Originally posted by McLovin
Sure he does.I just never cared for what became of him in the sequels. He went from a scared nobody into an Arnold Schwarzenegger character.
I couldn't have put it better myself. Die Hard is an American classic, while the sequels were repetetive and recycled, in my opinion.
Originally posted by McLovin
McClane would kick his ass all over the place.I find it ridiculous how they made McClane from scared guy who gets lucky and kills a bunch of terrorists (die hard 1) to the guy that kicks the shit out of anything that moves and kills anyone he wants. (die hard 4)
I'm still cheerin' for Indy.
Oh come on, dude, McClane was a ****ing badass in the first one already.
Only becuase that would have been two many for McClane.
3 WHOLW SOLDIERS....???!!! WOW...!!!! I guess it cant POSSIBLY be as impressive to take out a moving plane and 20 odd fort bragg trained marines WITH A ZIPPO... 😛
I would question Indy's zippo skills against McClane's too.
Genetically he is lighterly-challenged, as evidenced by his dad's shitness with a zippo in IJaTLC, a brief moment of zippoing which burnt Indy a bit and burned down the room that they were in. Not to good.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Only becuase that would have been two many for McClane.3 WHOLW SOLDIERS....???!!! WOW...!!!! I guess it cant POSSIBLY be as impressive to take out a moving plane and 20 odd fort bragg trained marines WITH A ZIPPO... 😛
I would question Indy's zippo skills against McClane's too.
Genetically he is lighterly-challenged, as evidenced by his dad's shitness with a zippo in IJaTLC, a brief moment of zippoing which burnt Indy a bit and burned down the room that they were in. Not to good.
Well of course McClane sets people on fire better, but this thread is h2h combat. You know, that thing that McClane sucks at.