Blade vs. Wolverine

Started by Creshosk57 pages

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
specualtion taht what? vampires can smell humans, they prey on them that and the fact hat the man was identified as a familar I guess are all lis
Reading comprehension FTW!

He was obviously a normal human that was being kept as a normal human. Why?

I'm going to turn the table on you and ask you for the motives of the vampires for having NOT eaten him, having NOT turned him into a vampire.

Dazzle me...

Originally posted by Creshosk
So we're back to the Bias arguments that break the forum rules are we?

Awesome. Anything to get Blade a win... No mater how stupid or illogical the lengths, we must get Blade the win he doesn't deserve.


...what breaks forum rules

wolverine most definently didnt heal form his injuries in minutes

and the fact the first fight I identified ives them both preperation means blade has access to the vampire blood

and recent scans pretty much prove wolverines healing factor hasdecreased

Originally posted by Creshosk
Reading comprehension FTW!

He was obviously a normal human that was being kept as a normal human. Why?

I'm going to turn the table on you and ask you for the motives of the vampires for having NOT eaten him, having NOT turned him into a vampire.

Dazzle me...

he was a famiiliar/vampire wanna be -stated in the comic

Originally posted by YFZ 350
Just go find out on your own. I would give you a description but I got you figured out. You'll sit there and nit-pick over nothing that makes any sense.
So when asked for evidence you say go get it yourself? Bad debating.

Originally posted by YFZ 350
I'll give you a hint though. The X-Men that were bitten all were turned normal at the same time.......

BTW I wish I had a scanner.

Oh I get it you CAN'T back up your claims with evidence so we're supposed to blindly accept your arguments as objective truth...

Yeah, that's ... hypocritical if you don't do the same you realize.

Originally posted by Creshosk
So when asked for evidence you say go get it yourself? Bad debating.

Oh I get it you CAN'T back up your claims with evidence so we're supposed to blindly accept your arguments as objective truth...

Yeah, that's ... hypocritical if you don't do the same you realize.

no he's asking you to prove that wolverine has been able to heal from a vampire bite...which you and other have said he was capable of with no proof

Originally posted by Creshosk
So when asked for evidence you say go get it yourself? Bad debating.

Oh I get it you CAN'T back up your claims with evidence so we're supposed to blindly accept your arguments as objective truth...

Yeah, that's ... hypocritical if you don't do the same you realize.

I gave you evidence you just refuse to accept it and besides you already said you read the issue.

You were the one who made the claim Logan fought off the vampire bite in 2 minutes a few pages ago iirc. When we asked proof you start getting mad and stuff.

So back up your claim please. Where was it shown Logan fought off the vampire bite?

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
...what breaks forum rules
It's listed under bias claims which also covers "It's batman he'll find a way" or "It's reed richards he'll find a way."

In this case you're basically saying "Its blade, he kills vampires therefore he wins."

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
wolverine most definently didnt heal form his injuries in minutes
You got proof or are you going to tell me I haven't read the issue because you DON'T and I disagree with your assesment like all I've been getting in this fanboy riddled thread?

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
and the fact the first fight I identified ives them both preperation means blade has access to the vampire blood

and recent scans pretty much prove wolverines healing factor hasdecreased

Recent scans prove nothing of the sort. "I can't promise your healing factor will be as strong" is NOT a statement that it is definetly decreased. Its hater spin, much the same as political pundits do with canidate speeches... I guess we can call you a comic book pundit or talking head... you have just as much credibility with how you're trying despretly to spin this shit.

"Oh he said he can't promise it'll be as strong, that means its weaker for SURE!"

Originally posted by Creshosk

In X-Men Annual #6 yes Wolverine was a Vampire very temporarily. but then he fought off the vampire enzyme.

All I ask if for you to back this claim up.

Originally posted by YFZ 350
I gave you evidence
Telling me I haven't read ths issue is not evidence. Speculation is not evidence. Affirming the consequent is not evidence.

Originally posted by YFZ 350
you just refuse to accept it and besides you already said you read the issue.
And I disagree with your assesment of events. Ergo, you'll need concrete proof that proves that your assesment is what happened.

Originally posted by YFZ 350
You were the one who made the claim Logan fought off the vampire bite in 2 minutes a few pages ago iirc.
You recall incorrectly.

Originally posted by YFZ 350
When we asked proof you start getting mad and stuff.
When asked for proof of cliams I didn't make? Yeah I'll get irritated by illogical strawmanning.

Originally posted by YFZ 350
So back up your claim please. Where was it shown Logan fought off the vampire bite?
He's a vampire now a days huh?

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
no he's asking you to prove that wolverine has been able to heal from a vampire bite...which you and other have said he was capable of with no proof
Is he a vampire now? ❌
Was he OBVIOUSLY returned to normal? ✅

Do you like that fact? ❌
Does that change anything? no2

Originally posted by YFZ 350
All I ask if for you to back this claim up.
My proof is that he's NOT a vampire.

Sorry kid, can't prove a negative... which means the burden of proof is on YOUR shoulders to prove that he's still a vampire.

Originally posted by Creshosk
T

He's a vampire now a days huh?

Is this your final answer?

Originally posted by Creshosk
My proof is that he's NOT a vampire.

Sorry kid, can't prove a negative... which means the burden of proof is on YOUR shoulders to prove that he's still a vampire.

Even in the face of defeat you continue your pursuit. I respect that.

Originally posted by Creshosk
It's listed under bias claims which also covers "It's batman he'll find a way" or "It's reed richards he'll find a way."

In this case you're basically saying "Its blade, he kills vampires therefore he wins."

You got proof or are you going to tell me I haven't read the issue because you DON'T and I disagree with your assesment like all I've been getting in this fanboy riddled thread?

Recent scans prove nothing of the sort. "I can't promise your healing factor will be as strong" is NOT a statement that it is definetly decreased. Its hater spin, much the same as political pundits do with canidate speeches... I guess we can call you a comic book pundit or talking head... you have just as much credibility with how you're trying despretly to spin this shit.

"Oh he said he can't promise it'll be as strong, that means its weaker for SURE!"

No I said blade would be able to turn wolverine to a vampire, therefore his arsenal is then prefectly suited for dealing with wolverine, after that point all he'd really need to was form a crossw ith the narest to objects

and no thats not the only reason I think it's weaker, because recent scans have shown wolverine falling to the ground after being shot in the eye bye scalphunter and through the throat by dead pool

Originally posted by Creshosk
My proof is that he's NOT a vampire.

Sorry kid, can't prove a negative... which means the burden of proof is on YOUR shoulders to prove that he's still a vampire.

he's not sti la vampire, the thing is thoug hhe didnt fight off the vampire enzyme by himself because other members of the x-men were turned and were returned to normal as well despite them not having a healing factor

Originally posted by Creshosk
My proof is that he's NOT a vampire.

Sorry man. But this response clearly dictates you have not read the issue.

Originally posted by YFZ 350
Sorry man. But this response clearly dictates you have not read the issue.
Oh I'm sorry, I guess in your version of the book he's still a vampire. And since Blade kills vampires Blade wins this fight. Cause that's what he does.

🙄

Originally posted by Creshosk
Oh I'm sorry, I guess in your version of the book he's still a vampire. And since Blade kills vampires Blade wins this fight. Cause that's what he does.

🙄

when wolverine is a vampire yes blade does gain an extremely large advantage since vampires do have many weaknesses he can exploit

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
No I said blade would be able to turn wolverine to a vampire, therefore his arsenal is then prefectly suited for dealing with wolverine, after that point all he'd really need to was form a crossw ith the narest to objects
Because ALL anti-vampire arsenel works on ALL vampires. Which means that if Wolverine gets ahold of some of Blade's areenal it'd be useable against Blade, since Blade's a vampire too![/your logic]

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
and no thats not the only reason I think it's weaker, because recent scans have shown wolverine falling to the ground after being shot in the eye bye scalphunter and through the throat by dead pool
I hope that's not the fight where after being shot by sclaphunter Wolverine ducks under the truck to get on top of scalphunter...

Originally posted by DestinyGuy678
when wolverine is a vampire yes blade does gain an extremely large advantage since vampires do have many weaknesses he can exploit
Like blade has all those lovely weaknesses?

You know what I'm probably being unfair expecting you guys to pick up on the socratic irony.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Like blade has all those lovely weaknesses?

You know what I'm probably being unfair expecting you guys to pick up on the socratic irony.


blade isnt a normal vampire that the whole thing about his character, wolverine isnt a daywalker nor would any of his powers grant him protection from those weaknesses