Originally posted by darthgoober
You say that Supes is well known for his speed and that's absolutely right, it's well known that he can move REALLY fast. However, Supes is NOT known for his FTL blitzing capacity, as your inability to find a single instance of it amply demonstrates. You're relying on a single, questionable, indirect indication of FTL blitzing capabilities for Supes and then criticizing others for not coming up with more instances of lightspeed reflexes for Thor, which is more than a little hypocritical...
point taken...I agree Thor does have superfast reflexes
ok lets move on to your theory that the heat vision would affect Thor.
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj133/paladin123456/avengers16603vk1.jpg
Originally posted by Master-BorgCap never speedblitzes though.
captain marvel is known for speed...he has the speed of one of the godsand Thanos has super-reflexes
Doomsday in his first appearance was acknowledged by big blue himself to be superfast
OK... 😕
He's not really superfast... he's just got good reflexes.
Originally posted by darthgoober
Thor's lightning/energy blast from the hammer are often omnidirectional due to the way Thor swings it. Just because Supes attacks from the side it doesn't mean that he can't be hit, and while he's shacking off the effects of the magical lighting... Godblast(since we're assuming that they always use their best attacks no matter how often they're used in comics).
That's right. I'm ready to battle.
Originally posted by Larceny
It's like I left and went to work and this place went to hell.However, that's beside the point. I'm astounded at what I've seen in this thread. Why Superman supporters continually ignore the fact that Thor has in fact shown the ability to react to top tier speed is beyond me. I've posted scans, but they've been ignored. I've constructed arguments, but they to fell on deaf ears. He's dodged lasers, dealt with Surfer and Gladiators speed, humiliated Hermes, deflected and or absorbed high speed blast, reacted to the FTL speeds of his hammer, created sonic booms through combat speed, etc. Yet for some odd reason, the one argument their latched to is the one constructed around an assumption? An assumption that when asked to be supported by evidence was then supported by feats that had nothing to do with what was asked to be shown.
This is ludicrous.
Batman dodged lasers. I guess he can react to Superman speeds huh? The problem is dodging lasers requires one to move out of the way after the beam is fired and not before. So neither Thor nor batman dodged lasers.
Thor didn't deal with SS or Gladiator's speed. SS didn't
use his top speed against Thor and Gladiator thrashed Thor when he used his speed.
Phoenix telegraphed the blast when she pointed her hands at Thor. Superman could punch more than once you know.
The hammer slows down when reaching Thor. Thus Thor never reacted to his hammer traveling FTL.
Thor created a sonic boom by striking forcefully and not by being fast.
You are just another Thor con artist. Just look at the way you worded this: "created sonic booms through combat speed". I was on to you cons a long time ago.
Originally posted by Mr. SlippyfistNo. I never disproved it. I just said that since SS did the same thing then it proves that he has good battle speed too.
Wasn't the above scan disproved at him going FTL... even by your own logic before? 😕
😂So... you admit you know nothing about Odin?
Lulz.
The grasping at straws concerning Thor's speed feats here is hilarious.
Originally posted by Juntai
Superman doesn't stand a chance against Thor.
Thor's from Marvel, he'll beat Supes' ass.
Check out how fast he moves in scans from 1970, and again over a decade later in 83, he can deal with Supes' speed.
What's Supes going to do when the hammer hits him?
That's right, he's unconscious.
😂
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
BWHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1I just waded through the last few pages of this thread and I am lul'zing my a$$ off. Current posters who believe Superman can beat Odinforce Thor through speedblitz:
[b]Avlon
Master-Borg
xJlxKing
h1a8
Wrathfuldwarf
TricksterpriestAnd this is pretty much their argument:
"I guess, since Odinforce Thor could never use his magic in time to ward off the dreaded ole speedblitz (even though he's deflected lasers, fought and beat the Silver Surfer, blocked telepathic blasts, is able to swing his hammer at ftl speeds)... then Supes just wins, eh? Oh what fanboy joy to have Superman be so kewl! Wait! We Superfanboys must seize upon this unprecedented support! Quick, before someone realizes how inane this argument is, let's post a Rune King Thor vs Superman thread! Because I mean... Rune King Thor never showed us any ftl reflexes more then classic Thor ever did and never showed us more durability then classic Thor ever had, only increased magic and reality-warping powers... so... then... Superman must beat Rune King Thor through speedblitz also!!!! Squeel!!!! Cause, he could totally like knock him out before Rune King Thor could do anything! Superfanboys unite!"
Wow. Just wow. Get it in your heads you fanboys, Superman vs. Odinforce Thor! Who put the stupid juice in KMC's water supply? Guy222?! Was it you?! You naughty boy! The debate going on now is just fine for classic Thor vs Superman. But current Thor? The equivalent of King Thor? The current Thor who actually has better feats then King Thor did? Wow. Just wow.
And for those who don't appreciate my sarcastic characterization of pro-Superman posters... exactly how different would your arguments be from Rune King Thor and current Thor anyway using your logic? Gimme a break. Darthgoober, don't even bother. This is below you. Someone start up a good ole classic Thor vs. Superman thread.
Current Thor 9/10 curbstomp. [/B]
Is there something mentally wrong with you? With that RIDICULOUS opening statement I didn't even want to read your post. Who's even going to take your "debate" seriously after something like that?
Reported.
Originally posted by NewjakMost of Marvel's character's continuity has changed[unless you want to believe Tony Stark fighting off Vietnamese in the 60's during the war in still Canon.], they just didn't have defining moment WHEN it changed, as DC previously had Crisis on Infinite Earths. In fact, me getting scans of Superman from back then could be equally if not more valid, since DC has actually been referencing those Pre-Crisis comics, especially concerning Superman and Byrne's powerlevel reboot has pretty much been written out.
And you wouldn't use scans of Superman from back in the 70s if they were relevant?
But the point is, representations of a characters that old, are plainly out of date.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0It's against the rules to flame people but it's not smart to flame a mod, especially a global. 😖 I don't want to see this again. Thanks.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1I just waded through the last few pages of this thread and I am lul'zing my a$$ off. Current posters who believe Superman can beat Odinforce Thor through speedblitz:
[b]Avlon
Master-Borg
xJlxKing
h1a8
Wrathfuldwarf
TricksterpriestAnd this is pretty much their argument:
"I guess, since Odinforce Thor could never use his magic in time to ward off the dreaded ole speedblitz (even though he's deflected lasers, fought and beat the Silver Surfer, blocked telepathic blasts, is able to swing his hammer at ftl speeds)... then Supes just wins, eh? Oh what fanboy joy to have Superman be so kewl! Wait! We Superfanboys must seize upon this unprecedented support! Quick, before someone realizes how inane this argument is, let's post a Rune King Thor vs Superman thread! Because I mean... Rune King Thor never showed us any ftl reflexes more then classic Thor ever did and never showed us more durability then classic Thor ever had, only increased magic and reality-warping powers... so... then... Superman must beat Rune King Thor through speedblitz also!!!! Squeel!!!! Cause, he could totally like knock him out before Rune King Thor could do anything! Superfanboys unite!"
Wow. Just wow. Get it in your heads you fanboys, Superman vs. Odinforce Thor! Who put the stupid juice in KMC's water supply? Guy222?! Was it you?! You naughty boy! The debate going on now is just fine for classic Thor vs Superman. But current Thor? The equivalent of King Thor? The current Thor who actually has better feats then King Thor did? Wow. Just wow.
And for those who don't appreciate my sarcastic characterization of pro-Superman posters... exactly how different would your arguments be from Rune King Thor and current Thor anyway using your logic? Gimme a break. Darthgoober, don't even bother. This is below you. Someone start up a good ole classic Thor vs. Superman thread.
Current Thor 9/10 curbstomp. [/B]
