SpearofDestiny
Perfection
Originally posted by inimalist
isnt your point that a quality of God contains a paradox?
Yes, but that's not the basis of what I am saying.
There can be a logical paradox in nature, or in one's lifetime experience.
I just think in this case, the paradox is illogical. I think the contadiction here is more severe than God knowing the future, but there still being free will.
Originally posted by inimalist
I think a discussion of whether logical paradoxes can exist, whether they exist outside of human language, whether logic exists outside of human conception and how close we can come to knowing those axioms is, pretty much, the only important line of dialog.
Well I will admit that I do think logical paradoxes exist in nature, and in many ways which only a number of people can recognize. So I'm not exactly saying that a logical paradox cannot exist.
Like I stated before, I find this paradox illogical. And I don't think it's just a paradox like the one for omnipotence.
If God is omnipresent, then nothing in existence is separate from him. He would exist in all directions, in all categories of thought, in all atoms, in every possible facet of being, since omni encompasses all, and present encompasses being.
The only logical conclusion would be that non-existence is the only thing separate from God.
If Hell is total separation from God, then it exists...but if it exists, then it is a place/idea/state of mind/state of being that does not include God. If that is so, God is then not omnipresent.
So it's not just a paradox, but a logical impossibility. If you want to say that God is beyond logic, and can break the rules of restrictions of reality, then you can say that. But to me, that's a major cop out, and a conveinent "all answer" to anything having to do with God in the first place.
But, I accept your argument about human logic. All we can work with is what we can conceive of, and if God is beyond human conception, then he or it is not bound by our perceptions.
I am simply stating that this contradiction/paradox is not logical or consistent, and thus causes a problem for general understanding.
Originally posted by inimalist
Every paradox about God is instantly rendered moot if God exists and the paradoxes are merely a product of language.
But language does not dictate nature. Whether or not we recognize a paradox to be so, does not render the paradox existent or non-existent. And this problem is not simply that of language, or even common sense.
It's not like the mysterious black hole, or presence of dark matter, or curvature of space time. Those mysteries still fit with each other, and can be explained logically through study and evidence.
The contradiction of God's omnipresence, yet non existence of Hell can't be logically explained or made sense of.
Originally posted by inimalist
If you aren't interested in talking about the base assumptions you are making, then there is no reason in discussion. You can actually make ANY statement, and have it be true, so long as the underlying assumptions are assumed to be true. The problem here, is that what you are assuming to be true might not be.
What do you imagine I am assuming to be true ?
I don't beleive in Hell or the Biblical God.