Originally posted by h1a8
I can show you multiple times spidey has shown more than class 40 strength. Actually there are a couple of building bracing feats that Spidey has (you alluded to one of them). These feats are clearly class 100 as a building is more than 1000 tons.Even though I love Spidey the best (he's my favorite by far) I cannot give him more than 10 tons strength even though he has plenty of feats exceeding this (I'm talking about classic spider-man). This proves that I am not bias (a fanboy). Logan's strength stats have always been no more than peak human. Where do you get this 4 or 5 nonsense? Do you actually read the handbooks? I think you are starting to lose your mind now.
You are avoiding my question though. In your opinion, how many feats does it take for someone to defy an official handbook stat?
I don't think those are clear class 100 feats, he's not bracing the entire building by himself, he's holding up part of a buildings support structures. If he picked up something of that size completely off the ground without help from other supports it be far less ambiguous as to how much he's actually holding up.
I don't think you're a fanboy, you just have a strange way of looking at things.
Like I said, 4 or 5 is a good start how is that avoiding your question? What good is a handbook stat if it's always proven wrong?
For years even up through the last half decade Wolverine's handbook clearly stated that he couldn't regrow organs. Yet he'd been doing feats of that scale for years upon years.
Handbooks are no more "official" than the comics books that proceed them; the books that they're derived from. A writer writes handbooks as one does a comic. So why would a stat take precedence over what a character proves he or she can do again and again.
You know what else is "official"? The 616 cannon timeline. 😐