Batman vs Gambit

Started by Battlehammer7 pages

Batman vs Gambit

who wins?

standard weapons and militarials for both.

GAMBIT. HE HAS MUTANT AGILITY. AND COULD LITERALLY BLOW UP THE BLOCK AND TAKE BATMAN OUT.

Nice thread, I was thinking about this battle too, but you beat me to it. And you know who I'm going with on this one. I love Gambit, but I don't think he can beat Bats.

lol what a shocker lol.

why does batman win in your opinion?

so tempted to make a (wolverine vs batman thread simply to see your opinion of the fight)

Originally posted by Battlehammer
lol what a shocker lol.

why does batman win in your opinion?

so tempted to make a (wolverine vs batman thread simply to see your opinion of the fight)

If Batman can keep some distance between him and Gambit. And utilize his weapon efficiently and keep Gambit from grabbing and charging him with his powers. I would say that Batman has a good chance. Other then that, I see Batman as the better fighter in my opinion. Batman 7/10

Originally posted by thadarknite84
If Batman can keep some distance between him and Gambit. And utilize his weapon efficiently and keep Gambit from grabbing and charging him with his powers. I would say that Batman has a good chance. Other then that, I see Batman as the better fighter in my opinion. Batman 7/10

BEING A BETTER FIGHTER WON'T SAVE HIM FROM BEING BLOWN UP ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE BLOCK.

batman wins majority

Originally posted by Battlehammer

so tempted to make a (wolverine vs batman thread simply to see your opinion of the fight)

wait, there isn't one already?

Originally posted by thadarknite84
If Batman can keep some distance between him and Gambit. And utilize his weapon efficiently and keep Gambit from grabbing and charging him with his powers. I would say that Batman has a good chance. Other then that, I see Batman as the better fighter in my opinion. Batman 7/10

Keeping distance is exactly how Batman would lose in a fight if both can see each other (ie no subterfuge). Gambit has markedly better weapons at range than Batman. The latter's close range fighting skills will give him a couple of wins, but all Gambit needs to do at close range is to touch Batman. He takes an easy majority.

Gambit has actually done fairly well against people like Daredevil and Wolverine so it's not like Batman is going to own him in hth, add his speed and powers and Batman is going to have to work for his wins.

Originally posted by Ouallada
Keeping distance is exactly how Batman would lose in a fight if both can see each other (ie no subterfuge). Gambit has markedly better weapons at range than Batman. The latter's close range fighting skills will give him a couple of wins, but all Gambit needs to do at close range is to touch Batman. He takes an easy majority.

Are you serious? Batman has the better weapons at far distance, explosive batarangs, smoke bombs, flash bombs etc.

Originally posted by thadarknite84
Are you serious? Batman has the better weapons at far distance, explosive batarangs, smoke bombs, flash bombs etc.

Grabbing a handful of sand, charging said sand, and throwing in the general direction of Batman is already far more dangerous than the culmination of everything you mentioned. Batman has more tricks at distance, but I don't think there should be a debate as to whose tricks are deadlier.

knockout gas Disables Gambit.

Originally posted by Ouallada
Grabbing a handful of sand, charging said sand, and throwing in the general direction of Batman is already far more dangerous than the culmination of everything you mentioned. Batman has more tricks at distance, but I don't think there should be a debate as to whose tricks are deadlier.
charging sand? that would be a pretty bad tactic imo

Originally posted by Starscream M
charging sand? that would be a pretty bad tactic imo

Concrete grains, pebbles, bricks. Anything inorganic is a weapon, and the man has fantastic aim. The point still stands. Knockout gas may not incapacitate Gambit, but getting hit by a charged object, or being in the vicinity of an explosion will probably incapacitate Batman. This is simply a fight which favours Gambit's skillset.

Originally posted by Ouallada
Concrete grains, pebbles, bricks. Anything inorganic is a weapon, and the man has fantastic aim. The point still stands. Knockout gas may not incapacitate Gambit, but getting hit by a charged object, or being in the vicinity of an explosion will probably incapacitate Batman. This is simply a fight which favours Gambit's skillset.

Wrong, Batman has walked away from being near explosions before. In Batman #674 he was hit with a explosive shell in the chest, even though he had a heart attack a little after that. It didn't kill him right away. His suit is really tough and can withstand a lot of damage. And Batman's aim in my opinion is better, he never misses.

http://img36.imageshack.us/my.php?loc=img36&image=scan00042an.jpg

Here, Bruce is hiding in a tree, and an arrow is shot at him without him being aware of it. Then, before the arrow can reach him, he tosses a batarang at it casually, splits it in half, and splits the bow in half as well. This just goes to show how awesome Batman's reflexes/reaction speeds and accuracy are

http://img64.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sreflexesep6.jpg

And Gambit has deflected machine gun fire back at the shooter and dances between bullets.

Originally posted by Silent Master
And Gambit has deflected machine gun fire back at the shooter and dances between bullets.

Batman has batarangs with a boomerang effect. Even if Gambit dodges it, the batarang will return catch him off guard. Batman is more smarter than Gambit when it comes to tactical fighting.

I say Gambit for the majority depending on where the fight takes place, and how many cards he has on him.

Originally posted by thadarknite84
Batman has batarangs with a boomerang effect. Even if Gambit dodges it, the batarang will return catch him off guard. Batman is more smarter than Gambit when it comes to tactical fighting.

Gambit casually dodges thousands of rounds from multiple directions, I think he can handle boomerangs.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/55/120017975_f7df868416_o.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/37/120017974_f89b8486f1_o.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/51/120017973_23b5197ea8_o.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/53/120017972_51c7bfed33_o.jpg