Clone Wars- where next?

Started by MIŠT20 pages

Haha, well it's Lucas, so we'll probably get individual series on dvd first, then series 1+2 and series 3+4 boxed sets, then all of them box set, then 'super editions with extra features and 10mins extra footage' individual dvds, then each episode gets its own dvd, then some 'uber extra hour, commentary, wear 3D glasses to get the full effect autographed by all the voice actors edition' box set.

Then he'll do it again for blu ray.

then laser disc lmao

And then a special edition including the movie on VHS. To draw in the OT lovers.

lmao. Classic.

If only the Clone Wars could have been written as a three-act trilogy of films instead of this overkill.....it does seem GL likes this era over the Ot or any other era in the Saga.

I do too. It IS the best.

I have not seen why it is so great yet.

Because of the breadth and intesnsity of the issues examined agoainst the backdrop of a cohesive war.

Much better than the GOOD BAD [/durh] of the 2-year-old OT.

Nonsense, there's no breadth or intensity in this series. If you wanna see that in a tv show, watch Lost. Clone Wars has very little of that.

No no no.

The Clone Wars ERA has the breadth and intensity I was referring to (in ref to Prydon's comment about GL liking this era best).

The Series....well yeah, Its captured about 5-10% of that.

ie. Not a good start.

I don't think it is meant to, honestly.

Me neither. Sometimes I think you want more out of SW than there is, Ordo.

I agree.

💃

Originally posted by queeq
Me neither. Sometimes I think you want more out of SW than there is, Ordo.

Sometimes I think you take everythign at face value and never open up the cover.

If tehre is a lot of extra to find there, I will sure open the cover. The particluar fun thing about SW is that there isn't much there. Other movies and novels suffice for the more layered and indepth stuff. Not SW. It would make it pretentious.

Yeah, because having value is "pretentious."

All I can say is it sucks that you've never really uncovered any true value in Star Wars. Regardless, you can refrain from criticising me for analyzing a film, simply because you don't care to do so.

Oh, I'll analyse it. I've been a SW fan since 1977, I've gone over these movies many many times. And for me, part of the fun, is it's simplicity. SW movies are not like those of Fellini, Kurosawa, Lynch, Roeg or the Coens. If you cannot accept that, then you want more out of them than there's in it or than there was meant to be.

Simplicity is an interpretation, not a state of being.

You're welcome to interpret the movies simply, but one interpretation is not all. It doesn't mean you're right, or any more right than I am, despite any unbased insistance to the contrary.

Lucas calls them simple good vs. bad movies. Simple not in the sense of stupid, but in the sense of not complex.