Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
I am not familiar with sadophilia. Explain mortal.
Leon will mess it up so I'll explain. It's a paraphillia in which you involve this man:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f7/Yasutora_sado.jpg
Originally posted by leonheartmm
and AGAIN you can not substantiate your claim by posting EVIDENCE. i.e. points which make the parallel between the toaster and the gay marriage with content. i did provide points for my parallel between torture and porn. since points exist for mine and not for your parallel, therefore, the two can no be equated as one has been validated {by specific overlapping points} while the other has been invalidated by the lack of any overlapping points of content which can be seen as significant to the situation. now please, end this useless rant, its no good for either of us to go in circles.
That's the whole ****ing point of the analogy, you imbecile, there is no correlation, parallels or overlapping points. Women/men getting paid on camera to **** does not translate to any of the moronic extremes you've have to go to to try and make your case.
The very fact that you've progressively gone from one extreme to another to make a point shows how pathetic and illogical your stance is.
Originally posted by leonheartmm
ahh but you forget, nearly ALL porn stars in porn related interview{just like penthouse girls} would act super slutty and horny and say they love dick to please their audience and increase sales and perhaps , give the impression that they really ARE into the thing and not just faking. i dont think that can be used as positive evidence at all, furthermore, whod wanna see a pornstar whose already admitted to faking it and doing it for the money?who are you exploiting this time, vertebrates of invertebrates{that thing with the octopus still cracks me up}
No, their word on why THEY decided to go into porn is about the only thing that we can use to judge why THEY decided to go into porn. So yes, it can be used and is obviously evidence when talking about the reason why they made their choice.
Originally posted by leonheartmm
yeah, im gonna rely on my buddy group to give me solace and a false sense of victory when i cudnt do anything of substance in the actual debate. DAMN STRAIGHT CHIT! 😆
Nice, so you relate everyone else disagreeing with you for basically the same reasons, i.e. your complete lack of logic as 'buddy groups all against you because you happen to be correct'. You poor tortured soul.
Originally posted by Robtard
That's the whole ****ing point of the analogy, you imbecile, there is no correlation, parallels or overlapping points. Women/men getting paid on camera to **** does not translate to any of the moronic extremes you've have to go to to try and make your case.The very fact that you've progressively gone from one extreme to another to make a point shows how pathetic and illogical your stance is.
but you are lying, i have already given the points for my parallel. which validates it. you on the other hand havent given overlapping points for your parallel, which invalidates it. hence the two can not be compared, nor can my parallel claimed to be false.
Originally posted by leonheartmm
but you are lying, i have already given the points for my parallel. which validates it. you on the other hand havent given overlapping points for your parallel, which invalidates it. hence the two can not be compared, nor can my parallel claimed to be false.
Your points were illogical and illfounded.
Originally posted by BackFire
No, their word on why THEY decided to go into porn is about the only thing that we can use to judge why THEY decided to go into porn. So yes, it can be used and is obviously evidence when talking about the reason why they made their choice.
the words of ex pornstars and ex video hoes pokes serious holes in that argument. plus the uniformity of perspectives on interview for porn shoots also raises doubts about the autheticity of the claimed reasons of pornstars, so no, i dont agree.
Originally posted by Robtard
Your points were illogical and illfounded.
and yet, you say it but cant point out the specific illogical aspects in each point, infact you never tried. that coupled with the fact that you have as yet been unable to come up with points validating your own parallel makes me think that you do not really uderstand what parallels ae and have no real argument. cheers.
Of course there are ex pornstars who act as if they were victimized because they made a choice they now regret. That doesn't mean it's widespread or wholly representative of the industry as a whole. There are also plenty of ex pornstars who still say they did it because they love sex and don't regret it.
Either way, the choice was theirs, and they're ultimately responsible for it. Unless we're talking about illegal slavery here, in which case that's a problem with slavery and not porn.
the conclusion you drew of it not being widespread or representative of the industry is an oppinion isnt it. also as concern to your interpretation of choice, i dont subscribe to the same definiton as youd know. some of it is obviously happening in that way, it isnt a 100% exploitive industry, but still, i dont agree that every1 or even the majority has a free choice to make in going in the industry.
Originally posted by leonheartmm
the conclusion you drew of it not being widespread or representative of the industry is an oppinion isnt it. also as concern to your interpretation of choice, i dont subscribe to the same definiton as youd know. some of it is obviously happening in that way, it isnt a 100% exploitive industry, but still, i dont agree that every1 or even the majority has a free choice to make in going in the industry.
Originally posted by leonheartmm
^but that is your oppinion on the subject.
Originally posted by BackFire
lol?
