Popular Liberal radio host admits to distributing child porn.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/254498

Well that sucks but I think conservative hosts are still way ahead in terms of scandals.

Damn, I wish I saw that broadcast.

Well, at least he is not a hypocrite, like those preachers that suck of phillipino "women".

I knew it! This just proves that all liberals are Satan's footsoldiers!!!1

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I knew it! This just proves that all liberals are Satan's footsoldiers!!!1

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, at least he is not a hypocrite, like those preachers that suck of phillipino "women".

Ha, I guess. He can't be charged with anything? (If it's in the link excuse me, this dial up @ home is sooo slow)

Originally posted by chithappens
Ha, I guess. He can't be charged with anything? (If it's in the link excuse me, this dial up @ home is sooo slow)

never heard of him.

Turns out he's a pedophile, the shit ****. As far as I know though, he wasn't spouting about certain "evils" while secretly engaging in them, like the long list of conservatives Adam has listed, so a hypocrite, he isn't.

also he's not in the business of running the country. if we're going to broaden the scope of scrutiny to talk show personalities then we'll need a whole new thread for rush limbaugh's pill-popping bangkok kiddie ****ing fat ass

so hypocrisy is worse than child porn

good 2 know 👆

The hypocrisy thing worsens cases generally, 'cause the hypocrite uses lying about their position to put off those who would imprison them, which can be help keep them on the streets abusing kids a little longer.

And when you put your trust in a figure who speaks out against nonces, you perhaps even back them and they turn out to be a nonce themselves, its worse as you are likely to be one of the folks suckered in and then you've unwittingly been backing the equivalent of Hitler in your principles..

Which makes folks mad, naturally.

But whether or not this guy was a hypocrite, this guy is still an absolute scum bag.

Originally posted by Schecter
never heard of him.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
The hypocrisy thing worsens cases generally, 'cause the hypocrite uses lying about their position to put off those who would imprison them, which can be help keep them on the streets abusing kids a little longer.

And when you put your trust in a figure who speaks out against nonces, you perhaps even back them and they turn out to be a nonce themselves, its worse as you are likely to be one of the folks suckered in and then you've unwittingly been backing the equivalent of Hitler in your principles..

Which makes folks mad, naturally.

But whether or not this guy was a hypocrite, this guy is still an absolute scum bag.

Originally posted by red g jacks
so hypocrisy is worse than child porn

good 2 know 👆

Way. I don't even see anything wrong with child porn, really.

got linx?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Way. I don't even see anything wrong with child porn, really.

Isn't really an objective wrong. If consent is given, I see no problem.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Isn't really an objective wrong. If consent is given, I see no problem.

A child cannot legally give consent in many places. Nor can one simply assume that a child really knows what is going on.