Jack Bauer VS John McClane

Started by ragesRemorse10 pages

Jack Bauer VS John McClane

A terroristic virus causes a nation wide blackout in the United States. For some reason or another, CTU expects McClane to be the prime suspect. Bauer's objective is to find and kill McClane under any means necessary. In the middle of a traffic jam, Bauer spots McClane and opens fire. Under fire McClane disappears into a sea of people. He believes Bauer is merely another terrorist trying to kill him.

Bauer has no resources from CTU or backup manpower. It is nothing but Jack pursuing McClane in the midst of an overpopulated, distraught city.

Who wins?

Mclane.

His exploits are on an action hero level, and his ability to kick ass is much more exaggerated than Bauer. 24 is more realistic, therefore Jack would lose.

Did I make sense there?

Originally posted by Quincy
Mclane.

His exploits are on an action hero level, and his ability to kick ass is much more exaggerated than Bauer. 24 is more realistic, therefore Jack would lose.

Did I make sense there?

👆 ✅

No, Jack Bauer is much more skilled than McClane. I mean he's just a policeman.

Jack Bauer boasts (apart from generally badass) being an ex-Delta Force member. Now before we say McClane (policeman) wins, lets do a little research on what level the Delta Force branch functions at.

Originally posted by Placidity
No, Jack Bauer is much more skilled than McClane. I mean he's just a policeman.

Jack Bauer boasts (apart from generally badass) being an ex-Delta Force member. Now before we say McClane (policeman) wins, lets do a little research on what level the Delta Force branch functions at.

Is it the kick-ass-alone-against-a-bunch-of-super-terrorists-thrice-and-then-once-more level?

^ Not sure what that means 😖

Originally posted by Placidity
^ Not sure what that means 😖

Yeah.

Originally posted by Placidity
No, Jack Bauer is much more skilled than McClane. I mean he's just a policeman.

Jack Bauer boasts (apart from generally badass) being an ex-Delta Force member. Now before we say McClane (policeman) wins, lets do a little research on what level the Delta Force branch functions at.

kicking the shit outta Zee Germans.

Originally posted by Placidity
No, Jack Bauer is much more skilled than McClane. I mean he's just a policeman.

Jack Bauer boasts (apart from generally badass) being an ex-Delta Force member. Now before we say McClane (policeman) wins, lets do a little research on what level the Delta Force branch functions at.

That means nothing. 😬

Rank doesn't mean a whole lot..

I think McClane is definitely more of a natural badass. I think it has taken Bauer many years of his life to break the threshold of badassness, but i do think, Bauer is definitely more experienced in tracking people and in assuming his opponents strategies. McClane, does have the split second reaction time as well, but his seems to be more instinctual than cerebral.

I envision, McClane trying to draw Bauer to him. maybe, blatantly leaving a trail through the city, hoping to lead Bauer into a trap. Whether or not McClane would be strategical enough to predict Bauer's actions. He would have the advantage of being pursued.

Am I a terrorist for never having seen a single episode of 24?

No, me neither.

Are you an active participant of this thread?

Originally posted by Devil King
Am I a terrorist for never having seen a single episode of 24?

No, just a kommunist.

Originally posted by Devil King
Are you an active participant of this thread?
Yup. 😄

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yup. 😄

But, how can one do so under the self-admitted ignorance of one half of the very debate in which you have decided to participate? I can't assume you don't have an answer, since you were so upfront about your lack of actual knowledge regarding the subjects of the discussion.

I never saw the 2nd Matrix movie. This is why I never participated in a discussion I knew nothing about, for sure.

Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
No, just a kommunist.

Hillary '08!

Originally posted by Devil King
But, how can one do so under the self-admitted ignorance of one half of the very debate in which you have decided to participate? I can't assume you don't have an answer, since you were so upfront about your lack of actual knowledge regarding the subjects of the discussion.

I never saw the 2nd Matrix movie. This is why I never participated in a discussion I knew nothing about, for sure.

I know a bit about the character, even though I have never seen a full episode. I have seen bits and pieces, which is more than I can say for you. Are YOU an active participant of this thread?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I know a bit about the character, even though I have never seen a full episode. I have seen bits and pieces, which is more than I can say for you. Are YOU an active participant of this thread?

No, I'm not an active participant in this thread. I'm a passive participant inthis thread. I have already admitted to not seeing even the opening credits of this program. This is why I don't pressume to participate in it.

Originally posted by Devil King
No, I'm not an active participant in this thread. I'm a passive participant inthis thread. I have already admitted to not seeing even the opening credits of this program. This is why I don't pressume to participate in it.
And what are you doing now?