Originally posted by Lestov16
So now names can't be shared? Every John Smith on the planet is one guy, according to your logic 😆 . Wow. You're really scraping the bottom of the barrel here with your arguments. Sad, man. Just sad.
Considering there's usually copy-write on product names, it's more likely than your claim of there being two Thunder XL stun-guns sharing names, one looking like a cheap lady-taser but being some super-taser and another that's weak and is sold by a company that sells cheap lady-tasers.
But please, go on and prove they're different and that the one in 24 is super powered, despite it looking like some cheap stun-gun 🙂
That's not an SK Thunder brand tazer, as it lacks the embedded thunderbolt logo. If you can prove that it is SK brand (which, of course, we both know you can't), then I'll concede to you. But you won't. You'll ask me to produce an actual picture, which we both know doesn't exist, rather than use simple logic and reason, which I guess you just aren't capable of. Are you going to keep repeating your failed arguments? Or will you end your butthurt tirades?
Originally posted by Lestov16
That's not an SK Thunder brand tazer, as it lacks the embedded thunderbolt logo. If you can prove that it is SK brand (which, of course, we both know you can't), then I'll concede to you. But you won't. You'll ask me to produce an actual picture, which we both know doesn't exist, rather than use simple logic and reason, which I guess you just aren't capable of. Are you going to keep repeating your failed arguments? Or will you end you butthurt tirades?
Prove that the SK Thunder XL has a embedded thunderbolt logo.
Originally posted by Robtard
Considering there's usually copy-write on product names, it's more likely than your claim of there being two Thunder XL stun-guns sharing names, one looking like a cheap lady-taser but being some super-taser and another that's weak and is sold by a company that sells cheap lady-tasers.But please, go on and prove they're different and that the one in 24 is super powered, despite it looking like some cheap stun-gun 🙂
LOL. You already FUBARed your own argument when you posted the picture of that other Thunder XL with the orange logo, which is neither the one from 24 or SK brand. So there's obviously not a copyright on the name. And I've already shown the one in 24 isn't the SK or orange-labelled one you tried to pass off.
Keep dancing, monkey boi.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Nice try, but once again..here is a pic of the SK Thunder XL
Prove it is the SK Thunder XL. Since there isn't a picture of the actual SK Thunder, we will just have to use reasoning, and more evidence points to it not being the SK, so again, your argument is failing
And failing horribly.
Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL. You already FUBARed your own argument when you posted the picture of that other Thunder XL with the orange logo, which is neither the one from 24 or SK brand. So there's obviously not a copyright on the name. And I've already shown the one in 24 isn't the SK or orange-labelled one you tried to pass off.Keep dancing, monkey boi.
Incorrect. Turns out google mislead me in my search of "Thunder XL SK8000", it's a different brand of taser, that one was a "Security Plus", hence a different logo. Though it does share similar looks with the Thunder XL seen in 24.
But please, go on and prove that the Thunder XL seen in 24 is different than the Thunder XL listed on that S. Korean website 🙂
The proof is that it lacks the Thunderbolt label which is on all SK Thunder brand series. And Robtard proved that there is more than one "Thunder XL", and it's not a copyrighted name. So it's not SK just because they have a taser of the same name.
Please provide proof that the thunderbolt, which is on every SK Thunder series stun gun is not on the SK Thunder XL, or end your nonsense.
Originally posted by Robtard
Incorrect. Turns out google mislead me in my search of "Thunder XL SK8000", it's a different brand of taser, that one was a "Security Plus", hence a different logo. Though it does share similar looks with the Thunder XL seen in 24.
So you admit the name is not copyrighted and it could be used for a fictional device, as it's already been used for multiple unrelated tasers. Thanks 🙂
Originally posted by Robtard
But please, go on and prove that the Thunder XL seen in 24 is different than the Thunder XL listed on that Korean website 🙂
Because all the visible tasers on that website have thunderbolt logos and the name embedded on it, because that's what SK does, and the one in 24 clearly lacks a thunderbolt on either side, and nothing suggests it is SK brand.
But please, go on and prove that the Thunder XL seen in 24 is a part of the SK Thunder brand, even though it lacks the distinctive thunderbolt and embedded name like all the tasers listed on that Korean website, and nothing whatsoever suggests it is related to that company. Take your time 🙂
Originally posted by Lestov16
So you admit the name is not copyrighted and it could be used for a fictional device, as it's already been used for multiple unrelated tasers. Thanks 🙂The proof is that it lacks the Thunderbolt label which is on all SK Thunder brand series. And Robtard proved that there is more than one "Thunder XL", and it's not a copyrighted name. So it's not SK just because they have a taser of the same name.
Please provide proof that the thunderbolt, which is on [b]every SK Thunder series stun gun
is not on the SK Thunder XL, or end your nonsense. [/B]
No, I in fact said it's likely that the "Thunder XL" name is a copy write; why we have two similar looking tasers, but with different names. "Thunder XL" and "Security Plus".
Are you insane? You're the one that first said the taser seen in 24 was a "Thunder XL", and you're correct, even though the name is fuzzy as it's out of focus, it says "Thunder XL".
Two things we know for sure: The name "Thunder XL" is seen in 24 and searching for Thunder XL nets you to a Thunder XL stung-gun that's rated at 100,000 volts. This is what Bauer died from.
IF you want to claim they're not one and the same and that the Thunder XL seen in 24 is super, it's up to you to prove it, considering the shown facts 🙂
Originally posted by Lestov16
The proof is that it lacks the Thunderbolt label which is on all SK Thunder brand series. And Robtard proved that there is more than one "Thunder XL", and it's not a copyrighted name. So it's not SK just because they have a taser of the same name.Please provide proof that the thunderbolt, which is on [b]every SK Thunder series stun gun
is not on the SK Thunder XL, or end your nonsense. [/B]
You keep saying that, but you haven't proven that the SK Thunder XL has sed logo.