Originally posted by Strangelove
It's all pointless anyway. Ratings for video games and movies are advisory only, I don't think they're binding at all.
AO is binding, which is where the great diverge happens. Games have much lowered criteria. In a game, if a topless image is shown it is automatically given an AO rating, which dooms the game. If there's a full sex scene in a movie, they still only get a R rating. Gambling and drugs are more strictly enforced in games also, but that comes down to more where you live.
Originally posted by Devil King
There is a difference between "stricter" and "more controlled". As it is, there is less money invested in video games and the investor's bottom line than is the rate for movies. From what I've seen from my roomates video game choices there is far more gotten away with in video games than there is in movies, considering the self-imposed regulations that control the movie industry; movies produced by an industry that underwrites the very rating system that dictates it's own rating and standards. I don't know much about video games, other than what I see in the infrequent moments I actually stay on the couch long enough to see what happens in the opening moments. But I highy doubt there is as engrained a system for video games as there is for movies. In either case, I would rather there be no rating system for either. As I have long belevd;it isn't what you hear, it's how loudly you hear it. That has little to do with the parents and everything to do with the child. Violent video games are nothing but a scapegoat. As are violent movies.
Video games have the same setup for rating as movie, except with modified requirements for each level.