Originally posted by chillmeistergenWell in that case Swagger is outclassed. Anything else to add besides sarcasm?
Right, so if there was a movie with a man in it who could shoot people by willing the bullets to go towards them, from thousands of miles away, Swagger would still be better, is that what you're saying? As this is about fictional characters from movies, I assume that's exactly what you're saying.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
My dear lord.....Scene 3, he is sighting in on the can of stew, lowers his binoculars, then he makes the adjustments to his scope manually. I am watching it right now. He made the adjustments by HAND. You can actually see the crosshairs lowering as he makes the adjustments, BY HAND. THEN he tells his dog "1760's a mile, think the president oughta worry?"
Glover also tells Swagger earlier in the movie that his longest shots were never confirmed, so how far Swagger can shoot is obviously farther than a mile.
yes...the scope is adjusted manually...but the calculations are done by the LRRS on that rifle...you cant argue to the contrary cause the facts about the rifle prove you wrong....he uses that rifle to make that shot....so the facts pertaining to that rifle should be brought into the equation
you obviously never bothered to watch the video i linked to...despite demanding links earlier on...you see the guy making the adjustments to the rifle by hand on that too.
there's no point in trying to argue otherwise...that's the way the rifle works
his 1 mile shot is technically unconfirmed...unless you ask his dog if he made the shot
in real life a sniper made a confirmed kill at 50% further distance with an inferior rifle to swaggers
in hitman...47 makes a 250% increased distance kill with an inferior rifle
so swagger wouldn't even be the best in this world...never mind film fiction land
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Okay, but that's all we've got to go on, so that's all we can go on. Unless of course you've somehow met both fictional characters down at the shooting range. Jesus, you really are a cretin of epic proportions.
With that attitude of yours, you really have the gall to attack WrathfulDwarf for banning you?
I'm not gonna give you strike one, two, or three. Quit. Your. Mouth.
Any more, and I'll warn you and let the senior mods know of your crap.
Or am I being "biased" again?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This is for everyone, friend or not:
I'm done being Mr. Lenient.
Any more insults or bashing, from anyone, and it's a warning. I've given you guys more than enough leeway, but you still wanna persist.
Try me now. I dare anyone to accuse me of being biased.
Well, no as at the bottom of your post you did seem to be warning everyone.
God knows why you brought up a separate event, if I didn't know better I'd say it was baiting.
But anyway, I don't want to get into an argument over this. I insulted RJ, yeah, and I'm sure he did the proper thing by bashing the report button enough to hurt his finger, but I feel that he has baited throughout this thread and my reaction was only to be expected.
Originally posted by Ahsoka Tano
This thread has seem to wore it's self out.I really do believe just by the movie not the game that a sniper that can shoot at a 4km distance will have the advantage.
8/10 imo
There are some threads that are worn out before they were even a synaptic misfiring in their creators mind.
Originally posted by Impediment
To hell with the report button. I read the thread with my own eyes.Is it too much to ask that we all remain like civil mined adults and not act like goddamned juveniles?
Really, guys. We're all out of high school, I think. Let's please act so.
Sure, well, there are more juvenile things than simple (possibly accurate) name calling.
Impediment,
Yeah, you are being biased. RJ has been playing the baiting clown for 15-20 pages now, he deliberately uses every dishonest method of debate, yet he doesn't get a warning of any kind. But when someone calls him on his methods and happens to add the word "cretin" (which he certainly is, there's pages of proof in this thread alone), there's an epic problem?
I call bullshit. Being a dishonest baiting jackass as a method to win a debate is FAR worse than being an insulter. I'd rather someone be on the level with me in a debate, yet drop insults here and there over to what RJ does.
Originally posted by Impediment
To hell with the report button. I read the thread with my own eyes.Is it too much to ask that we all remain like civil mined adults and not act like goddamned juveniles?
Really, guys. We're all out of high school, I think. Let's please act so.
calling for people to remain civil minded while in the same sentence calling everyone goddamned juveniles (or at least acting as)....well that smacks of hypocrisy to me
i can understand that perhaps you wrote your last couple of posts while being riled up by what is in the thread...but surely looking back on it with a level head you can see it for yourself.
Originally posted by Robtard
RJ has been playing the baiting clown for 15-20 pages now, he deliberately uses every dishonest method of debate, yet he doesn't get a warning of any kind. But when someone calls him on his methods and happens to add the word "cretin" (which he certainly is, there's pages of proof in this thread alone)
I agree with this part of your post, we are told he's been warned over PM, yet barely see anything public, I think I saw RJ get warned once when he said that awful, rude comment to Placidity.