Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Originally posted by Bardock42
Obviously it is a perfectly fine thing to say his strength is limitless. It is a comic book afterall. But it is weird to connect it to anger so closely. Anger is not really something limitless. You can't get infinitely angry. You know what I mean?
It's a true remark, "The madder he gets, the stronger he gets", but it's not really limited to that, it's not where his strength specifically comes from. At first he could only become The Hulk at night, so his powers have evolved.
The aforementioned remark is more of a warning than a true description of his powers. As Janus said, he's performed outstanding feats when threatened, when stressed, upset, sad, calm. It depends more on his desire to do these things, than the height of which his emotional state is, which does also play a part.
Like in World War Hulk, which I personally liked, it's stated that he's never been as strong as he is then, because he's never been as furious. He wasn't savage, he wasn't in a blind rage, it was an emotional fury that increased his desire to do the most damage possible, and thus access more of his strength. Same with Secret Wars, his desire to save himself, and others, was probably quite high. I doubt he's fond of being killed, so that would explain such instantaneous strength.
It would just be a bit pointless to have to say "The madder he gets, the stronger he gets...*And then everything I've just said.*". It's an old phrase that doesn't totally capture the explanations or powers of the character, just one aspect of it.
Besides that, that's why they think he's so dangerous, because Banner himself knows that if Hulk was truly left untamed and savage, with the kind of power he has, he could likely destroy this planet. So it's never really power on-tap, as Janus said. Banner, over the years, has learned to at the very least, keep Hulk non-savage. So even at his worst, it's a focused rage.
Of course, this is why I don't really like discussing comic book explanations. I think the evolution of The Hulk is really very acceptable considering you have guys like Chris Claremont making Iceman godlike for no reason, but at the end of the day, the more someone tries to explain things that aren't meant to be explained in depth, the more someone anal is going to come along and get all needlessly scientific about it.
You can do that with any character, not just The Hulk, but I just steer clear of doing so. Unless it's something truly ridiculous, like punching through time.
-AC