Fire does not burn Paper

Originally posted by Bicnarok
The paper in this video is clearly some office paper flying about, which could have come from anywhere, even offices not affected by the initial fire.Its not a passport which was in a closed object filled with Kerosene and went boom.

like i said...its from the area where the tower was hit...hence the most intense fire and within the explosion...how do i know this?...because the tower hasn't collapsed

unless you're arguing that someone on some unaffected floor started throwing reams of paper out of a window for the sake of it

not to mention that paper in the plane would have a better chance of surviving on the floors where the plane hit because they had inertia to clear the explosion and fire....

Please explain how Building 7 fell. It was not hit by a plane.

PS Fire burns Paper............. 😄

Originally posted by Katsu
Please explain how Building 7 fell. It was not hit by a plane.

PS Fire burns Paper............. 😄

we're not discussing building 7 are we?...i mean...you really should keep your own threads on topic instead of trying to misdirect it when you're beaten

Originally posted by Katsu
Fire burns Paper............. 😄

Point out the obvious to try and hide the fact that everyone you have argued with has assisted you in making making yourslef look like a moron. Excellent plan. You win. We're convinced.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Point out the obvious to try and hide the fact that everyone you have argued with has assisted you in making making yourslef look like a moron. Excellent plan. You win. We're convinced.

hahaha...i love it...that one tickles my funny bone

Originally posted by Katsu
Please explain how Building 7 fell. It was not hit by a plane.

if you're attempting to use the "buidlings dont collapse just from fire" argument...well i disproved that in the 9/11 thread by listing 7 buildings which did just that...and those were only the ones of the same construction type.

of course the difference between those building and WTC 7 is that those building didn't have 2 half a million ton buildings collapse next to them

Originally posted by jaden101
hahaha...i love it...that one tickles my funny bone

I can't take credit. It's not like they don't tee them up for us. Hell, half the time they even hand us the correct club.

Look here where Deano posted a link that answered his own question, unfortunately it wasn't the answer he was looking for:

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=476773&pagenumber=2

Originally posted by jaden101
if you're attempting to use the "buidlings dont collapse just from fire" argument...well i disproved that in the 9/11 thread by listing 7 buildings which did just that...and those were only the ones of the same construction type.

of course the difference between those building and WTC 7 is that those building didn't have 2 half a million ton buildings collapse next to them

Larry Silverstein, owner of WTC and building 7 himself said that they PULLED building 7. They BLEW UP building 7 using explosives. So, now its owner of building 7 vs kid on some forum named jaden. You lose! Building 7 DID not went down due to fire. VIDEOPROOF below. You lose again!

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9b4D-aO3zY

PS Fire burns Paper.........

why are you making your own thread go off topic??...beaten???

and even if it was a controlled demolition...it's spurious to say that it takes months to prep a building to be ready for demolition...i know this cause I'VE ACTUALLY HELP PREPARE A BUILDING FOR DEMOLITION...and that work that takes months is the stripping a building to a bare shell...the removal of all non supporting walls...bathroom fitting, piping and water tanks...kitchen fittings (this is in my case which was a 21 story high-rise residential building)...the actual planting of explosives on a non emergency case can take at most a couple of days but can easily be speeded up if needed

Originally posted by jaden101
why are you making your own thread go off topic??...beaten???

Why are you not answering my question?

Now thats BEATEN.

Larry Silverstein has beaten you. Accept your defeat and take it like a man. All of a sudden your talking about this topic going offtopic. This topic was going offtopic when you started posting. The topic was about the media lying to us. Not if it was possible for some paper passport to survive an explosion. SHEER IMPOSSIBLE, show us pictures of paper surviving those explosions please!

Building 7 was rigged. So were the Twin Towers. Virtual Free Fall speed! Read Sir Isaac Newtons theories on this.

Originally posted by Katsu
Not if it was possible for some paper passport to survive an explosion.

I think he's proven that many times in this thread as well... and if he's proven this, then your little 'theory' about the government lying to us on this case is fruitless to say the least.

You're using this to say the government is lying to us, but if it is possible for paper to survive this sort of thing, then this thread makes you look like a misinformed ass hat (especially the way you are acting here).

Meh.

😬

Originally posted by Katsu
Why are you not answering my question?

Now thats BEATEN.

Larry Silverstein has beaten you. Accept your defeat and take it like a man. All of a sudden your talking about this topic going offtopic. This topic was going offtopic when you started posting. The topic was about the media lying to us. Not if it was possible for some paper passport to survive an explosion. SHEER IMPOSSIBLE, show us pictures of paper surviving those explosions please!

Building 7 was rigged. So were the Twin Towers. Virtual Free Fall speed! Read Sir Isaac Newtons theories on this.

disproved your point already with acutal science and observation...the building fell at nowhere near freefall speed...do try and keep up

We want pictures of PAPER surviving the explosions. PROOF PLEASE!

You have none, you are a liar and your pants are on Fire.

Originally posted by Katsu
We want pictures of PAPER surviving the explosions. PROOF PLEASE!

You have none, you are a liar and your pants are on Fire.

i've posted several videos of it already....clearly you only see what you want to see.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=s_gdCrmbrIg

5m 10s...where else is the paper coming from?...the moon?...some special air balloon dropping it from above the tower?...no...it comes from the tower...from the area where the explosion is...before the towers fall

not really rocket science but still i know it's difficult for your feeble brain to comprehend

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=aJo43PCHfDY

a small example of how much survived

Except the passport would be in the plane, not the tower.

as i've said before...that means the passport would have interia and have and ever better chance of escaping the fire

Ummm, have you ever seen Final Destination? In the opening sequence the Plane blows up. Big Explosion. LOTS OF FVCKING FIRE! The pass port would be incinerated in the explosion, or be buried under rubble amd ripped apart.

Originally posted by Furion
Ummm, have you ever seen Final Destination? In the opening sequence the Plane blows up. Big Explosion. LOTS OF FVCKING FIRE! The pass port would be incinerated in the explosion, or be buried under rubble amd ripped apart.

well you see...there's films...and then there's real life...

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=faID6yLpaqo

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=trADmnhLikM

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eVzVPXswmOA

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=-flrm49Pul8

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Avc7YKP-ML0

paper paper paper paper paper

I want to see VIDEOS of a PAPER PASSPORT in a persons pockett flying a BOEING 747 hitting the WTC.

PROOF PLEASE!

Your videos dont apply to the situation at hand. Fool!