Originally posted by Kris Blazeno, you're wrong.
Wrong on all accounts.Super-ultra-mega wrong.
It would be an attempted, and failed as we saw, speedblitz by Wolverine. A regular human can speedblitz another one. It happens many times in MMA fights and so on.
Wolverine overwhelming someone with all the speed he could muster would be a blitz.
He lacks the speed to attain a speed blitz...
a speed blitz and a blitz are different visually...in a speed blitz, a person becomes a blur. Wolverine can never attain that.
Originally posted by Starscream M
no, you're wrong.Wolverine overwhelming someone with all the speed he could muster would be a blitz.
He lacks the speed to attain a speed blitz...
a speed blitz and a blitz are different visually...in a speed blitz, a person becomes a blur. Wolverine can never attain that.
No.
Originally posted by Starscream M
nice comeback.guess I checkmated you.
Your idea of speedblitz is the direct opposite of practically every poster here who has an opinion on the matter. Basically, the so called "bar" for speedblitzing is being depicted a certain way by an artist and left entirely up to someone's interpretation of speed. Basically, your definition of what a speedblitz is does not fit that of the -entire- forum. It does not say anything about actual speed either, as even Thor (your anti-example) has been depicted as a blur.
Originally posted by Starscream M
by your definition, if aunt may took her handbag and smacked Kingpin with all her speed, and he just sat there taking it, we could say Aunt May is speedblitzing king pin.
By your definition it would be a speedblitz if I threw on 3 straight lines after her handbag.
Originally posted by Starscream MIf Aunt May had any measure of speed or quickness, and overwhelmed KP with it yea. I'm not sure what the comparison between Aunt May and Wolverine is though.
nice comeback.guess I checkmated you.
by your definition, if aunt may took her handbag and smacked Kingpin with all her speed, and he just sat there taking it, we could say Aunt May is speedblitzing king pin.
ridiculous.
Sure, you could say she attempted to speed blitz.
You could go by the definition of the two words 'speed' and 'blitz'.
Originally posted by Kris Blaze1. no. mine point is art is an indication of speed. the representation of people being in a blur indicates an extreme speed.
Okay, I'll give you a more respectful comeback.Your idea of speedblitz is the direct opposite of practically every poster here who has an opinion on the matter. Basically, the so called "bar" for speedblitzing is being depicted a certain way by an artist and left entirely up to someone's interpretation of speed. Basically, your definition of what a speedblitz is does not fit that of the -entire- forum. It does not say anything about actual speed either, as even Thor (your anti-example) has been depicted as a blur.
No, by my definition if would be a speedblitz if she beat the shit out of him before he could react.
By your definition it would be a speedblitz if I threw 3 straight lines on after her handbag.
2. by your definition, speedblitz is completely relative then. If x attack y, who is slower than x, than x is speedblitzing y.
but if x attacks w, who is faster than x, at the same speed x attacked y, he wouldn't be speedblizing w because w could react.
that definition makes no sense to me.
Superman if he flies at near light speed and beats on Hulk would be speedblitzing him.
Superman if he flies at near light speed and tries to beat on flash, but fails because flash can react, should still be considered a speedblitz attack imo, albeit a failed one.
Originally posted by Mindsetso then speedblitz is meaningless as a term...anyone could speedblitz...just find a slower opponent. If I hit a baby before he can respond, Im speedblitzing him...I don't like the definition.
If Aunt May had any measure of speed or quickness, and overwhelmed KP with it yea. I'm not sure what the comparison between Aunt May and Wolverine is though.Sure, you could say she attempted to speed blitz.
You could go by the definition of the two words 'speed' and 'blitz'.
I prefer speedblitz to be a impressive feat, ie.something only extremely fast and manuevrable characters (superman, flash) can pull off.
saying anyone can pull off a speedblitz is going agains tthe spirit of the meaning of speedblitz, even though technically it may be accurate.
Originally posted by the ninjak
Thor has obviously had an upgrade recently. Supes has a weakness to magic on a level that one strike from Thor would hurt like anyone normal person..... Jeez loki would just turn him into a frog ....................................SUPERFROG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Superman is not weak to magic. Certainly not physical attacks by magical beings. He has endured Skyfather level attacks and various other high level magic attacks like nothing when his will was strong.
Since you are new here I guess I will educate you.
Superman is a lot faster than Thor and can pop thor before he can act.
Superman can chain together more hits to form a combo and continue it until Thor is koed.
The combo to ko principle requirements are:
1. Ability to hit hard enough to jarr/stun an opponent.
2. Speed to hit again with another jarring blow before the stun effect wears off from the previous blow.
Since Superman meets those requirements then he wins over Thor everytime. Thor won't ever get a chance to act.
In addition,
Superman can evade and vibrate through any of Thors attacks.
Superman can instant appear behind Thor, above Thor, etc..
Superman can easily knock Thor's hammer away or knock him in the head so hard he drop's it.
Superman can break Thor's neck (he won't though).
Superman can lobotimize Thor with his heat vision (he won't though).
That should bring you up to speed.
Originally posted by Starscream Mmaybe because you don't think sometimes.
so then speedblitz is meaningless as a term...anyone could speedblitz...just find a slower opponent. If I hit a baby before he can respond, Im speedblitzing him...I don't like the definition.
your explanation is pretty phucktarded
Originally posted by Starscream MNo, it's not a meaningless term, that's like saying overpower is a meaningless term, it's all relative.
so then speedblitz is meaningless as a term...anyone could speedblitz...just find a slower opponent. If I hit a baby before he can respond, Im speedblitzing him...I don't like the definition.I prefer speedblitz to be a impressive feat, ie.something only extremely fast and manuevrable characters (superman, flash) can pull off.
saying anyone can pull off a speedblitz is going agains tthe spirit of the meaning of speedblitz, even though technically it may be accurate.
It becomes impressive depending on who it's utilized against, I don't see what is hard to understand about this.
Whether you like the definition or not doesn't matter, you don't make up your own because of this.
Originally posted by Mindsetso can you be speedblitzed by someone slower than you?
No, it's not a meaningless term, that's like saying overpower is a meaningless term, it's all relative.It becomes impressive depending on who it's utilized against, I don't see what is hard to understand about this.
Whether you like the definition or not doesn't matter, you don't make up your own because of this.