Originally posted by leonheartmm
he wud charge batman's dick and give it a 1 minute timer to explode.ok bruce, you can stay around here and spend your last one minute as a man fighting me, or you can grab batgirl there and spend your last minute ****ing her............ your call buddy.
well gambit wins either way.
...That also would not end well for Batgirl.
Just saying.
Bruce is the superior fighter outta these two in close, so Batman takes H2H 7/10.
And if Batman can counter people's distance attacks when he doesn't even know they are there, he sure as hell can counter Gambit's cards when he's aware of 'em in the arena.
Gambit isn't really all that bright, either. Advantage goes to Batman for this battle.
Originally posted by The HeapYou realize Gambit can directly charge Batman, right?
Bruce is the superior fighter outta these two in close, so Batman takes H2H 7/10.And if Batman can counter people's distance attacks when he doesn't even know they are there, he sure as hell can counter Gambit's cards when he's aware of 'em in the arena.
Gambit isn't really all that bright, either. Advantage goes to Batman for this battle.
Batman is the better h2h fighter, but Gambit wont be using just h2h so it doesn't matter.
Gambit not being bright is only your opinion and isn't backed up by anything shown in the comics...
Well, in terms of physical attributes, Batman generally has Gambit stomped (except for speed. I see them as sort of on par when it comes to speed- not enough for either of them to gain an advantage, anyways). Not only that, he is a far more talented and effective martial artist, who can easily be considered one of the greatest non-enhanced martial artists in comic book history; he knows multiple techniques that can be lethal, too, so if it's a bloodlust battle, he can off Gambit with one blow.
If they close up, that is. I think that in long-ranged combat, Gambit has too big an advantage; granted, Batarangs and ropes are cool, but Gambit has extremely powerful projectiles. Scary. And it looks like it's bad news for Batman in that category; unless he manages to get a smoke bomb in and drop Gambit with something like a non-modified Leopard Blow (that's the name, right?), Gambit simply has too big an advantage.
Overall, I'd say that Gambit takes this fight 7/10 times or so. If they close up, however, Batman can kill him before Gambit can charge him.
Originally posted by Mindset
You realize Gambit can directly charge Batman, right?Batman is the better h2h fighter, but Gambit wont be using just h2h so it doesn't matter.
Gambit not being bright is only your opinion and isn't backed up by anything shown in the comics...
And your stuff is? 🙄
Batman throws 2-3 smoke grenades into Gambits direction as their both circling each other before the fight. Batman, at first would throw one at the ground as a distraction, then would end up behind him using his stealth/ninja training, and would throw the 2nd smoke grenade at Gambit, which Gambit dodges, but Batman throws the 3rd s-grenade into the air itself, to Gambits left [or right, depending on which way he jumps] and as Gambit leaps into mid-air, he accidently gets himself smacked in the face by the 3rd smoke grenade as they connect mid-air, thus blowing Gambits eye sight for awhile. Batman would then use his superior H2H skills/techniques and kick Gambits ass for good.
Try to go through this logic with me LOL.
Originally posted by Master Crimzon
Well, in terms of physical attributes, Batman generally has Gambit stomped (except for speed. I see them as sort of on par when it comes to speed- not enough for either of them to gain an advantage, anyways). Not only that, he is a far more talented and effective martial artist, who can easily be considered one of the greatest non-enhanced martial artists in comic book history; he knows multiple techniques that can be lethal, too, so if it's a bloodlust battle, he can off Gambit with one blow.If they close up, that is. I think that in long-ranged combat, Gambit has too big an advantage; granted, Batarangs and ropes are cool, but Gambit has extremely powerful projectiles. Scary. And it looks like it's bad news for Batman in that category; unless he manages to get a smoke bomb in and drop Gambit with something like a non-modified Leopard Blow (that's the name, right?), Gambit simply has too big an advantage.
Overall, I'd say that Gambit takes this fight 7/10 times or so. If they close up, however, Batman can kill him before Gambit can charge him.
👆
Originally posted by Master Crimzon
Well, in terms of physical attributes, Batman generally has Gambit stomped (except for speed. I see them as sort of on par when it comes to speed- not enough for either of them to gain an advantage, anyways). Not only that, he is a far more talented and effective martial artist, who can easily be considered one of the greatest non-enhanced martial artists in comic book history; he knows multiple techniques that can be lethal, too, so if it's a bloodlust battle, he can off Gambit with one blow.If they close up, that is. I think that in long-ranged combat, Gambit has too big an advantage; granted, Batarangs and ropes are cool, but Gambit has extremely powerful projectiles. Scary. And it looks like it's bad news for Batman in that category; unless he manages to get a smoke bomb in and drop Gambit with something like a non-modified Leopard Blow (that's the name, right?), Gambit simply has too big an advantage.
Overall, I'd say that Gambit takes this fight 7/10 times or so. If they close up, however, Batman can kill him before Gambit can charge him.
I dont personally consider gambit as a street level fighter like I do bruce...isnt his stats peak human on the account of his interkinetic power. He has caught/dodged bullets, stood off agaisnt the top MAs in marvel and held his own so why assume the battle is in bats favor even up close. Gambit can also use his bio-kinetic power to charge any organic or inorganic matter within his line of sight...honestly from afar or up close bats is screwed.
Originally posted by The Heap
And your stuff is? 🙄Batman throws 2-3 smoke grenades into Gambits direction as their both circling each other before the fight. Batman, at first would throw one at the ground as a distraction, then would end up behind him using his stealth/ninja training, and would throw the 2nd smoke grenade at Gambit, which Gambit dodges, but Batman throws the 3rd s-grenade into the air itself, to Gambits left [or right, depending on which way he jumps] and as Gambit leaps into mid-air, he accidently gets himself smacked in the face by the 3rd smoke grenade as they connect mid-air, thus blowing Gambits eye sight for awhile. Batman would then use his superior H2H skills/techniques and kick Gambits ass for good.
Try to go through this logic with me LOL.
With all those throws, why do you assume Gambit wont be throwing any of his MUCH more dangerous projectiles? And Gambit dances in gunfire, whats to assume he wont just bat those smoke 'nades away with his staff? afterall, he has far greater reflexes/agility/speed than the Batman.
I beg to differ Wolverine once took Gambit down within moments when he tried.
Batman is most assuredly Gambits superior physically, and the only thing that Gambit truly has on him is that he can charge items up.
Surely Batman can counter this cheap parlor trick with his gizmos to make this an even fight.
Gambit is not a murderer, when was the last time anyone has seen him charge a hero up because he was afraid to lose a fight? This isn't a point that anyone should attempt to dwell on.... it's really out of character for Remy to use such a tactic.
I've never seen Gambit as being more of a fighter than Nightwing, and Nightwing is outclassed in the fighting skills dept. when it comes to facing off against Batman. Batman is an A list street fighter Gambit is a C list fighter, down there with guys like Bullseye. Bold statement but true.
Batman is stronger, wiser, and has more tricks up his sleeve than Gambit could possibly handle.
Batman ftw
7.5/10
Originally posted by CaptainStoic
I beg to differ Wolverine once took Gambit down within moments when he tried.Batman is most assuredly Gambits superior physically, and the only thing that Gambit truly has on him is that he can charge items up.
Surely Batman can counter this cheap parlor trick with his gizmos to make this an even fight.
Gambit is not a murderer, when was the last time anyone has seen him charge a hero up because he was afraid to lose a fight? This isn't a point that anyone should attempt to dwell on.... it's really out of character for Remy to use such a tactic.
I've never seen Gambit as being more of a fighter than Nightwing, and Nightwing is outclassed in the fighting skills dept. when it comes to facing off against Batman. Batman is an A list street fighter Gambit is a C list fighter, down there with guys like Bullseye. Bold statement but true.
Batman is stronger, wiser, and has more tricks up his sleeve than Gambit could possibly handle.
Batman ftw
7.5/10
mmm, i know opinions can never really be wrong, but...^
Originally posted by The Great Galen
I dont personally consider gambit as a street level fighter like I do bruce...isnt his stats peak human on the account of his interkinetic power. He has caught/dodged bullets, stood off agaisnt the top MAs in marvel and held his own so why assume the battle is in bats favor even up close. Gambit can also use his bio-kinetic power to charge any organic or inorganic matter within his line of sight...honestly from afar or up close bats is screwed.
Which is why I said that Gambit is likely to take this fight; he's a metahuman. Bruce isn't.
In H2H combat, Bruce is as fast and far stronger and more durable than Gambit; one blow is all he needs to kill Gambit. A pressure point strike, for example, and Gambit is dead. He won't even have the chance to charge Batman if they go into H2H with Batman bloodthirsty.