Batman vs Gambit

Started by Mindset7 pages

Originally posted by namorsubby
bat feats>gambit's feats
That has more to with Batman having his own comic and being a major comic character, than him being stronger than Gambit.

so what.......this is comic land we're talking about. considering the reasons outside of actual comics doesn't help.

gambit isn't too impressive and wouldn't even be a big knotch on batman's belt of victories.

Anyway...

Gambit can and probably will win a majority.

why......because he just should????

batman FTW.....cause he gots the credentials.

okay Gambit should win I will agree with you. But Batman's feats and ingenuity are just unbelievable, honestly he schools guys who statistically should mop the floor with him any-day of the week. So although it might seem like gambit takes it. Batman is just a ridiculous hero who can almost do anything (dependent on the writer), so I will give it to Bats.

Bump.

Gambit, 8/10.

Originally posted by shiv
knockout gas Disables Gambit.
I was thinking more of something like a kick to the face.

Batman takes this 5/10, in my opinion.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Batman takes this 5/10, in my opinion.

That's...not really 'taking' it then, considering its a stalemate to you.

Originally posted by Enyalus
That's...not really 'taking' it then, considering its a stalemate to you.
He's saying Batman wins but he's being nice.

Originally posted by snoopdogg
He's saying Batman wins but he's being nice.

Again...5/10 is a split. 😬

gambit ftw 8/10

*shrugs*

Batman takes the match 5/10 is pretty explanatory to me. Of the ten matches he is in, he wins five of them. Leaving the other five to be draws or victories in Gambit's favor.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
*shrugs*

Batman takes the match 5/10 is pretty explanatory to me.


Its pretty explanatory to me, too. If Batman wins five out of the ten matches, then Gambit also wins five of the ten matches. Thus, that's a 5/10 split each way/tossup/stalemate.

Which is cool. 'Cause its your opinion. I was just puzzled why you would say Batman wins when your math says he doesn't.

Batman winning 5/10 makes sense as far as math goes. He wins five of the battles, leaving the other five unaccounted for. Gambit could win those five, he could stalemate the five, or any combination in between.

As far as I'm concerned, when the whole #/10 is used, I figure if the characters have ten matches, than ________ wins # of said ten matches.

In any case, I also see where you're coming from.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Batman winning 5/10 makes sense as far as math goes. He wins five of the battles, leaving the other five unaccounted for. Gambit could win those five, he could stalemate the five, or any combination in between.

As far as I'm concerned, when the whole #/10 is used, I figure if the characters have ten matches, than ________ wins # of said ten matches.

In any case, I also see where you're coming from.

So if Batman wins 5, Gambit ties 2 and wins 3 Batman wins overall?

That's very strange. 😛 The only tie I can possibly think of is a double KO scenario. That's....weird to me. 😛

Originally posted by snoopdogg
So if Batman wins 5, Gambit ties 2 and wins 3 Batman wins overall?

Well, if out of ten matches:

Batman beats Gambit
Batman beats Gambit
Batman beats Gambit
Batman beats Gambit
Batman beats Gambit
Batman draws/ties Gambit
Batman draws/ties Gambit
Gambit beats Batman
Gambit beats Batman
Gambit beats Batman

Then, yes, Batman wins overall, seeing as he has five clear wins over Gambit, and Gambit only has 3 clear wins over Batman. If we use that example.

Gambit.