Originally posted by xmarksthespot👆 it's both because thats what makes up a victory agains some of therse enemies. for example:
It doesn't seem to me like the thread frames the question of how they fare in terms of an arena style battle.If it's asking that then the scenario favors Spider-Man as he and his gallery of rogues are more reliant on brute strength, while Batman and his villains are generally more cerebral planners. Batman is physically outclassed in most cases, while Spider-Man physically outclasses most, but not all of Batman's rogues.
If it's instead asking who would fare better in general dealing with the other's enemies then the scenario favors whomever is more adaptable and/or intellectual in their approach to their enmity. In which case, while Spider-Man is intelligent and adaptable, Batman is more so. And villains like the Joker or Ra's could very well destroy Spider-Man far worse than simply killing him. Never go for the kill, when you can go for the hurt.
for spider-man to beat bane, he is not only going to go through some mind games and misdirection, but also a head to head fight if they meet.
in batman's case, if he was going against the green goblin, he waould have to counter the goblin's clear mobility advantage and save innocents from his destructive exploits while most likely saving hosteges on top of that. and he too might have to go toe to toe with him.
fighting the hydro-man isn't ever really that cerebral, but it almost always is a test of the inginuity of the hero.