Originally posted by Schecter
you said that you would like to commit premeditated murder on someone whom has not violated you or anyone close to you. so, dont dodge the statement.
it dosent matter dude. i stick by what i believe in. hell man you know for a fact the justice system is a joke. pedos get the max of 3 years for there shit. if i went and stole a car in chicago id get 10 to 15 for grand theft auto. and if a pedo rapes a kid he gets 3 years wich is a damn joke
Girthy, you're talking to a bunch of silly mother****ers who think little children have the experience and foresight to understand what the ramifications of their actions could be... at least in regards to sex.
The odd thing, if a 4, 7, 9 or 12 year old is old enough to fully understand what sex is; what are the dangers and therefore we should do away with these "unreasonable" sex laws, why don't we do away with charging children as minors, when they commit a crime? If a 10 year old steals a car, send him to prison for 1-2 years, little-****er obviously knew better, right?
Originally posted by Robtard
Girthy, you're talking to a bunch of silly mother****ers who think little children have the experience and foresight to understand what the ramifications of their actions could be... at least in regards to sex.The odd thing, if a 4, 7, 9 or 12 year old is old enough to fully understand what sex is; what are the dangers and therefore we should do away with these "unreasonable" sex laws, why don't we do away with charging children as minors, when they commit a crime? If a 10 year old steals a car, send him to prison for 1-2 years, little-****er obviously knew better, right?
I'd very much prefer an individual basis than just a weird blanket law.
Besides, those laws would include up to 17 year olds in your country. Isn't that a tad idiotic?
Also, the ideas of castration then feeding the molester the balls and raping him with a rusty spike...just doesn't fit the crime. Sorry, but a 10 year old that gets touche on the pee-pee doesn't have to suffer extensive traumata throughout his live...the action itself really doesn't merit it at all.
Originally posted by P23
if a kid who's 10 gets molested they may not know what it was and therefore cant consent on what was what
What if they do know what it is? I think 10 year olds are smarter then we give them credit for. Shit, I knew what sex is and what the possible rammifications of it are when I was 10.
Then again I'm black. So...
Originally posted by Bardock42
Besides, those laws would include up to 17 year olds in your country. Isn't that a tad idiotic?
Agreed. If you're too stupid to know what sex is by the time you're 17, you're probably not going to magically understand when you turn 18.
I think that to be qualified to have sex you should take like... a test or something. Like a drivers license. 😛
Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
What if they do know what it is? I think 10 year olds are smarter then we give them credit for. Shit, I knew what sex is and what the possible rammifications of it are when I was 10.Then again I'm black. So...
just because you knew about sex at 10 dosent mean every 10 year old will. my aunt adopted 3 girls who were being molested by there birth parents. now the youngest one whos turning 17 is really screwed up and i mean badly. the middle sister just had a baby and the oldest sister (18) is nuts also. the 17 year old my aunt adopted is so bizzare to where she will think someone is trying to hurt her and she once tried burning my aunts house down. right now my aunt is at court with her trying to give her to the state. now the girl acvts they way she does after her biological parents molested her. alot of kids or adults recover but alot of others dont
Fair point. People are different. But I think there's a difference between being forced to doing something, like being molested, and agreeing to do something but not legally agreeing to something.
And I think murder is worse then rape. There are cases when rape victims recover from the expeirence. Dead people don't ever recover from being dead.
Originally posted by P23
just because you knew about sex at 10 dosent mean every 10 year old will. my aunt adopted 3 girls who were being molested by there birth parents. now the youngest one whos turning 17 is really screwed up and i mean badly. the middle sister just had a baby and the oldest sister (18) is nuts also. the 17 year old my aunt adopted is so bizzare to where she will think someone is trying to hurt her and she once tried burning my aunts house down. right now my aunt is at court with her trying to give her to the state. now the girl acvts they way she does after her biological parents molested her. alot of kids or adults recover but alot of others dont
Originally posted by Bardock42
I'd very much prefer an individual basis than just a weird blanket law.Besides, those laws would include up to 17 year olds in your country. Isn't that a tad idiotic?
Also, the ideas of castration then feeding the molester the balls and raping him with a rusty spike...just doesn't fit the crime. Sorry, but a 10 year old that gets touche on the pee-pee doesn't have to suffer extensive traumata throughout his live...the action itself really doesn't merit it at all.
And how exactly do you judge that, considering it's fairly simple for an adult to convince a child that they whated it?
When you get into the upper teens, yes, the laws tend to be a bit extreme. The Euros have it a bit more reasonable with the 16 year old consent thing.
Though some people would like that to happen, castration (chemical being an exception), self-cannibalization and rusty spike analrape isn't in the law. Doesn't correct, but some do.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Some sort of evolutionary urge to protect children...I assume.
Then we forgive the earlier poster for feeling that way.
Can't ostracize folks for being human.
Sure, Im sure we've all said we'd love to go out and kill someone at some point for some reason or another, and true what Schect says, It'd be perhaps wrong to go out murdering people that haven't done that thing to me directly, but I won't be losing any sleep if a proven nonce should be revenged upon by the families of the victims neither.
Millions of years of evolution and genetics are hard to override at the best of times, let alone when it comes to something as base-level as that.
Originally posted by Robtard
And how exactly do you judge that, considering it's fairly simple for an adult to convince a child that they whated it?When you get into the upper teens, yes, the laws tend to be a bit extreme. The Euros have it a bit more reasonable with the 16 year old consent thing.
Though some people would like that to happen, castration (chemical being an exception), self-cannibalization and rusty spike analrape isn't in the law. Doesn't correct, but some do.
It's hard to judge, I admit that. But that's exactly the reason why it is ridiculous how people flip out when someone mentions child porn or molestation of children. It's in no way related to the crime. Everytime something like that happens you have a judge amount of people that would just love to torture that person (ANOTHER HUMAN BEING). Torture being factually much, much worse than being touched in the vagina.
Same with Rape. It is made much worse and seen as much worse by society. But really. Like Doug Stanhope says, if I got the shit beaten out of me at the moment and the guy would stop and give me the option of getting ****ed in the ass or getting the shit beaten out of me much more...I'd ****ing know what I choose. The victimization that happens is the real problem. The act itself is often less worse than assault...
Originally posted by Robtard
And how exactly do you judge that, considering it's fairly simple for an adult to convince a child that they whated it?
If you replace 'child' with 'person' (even if we included animals) it could work. Being over 18 doesn't make you less of an idiot. We all know adults who do dumb shit all of the time because they were "convinced."
I see your point but just as you can't make mental assumptions across the board for adults, you can't do it for children.
Personally, I don't give a **** if the child understood. Often times, that is a moot point because they are still trying to convince a child to have sex with them ( I think there is an issue with people who can't get some sex from someone their own age; not including 65 and above here... 😆 ), but it is a case by case basis.