Originally posted by Master-Borg
actually, Im not saying he would be the same at all.
Actually that's exactly what "the other side" is saying that you're defending.
Originally posted by Master-Borg
Im saying there's as little evidence that he would be the same as there is to suggest he would be different...
The evidence he'd be the same is because other people that are different form wolveirne have been the same....
Originally posted by Master-Borg
pretty much there is no evidence. Thus the burden rests equally on either side to make their case.
I'm saying he would NOT be the same. You can't prove a negative.
I mean we could use where he WAS turned into a vampire and was clearly not the same... but that's a "what if" comic and is therefore discarded even though its the "what if" you're asking me to prove and it agrees with what I'm saying...
So really its a surpressed evidence fallacy.
"What if wolverine was turned into a vampire?"
Well we can't use when it DID happen...
So we have to assume a bunch of fallicious information for the Blade side to be right.