Off Topic Circle Jerk

Started by Silent Master1,317 pages

Unless I missed it, the tazer in question was never stated to be more powerful than normal, therefore he died from a small amount of electricity.

Again, proof of the voltage? It killed a man whose withstood Chinese electric torture, so obviously it's more powerful. It didn't need to be directly stated to be true. It was physically proven.

Again, Unless I missed it, the tazer in question was never stated to be more powerful than normal, therefore he died from a small amount of electricity.

That produces a small of electricity?

Here's a better view (clearly the same model) used by CTU TAC (essentially FBI HRT)

Again, that is an "old lady" tazer that only produces a small amount of electricity?

I'm glad that you've decided to drop the "it was a superpowered tazer" argument.

I'm glad that you've decided to drop the "small amount of electricity" argument.

It is only a small amount, normal electrical outlets provide far more amps and watts than a taser.

Jack died from a rather small amount. deal with it.

LOL. Now you're trying to say that tasers aren't fatal period, and are not capable of flatlining someone, especially if it is held directly on their heart for 7 seconds. The gaps in logic you are trying to pass off are so massive you could sail an aircraft carrier clean through it 😆

And WTF is your argument anyway? What do electrical outlets have to do with anything? You are trying to strawman and say that just because tazers don't have the power of electrical outlets, they aren't fatal period, which is one of the most bullshit and pathetic strawman arguments I have ever seen.

What are you ranting about now?

Thanks for your concession. 🙂

Was that rant of yours supposed to make sense? I mean we have already established that a normal taser is powerful enough to kill Jack...so you claiming that I said tasers aren't fatal is rather retarded.

So what's your point then? That it's a small amount of electricity? So the phuck what? It's a clearly fatal amount to any human being. And why are you ignoring that he later in life took 20 months of YouTube video, which is clearly more than any taser, not only surviving but not saying a single word out of sheer willpower, even when drugged.

Again, what's your point?

My point is that a normal taser killed Jack, haven't you been paying attention?

That's not a normal tazer. Federal tactical teams don't use bought-off-the-internet tazers.

I get that you want to pretend that the taser was some highly classified piece of military equipment, that is no doubt capable of matching Thor's lightning in terms of power......but it's just a taser.

ya know these last several pages are hilariously funny regarding Jack Bauer.. good thing I am eating cheese popcorn

Originally posted by Silent Master
I get that you want to pretend that the taser was some highly classified piece of military equipment, that is no doubt capable of matching Thor's lightning in terms of power......but it's just a taser.

And?

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
ya know these last several pages are hilariously funny regarding Jack Bauer.. good thing I am eating cheese popcorn

The downplay is hilarious indeed

Originally posted by Lestov16
And?

Jack was killed by a normal taser, deal with it.

OK. It was held on his heart for 7 seconds, so of course it killed him. Are you trying to say that a tazer wouldn't kill someone if it was held directly on their heart for 7 seconds?

I'm saying that he was killed by a normal taser.