Originally posted by Phantom Zone
After 100 years he would be better because:1. Not the most powerful hero but one of the greatest willpowers in the MU. Im sure there are other aspects that make you a great GL but willpower is the most important aspect. Could Hal do the tings that Frank does without the ring?
2. Even if cyncism affect the power of GL rings he believes its possible to get his family back and this will be a powerul motivating factor.
3. He has lots and lots of time
Ahahahahahahahaha! 😆
Jesus Christ, I can't breathe. That's too ****ing funny.
😆 😆 😆
*wipes tears from face*
Okay. Now that I've caught my breath...
Lemme explain something. Lanterns are chosen from the DCU for their great willpower and ability to resist fear. They're chosen as the elites of their race. Paragons, as it were.
Many of the lanterns of a variety of races are quite long lived. To some of these guys, a hundred years is meaningless. They've been at the lantern game for far longer than that.
Guess what? Even being a paragon of their race for willpower and ability to resist fear. Even with a pure, non-cynical will. Even after being a lantern for far longer than a hundred years....
Hal Highball Jordan is still the best lantern in the corps. He's still numero uno. He's still the best of the best.
For you to assert that Frank Castle, a person that'd be lucky to even get the ring to SPARK, would be able to surpass Hal in a millenia of training is moronic - much less a single century.
Frank won't touch Hal. He wouldn't be worthy to clean the Guardian's shit-holes after a century of ring-slinging.
No contest. 😐.