Originally posted by CreshoskHuh? Thor was obviously more of a threat. Drax didnt know what it was half the time. But I suspect you have read none of these comics.
More of your bad logic.So "they're seperate characters" when the argument is in your favor to say such a thing and "Its a valid comparison" when the fact that you're comparing dissimilar characters is in your favor.
Hypocritical.
Originally posted by quanchi112I have read the comics. That's a classic ad hominem attempt to discredit the opposition.
Huh? Thor was obviously more of a threat. Drax didnt know what it was half the time. But I suspect you have read none of these comics.
What I'm attacking is the fact that you will insist that two characters are different characters but then turn around and compare different characters just ebcause it suits your argument. That's a double standard, its intellectually dishonest.
Originally posted by CreshoskBut your responses make me think you didnt read them.
I have read the comics. That's a classic ad hominem attempt to discredit the opposition.What I'm attacking is the fact that you will insist that two characters are different characters but then turn around and compare different characters just ebcause it suits your argument. That's a double standard, its intellectually dishonest.
I use no double standards. Explain specifically what I said and then how I used a double standard.
Originally posted by Creshosk
I think he put you on ignore. Its not a dodge.. but what's funny is he was right. He doesn't even need to see your posts tyo know they're BS.
Strangely enough the ones dodging the questions, using illogical comparisons, and attempting to hide behind semantics are the ones attempting to point fingers.
Interestingly enough, even with proof of methods of winning on my end, and illogical comparisons on his end...he still maintains the energy to keep going in a circular argument.
The reasons stand very well on their own. 🙂
Henshaw ftw.
Originally posted by quanchi112Naturally you'd say that because I keep calling you on your BS as have others. So to fight back you try to insinuate or even directly state that others have not read the comic, therefor they must be wrong so that you can be right. Even if I hadn't your arguments would STILL be illogical.
But your responses make me think you didnt read them.
Originally posted by quanchi112I've already pointed out your double standard. You attack other peoples comparison of characters saying they're different characters but then around and compare two characters that are even more different.
I use no double standards. Explain specifically what I said and then how I used a double standard.
So you can compare characters, because it supports you, but others cannot compare characters because it undermines you.
That's a double standard.
Originally posted by quanchi112I don't recall seeing KM in this thread... what was that you said to me about leaving people whom are not involved in a debate out of the thread?
He dodged km's questions and dodged one of mine well before he put me on ignore.
Another double standard? You can mention posters that aren't involved in the thread but I can't?
I notice that you like to selectively apply everything. Dictating that others cannot do what you yourself are allowed to do?
Originally posted by AvlonHenshaw doesnt win. You never answered my questions as to who this gun would work on and who it wouldnt.
Strangely enough the ones dodging the questions, using illogical comparisons, and attempting to hide behind semantics are the ones attempting to point fingers.Interestingly enough, even with proof of methods of winning on my end, and illogical comparisons on his end...he still maintains the energy to keep going in a circular argument.
The reasons stand very well on their own. 🙂
Henshaw ftw.
Again I have not seen anything similar to what Thanos did to Thor to suspend him in this block with a scan. Thor for the win.
Originally posted by CreshoskI didnt criticize a poster I just merely pointed out question dodging. I also pointed out he dodged my question before I suggested he put me on ignore because he cant control himself and attacks me when this is just comic book debating and nothing to get upset over.
Naturally you'd say that because I keep calling you on your BS as have others. So to fight back you try to insinuate or even directly state that others have not read the comic, therefor they must be wrong so that you can be right. Even if I hadn't your arguments would STILL be illogical.I've already pointed out your double standard. You attack other peoples comparison of characters saying they're different characters but then around and compare two characters that are even more different.
So you can compare characters, because it supports you, but others cannot compare characters because it undermines you.
That's a double standard. I don't recall seeing KM in this thread... what was that you said to me about leaving people whom are not involved in a debate out of the thread?
Another double standard? You can mention posters that aren't involved in the thread but I can't?
I notice that you like to selectively apply everything. Dictating that others cannot do what you yourself are allowed to do?
Again which comparison did I say was a no go and which compariosn had to with who wins this thread.
Originally posted by quanchi112You told me not to bring up other posters not involved with the thread and then turn around and bring up other posters not involved with the thread in an attempt to bash another poster. Hypocritical much?
I didnt criticize a poster I just merely pointed out question dodging.
Originally posted by quanchi112Then there's no reason for you to get defensive to the point of pointing out "question dodging" or calling other people trolls. You're allowed to get upset but other people aren't allowed to get tired of dealing with your illogical bullshit? Hypocritical much?
I also pointed out he dodged my question before I suggested he put me on ignore because he cant control himself and attacks me when this is just comic book debating and nothing to get upset over.
Originally posted by quanchi112Why? Because you're the one to decide that others comparisons are invlaid when yours breaks rules of logic as multiple posters have pointed out? Again, hypocritical much?
Again which comparison did I say was a no go and which compariosn had to with who wins this thread.
Originally posted by Creshosk
You told me not to bring up other posters not involved with the thread and then turn around and bring up other posters not involved with the thread in an attempt to bash another poster. Hypocritical much?Then there's no reason for you to get defensive to the point of pointing out "question dodging" or calling other people trolls. You're allowed to get upset but other people aren't allowed to get tired of dealing with your illogical bullshit? Hypocritical much?
Why? Because you're the one to decide that others comparisons are invlaid when yours breaks rules of logic as multiple posters have pointed out? Again, hypocritical much?
👆
Strangely enough, he asks for me to ignore him, and yet he responds to posts I can't see...
Logic (and Henshaw) ftw! 🙂
Originally posted by CreshoskAgain what does this have to do with the thread. It seems you keep trying to goad me into losing it while I just come here to debate and I respond respectfully. 😛
You told me not to bring up other posters not involved with the thread and then turn around and bring up other posters not involved with the thread in an attempt to bash another poster. Hypocritical much?Then there's no reason for you to get defensive to the point of pointing out "question dodging" or calling other people trolls. You're allowed to get upset but other people aren't allowed to get tired of dealing with your illogical bullshit? Hypocritical much?
Why? Because you're the one to decide that others comparisons are invlaid when yours breaks rules of logic as multiple posters have pointed out? Again, hypocritical much?
Originally posted by quanchi112Calling other people trolls and telling them they dodge questions and telling them they haven't read the comics in question is not respectful. I know I'm not respectful but I've never made the false claim of being respectful.
Again what does this have to do with the thread. It seems you keep trying to goad me into losing it while I just come here to debate and I respond respectfully. 😛
Originally posted by quanchi112And then when he takes your advice you insult him... Insults and disrespect don't have to come in the form of name calling. Your signature is highly disrespectful.
You insulted so I suggested for your benefit to ignore me.Thor still wins.
Originally posted by CreshoskStay on topic please. i can question whether or not someone has read the comic. I dont insult someones intelligence and what not. I didnt insult him I said he dodges questions which imo he does. That isnt an insult. My sig shows Thanos is higher up than Darkseid on the food chain is all. I think hes more powerful and thats that.
Calling other people trolls and telling them they dodge questions and telling them they haven't read the comics in question is not respectful. I know I'm not respectful but I've never made the false claim of being respectful.And then when he takes your advice you insult him... Insults and disrespect don't have to come in the form of name calling. Your signature is highly disrespectful.
Again lets stay on topic. This is derailing the thread. If you dont like me its fine but I really dont care what you think. Stick to the topic please.
Thor wins.
========================================
Each Gem (even individually)
gives the bearer the potential to wield the infinite concept it represents.
========================================
The reason All 6 Gems makes one God (beneath the LT)
is because then one has complete control over all concepts.
========================================
The Reality Gem is the most to difficult to harness fully, or at all alone.
But on panel we've seen one Gem with absolute control over a Concept on a cosmic scale.
Now, since this is Thor/Power Gem specifically we're talking about,
then we have direct evidence of what he's capable of, and what was his potential,
and how was he stopped. (or contained)
These are the questions, that I will research for myself.
I have never read "Blood & Thunder"
but I have it, the complete saga.
So, I will read, then, I will return later with the info I picked up on Thor/Power Gem,
then I will of course share with yall what I learned of this particular incident,
with scanned Proof 🙂
if there were plot devices or PIS filled stipulations to stop Thor,
was he really becoming unstoppable?
I know I'm gonna find out,
should be an interesting read,
I been wanting to read this arc for a while,
now this half cool, half crazy debate got me motivated.
I'll be back.