by Nellinator
DNA testing would simply show how the people in the tomb were related.

So in other words, it would prove nothing?

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
So in other words, it would prove nothing?

No, it would establish the relationships of the people in the tomb.

Bet we could just assume that and get it done faster and for less money.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
No, it would establish the relationships of the people in the tomb.

Obviously 🤓

but would do nothing in the way of proving the body is that of Jesus Christ. Or would it? I'm not smart so i need spoon fed. 📖

Originally posted by FeceMan
Bet we could just assume that and get it done faster and for less money.

money is an apparent result of this controversy. But take a look at the guy doing it. I can't recall the spelling of his name, but he's a tool. A jewish tool to bot. No agenda there....at all.

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
Obviously 🤓

but would do nothing in the way of proving the body is that of Jesus Christ. Or would it? I'm not smart so i need spoon fed. 📖

The DNA testing alone only establishes the relationships of the individuals buried in the tomb.

The DNA testing along with the statistical probability of the names and relationships of the individuals buried in the tomb coinciding with those of the biblical Jesus and his family is a strong inductive argument that this is the familial tomb of Jesus.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
The DNA testing alone only establishes the relationships of the individuals buried in the tomb.

The DNA testing along with the statistical probability of the names and relationships of the individuals buried in the tomb coinciding with those of the biblical Jesus and his family is a strong inductive argument that this is the familial tomb of Jesus.

thats what i was thinking, but considering that the biblical names of Jesus' family were of the most common names of the time, it then comes down merely to probability?

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
thats what i was thinking, but considering that the biblical names of Jesus' family were of the most common names of the time, it then comes down merely to probability?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Frequency of Names:

[list][*]Jesus, Son of Joseph: 1/190
[*]Mariamne: 1/160
[*]Matia: 1/40
[*]Maria: 1/4[/list]

Based on these results, it would appear that the names in and of themselves were not uncommon at the time. However, the chances of them being found together are an extremely remote 1 in 97,280,000.

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
thats what i was thinking, but considering that the biblical names of Jesus' family were of the most common names of the time, it then comes down merely to probability?

So now you have to ask: Would "God" chose the most common names? Surely he would not. But this situation doesn't mean "he" did. Botton line...aboandon "god" and Jesus, and Mohammad while you're at it...

None of them are worth your admiration...much less your understanding.

I think that a thread for this exists but I cannot locate it.

Anyhoo, these facts debunk the lie that Jesus' bones have been discovered in Jerusalem.

http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/historical-Jesus/the-Jesus-family-tomb/the-Jesus-family-tomb-9-facts-that-disprove-discovery-channel-lost-tomb-of-jesus.htm

😄