Originally posted by Bardock42
Nor can one just assume a child doesn't.
To me that seems to be a much greater leap. Especially considering that child porn is usually prepubescent so the odds of actually understanding sexuality of any sort or level would have to be limited.
Originally posted by Bardock42
But obviously however the laws may be, it doesn't mean they are right or reasonable.
I didn't say they were.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
To me that seems to be a much greater leap. Especially considering that child porn is usually prepubescent so the odds of actually understanding sexuality of any sort or level would have to be limited.I didn't say they were.
Oh, I agree that it is likely for children under 10 to not have any concept of the idea. That doesn't make childporn wrong, that makes raping children wrong.
Originally posted by Schecter
are you a law student by any chance?anyway, while i dislike pedophiles, i think potential first degree murderers should be kept under closer watch.
dude theres a diffrence between killing someone for nothing and killing some one for the right reasons. are you gona say that if some guy trys picking up your younger sibling you wouldnt shoot the s.o.b?
Originally posted by P23
dude theres a diffrence between killing someone for nothing and killing some one for the right reasons. are you gona say that if some guy trys picking up your younger sibling you wouldnt shoot the s.o.b?
you said that you would like to commit premeditated murder on someone whom has not violated you or anyone close to you. so, dont dodge the statement.