Delph's League of Champions Season One Discussion Thread

Started by Galan007198 pages

Originally posted by Scoobless
How about we have the judges PM their decisions to Ill to post all at the same time? that way they can't influence each other with their summary of the matches.
i like it. 👆

Ok, that's 8 of the 11 judges, so it's official. Thanks ya'll

Judge voting will be conducted via PM. Votes will be due Sunday mornings by 11a (PST). Matches end on Thursdays at Midnight (12am on Friday technically) so that will give you a little over 2 full days to come to a decision and PM it to me for posting.

Participants, don't forget that the weekly trade/waiver deadline will be Wednesdays at 3:00pm [PST]. All trades/free agent signings must be submitted to myself or one of the other judges by that time and will take effect on Friday for use in battles the following week. You can always cancel a trade prior to the deadline. Waived characters will be available for drafting on Saturdays on a first come/first served basis. If you need a more detailed explanation of this process just ask and I will provide an example.

Originally posted by Raoul
i don't get it...
What's there to get?

Anyway, yes, I can judge. But probably only an earlier match...

Bit late at this point, but I like the PM decision plan as well.

Regarding characters whose only qualification for being within the caps is a specific mindset or mental block, (IE: Gambit, Jubilee, Dr Light before his brain was fixed, etc), what's our official stance?

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Bit late at this point, but I like the PM decision plan as well.

Regarding characters whose only qualification for being within the caps is a specific mindset or mental block, (IE: Gambit, Jubilee, Dr Light before his brain was fixed, etc), what's our official stance?

Hmm, well, that comes into the issue with drafting "versions" of a character. If you drafted pre-lobotomy Dr. Light or Gambit they'd probably be disqualified. Jubilee on the other hand is a matter of feats attributed to her versus feats attributed to others using her powers. I guess as judges we'll just have to treat it on a case by case basis. I trust the collective knowledge of the participants and judges to come to the right decision when we cross those roads.

Meh... it's pointless to ban such characters. The only way you could make a basis for that sort of thing is to make a case that, without CIS, they'd be in a higher tier for cost... but most characters holding back due to CIS means they have little to no experience using their powers in whatever fashion that they have "mentally blocked".

Seems like it should be viable. I don't know how many people bought Blair's "Over 9000!!!" Jubilee in that one tourney anyway. The potential reward is there, but the risk is equally as great and likely greater. Onus of proof is usually on the plan, not its debunker, and incontrovertible proof can be hard to come by in such instances.

Question. Is anyone opposed to a round or two of 'no-prep' ? Just to make it more even. I personally think we need at least one round of no-prep to keep things interesting.

that's actually a . . . good idea?? from trick?? 😑

who's logged in under trick's name?!

that would mean no amalgamations obviously though, but meh. that WOULD be interesting . . .

...leo, I think he's presuming the amalgamations but just not giving any further time for prep. The entire format would need to be reworked if we didn't have the amalgamations.

Well you could just say prep is limited to amalgamating only, other than that everyone is in stasis waiting for the match.

or you could simply go out on a limb and have the no-prep match be a straight up, non-amalgamation match. THAT would be novel . . .

...it would change too much. Imagine having to draft for both formats. Characters who have 1-2 powers that compliment more well-rounded characters in an amalgamation would suddenly become useless, or close to it. Thus, the people with the best amalgamation-teams might not make it to a phase of the tournament where they can shine. Slight variations in matches are ok, but large ones generally get the 👇 from me.

Against leo's idea. No prep matches are fine if others agree (though the current 10 minutes isn't much, considering amalgamation time) but the fight format needs to stay the same, imo.

hmm, with the possible numbers of characters that are drafted and the time penalty for drafting the amalgamations will be important enough, but BOTH teams would be dealing with the same restrictions and each would simply have to use their individual characters as best they could.

meh, i like the idea of one rd no prep, no amalgamations. i don't think it really changes anything at all, certainly it wouldn't change how i'd draft, not on the basis of just one match that everyone would have to go through. but, as always, i bow to the wisdom of the masses. 🙂

Originally posted by DigiMark007
...it would change too much. Imagine having to draft for both formats. Characters who have 1-2 powers that compliment more well-rounded characters in an amalgamation would suddenly become useless, or close to it. Thus, the people with the best amalgamation-teams might not make it to a phase of the tournament where they can shine. Slight variations in matches are ok, but large ones generally get the 👇 from me.

Against leo's idea. No prep matches are fine if others agree (though the current 10 minutes isn't much, considering amalgamation time) but the fight format needs to stay the same, imo.

Actually, I like it. Could be something of a bonus round in the League. If it's only a one off thing for each team then everyone will still be focused on the overall amalgam inclusive league.

Adds a little more variety.

Just 1 match might not sink things, but I still don't like it. Seems like a science experiment in the middle of a track meet.

Maybe if there's one of those "get back into the tourney FFA" style matches. Then I'd be ok with it.

I hate FFAs, they are just a complete jumble. team A attacks team B, team B attacks team C, team C attacks team A .... of course if any of those posts are read it'll show how the posts by the other teams wouldn't work.

Hmm...

I guess implementing Trick/Leo's idea is up for vote. I personally don't really have a stance on it either way. I don't think having one match where you can't amalgamate your characters would hurt, but I also can't really see the purpose of doing it either.

there is no real 'purpose'. be different is all. be fun looking at an opponent's roster and trying to decide who they'll use and how and who you should use against them. hell, i'm not even sure if this is what trick was getting at. this was just how i interpreted it . . .

Ok, as far as competing goes, i'm out...

sorry, Ill, its not a slight on you personally, i'm just not as interested in tournies where prep seems to be the primary focus rather than the matches themselves...

if i draft colossus, i want to debate colossus, that character, i don't want to have to debate some amalgam, but i'd have to, as its the only way to compete properly...

i've admitted before that prep is not my strong point... my strong point is adaptation during battles (more cyclops than batman, etc), but that doesnt seem to be considered as much, even if its worthy, because prep becomes the be all and end all in a lot of cases...

No offence Ill, and i wish you all well...