Originally posted by dadudemon
Just as irrelevant as my pwning your "source" on the UN bill?
LOL WUT?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Or is it just irrelevant because McCain is 90% Bush and it doesn't help your case?
If McCain = Bush
then Obama = Reverend Wright.
Oh wait, Bush was in office for 8 years..Obama listened and agreed with Wright for 25.
Originally posted by KidRock
LOL WUT?
Posting a "funny" image does not change the fact that a "layman" proved, inexorably, that your source was extremely flawed in its math. I would give them a couple of billion, even 10 billion, MAYBE 20 billion, but over 700 billion? Come on.
Originally posted by KidRock
If McCain = Bush
No, McCain = 90% Bush.
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/is_it_true_john_mccain_voted_with.html
Originally posted by KidRock
then Obama = Reverend Wright.Oh wait, Bush was in office for 8 years..Obama listened and agreed with Wright for 25.
Logical fallacy. Thanks for trying, though.
Now, when you stop being another ignorant republican and approach this objectively, it's possible we may agree on things.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Posting a "funny" image does not change the fact that a "layman" proved, inexorably, that your source was extremely flawed in its math. I would give them a couple of billion, even 10 billion, MAYBE 20 billion, but over 700 billion? Come on.
Irregardless, any amount of BILLIONS of dollars being sent overseas to the corrupt UN is proof enough of how little in touch Obama is with reality. Front page of Yahoo news is Wall Street in Crisis..could billions of dollars help out Wall Street and the millions of Americans that own stock? Sure it can..but Obama apparently cares more about people in another country before he does his own.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Logical fallacy. Thanks for trying, though.
Really? So you're telling me Obama sat in Wrights church for 25 years shaking his head "Nope, this is all wrong, I don't agree with any of this"?
Originally posted by KidRock
Irregardless, any amount of BILLIONS of dollars being sent overseas to the corrupt UN is proof enough of how little in touch Obama is with reality. Front page of Yahoo news is Wall Street in Crisis..could billions of dollars help out Wall Street and the millions of Americans that own stock? Sure it can..but Obama apparently cares more about people in another country before he does his own.
By your logic, McSame is the...same, except 10 times worse. When I say 10 times, I'm talking about a factor of ten or more because of "foreign wars".
You do realize that you just proved yourself wrong again, don't you?
Edit-Just to help you out: Well over 1 trillion versus 93 billion. Like I said, by your logic, Obama is the better choice for you, thilly. Obama is just the lesser of two evils, dude.
Also, "irregardless" is the lamest word one could possibly use in a "debate". The moment someone uses the word "irregardless" is the moment they are trying to "sound" right. "Regardless" works just fine.
Originally posted by KidRock
Really? So you're telling me Obama sat in Wrights church for 25 years shaking his head "Nope, this is all wrong, I don't agree with any of this"?
The momet Wright becomes the President of the United States of America, your point will hold credence. I am a fully active member of a church strongly despises abortion, thinks homosexuality is an abomination, and thinks anything that harms the body (within reason) should not be "explored", so if or when I run for president, I'll automatically be anti-abortion, anti-homosexual, anti-drugs, right?
Originally posted by dadudemon
By your logic, McSame is the...same, except 10 times worse. When I say 10 times, I'm talking about a factor of ten or more because of "foreign wars"
Are you one of the fools that believes "omg McCain will keep us in Iraq for 100 years!!!"? Or do you believe McCain will start more wars? Almost like Obama saying "We will attack inside Pakistan if we have to" or we military action against Iran isnt off the table.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Also, "irregardless" is the lamest word one could possibly use in a "debate". The moment someone uses the word "irregardless" is the moment they are trying to "sound" right. "Regardless" works just fine.
Need a tissue?
Originally posted by dadudemon
The momet Wright becomes the President of the United States of America, your point will hold credence. I am a fully active member of a church strongly despises abortion, thinks homosexuality is an abomination, and thinks anything that harms the body (within reason) should not be "explored", so if or when I run for president, I'll automatically be anti-abortion, anti-homosexual, anti-drugs, right?
Abortion, drugs and gay rights are all important political issues..the hatred and racism towards whites isnt. Obama sitting in that church and listening to him preach hate and racism for 25 years says something about Obamas character. It is as if I sat at a KKK meeting for 25 years then said "I don't hate black people, I love them, I don't agree with that the KKK said".
Originally posted by dadudemon
Also, "irregardless" is the lamest word one could possibly use in a "debate". The moment someone uses the word "irregardless" is the moment they are trying to "sound" right. "Regardless" works just fine.
Unirregardless of that, one can make way too big a deal out of things.
Originally posted by KidRock
Are you one of the fools that believes "omg McCain will keep us in Iraq for 100 years!!!"? Or do you believe McCain will start more wars? Almost like Obama saying "We will attack inside Pakistan if we have to" or we military action against Iran isnt off the table.
Are you one of those fools that thinks McCain is going to "tone down" our foreign affairs meddling and get rid of the "petty wars" that billion of tax dollars are spent on?
Given the campaign rhetoric and proposed "foreign policies" of each candidate, who do YOU think is more likely to spend money on "war"?
Originally posted by KidRock
Need a tissue?
No, I need you to get an education.
[/B][/QUOTE] Abortion, drugs and gay rights are all important political issues..the hatred and racism towards whites isnt. Obama sitting in that church and listening to him preach hate and racism for 25 years says something about Obamas character. It is as if I sat at a KKK meeting for 25 years then said "I don't hate black people, I love them, I don't agree with that the KKK said". [/B][/QUOTE]
So, Rev. Wright, at every sermon for 25 years preached against white people?
Wait wait...
Black people in general NEVER talk about the injustices from "whitey".
And Mr. Wright's primary messages were NEVER about "Jesus", "repentence", etc.
Also, has Obama propose any Anti-White policies? Has he spewed any anti-white ideals?
Again, the moment Wright becomes President, your logic will have credence. Will you address McCain siding with his President 90 to 95% of the time? (Which is actually relevant.)
Also, why don't you list the reasons you are voting for McCain. I can and have listed small reasons why I don't like either major candidate.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Are you one of those fools that thinks McCain is going to "tone down" our foreign affairs meddling and get rid of the "petty wars" that billion of tax dollars are spent on?Given the campaign rhetoric and proposed "foreign policies" of each candidate, who do YOU think is more likely to spend money on "war"?
Probley McCain..since Obama wants to reduce our nuclear arsenal, cut funding to missile defense shields and cut funding to future military technologies..I feel so much safer. But overall I feel Obamas billions of dollars worth of social programs will cost more then another war..which may never come.
Originally posted by dadudemon
So, Rev. Wright, at every sermon for 25 years preached against white people?Also, has Obama propose any Anti-White policies? Has he spewed any anti-white ideals?
Noooo not at all, he just randomly started rambling on about "the rich white man and the chickens coming home to roost" one day. It was just a coincidence that all of this anti-white propoganda started up at the exact same time people started looking into his church and baracks background. Just bad timing right?
And if you have seen videos of Wright you will see him go on and on about "the poor black man, the rich white man".
Hmm..Obama wants to tax the rich a lot more and double capital dividends taxes..who does this affect the most? What demo graph of people mostly make up 'the rich'? Is it black people? No, it's white people. Obama wants to cut taxes (as if they pay any already) for the poor and give them all these social programs funded by..the rich. Which demographic represents the majority of poor, inner city people? Would it happen to be blacks and minorities?
I have seen plenty of people argue "The justice system is racist!" since cocaine, mostly used by rich white people, is given a lesser punishment then crack use, mostly used by minorities. Same deal as above then.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Again, the moment Wright becomes President, your logic will have credence. Will you address McCain siding with his President 90 to 95% of the time? (Which is actually relevant.)
So Wright has no influence on Obama just because he wasnt president?
Originally posted by KidRock
Probley McCain..since Obama wants to reduce our nuclear arsenal, cut funding to missile defense shields and cut funding to future military technologies..I feel so much safer. But overall I feel Obamas billions of dollars worth of social programs will cost more then another war..which may never come.
That's wrong, very wrong. No social program costs $600 billion dollars after 7 years, does it?
Originally posted by KidRock
Noooo not at all, he just randomly started rambling on about "the rich white man and the chickens coming home to roost" one day. It was just a coincidence that all of this anti-white propoganda started up at the exact same time people started looking into his church and baracks background. Just bad timing right?
Great, Obama is black. Now that we got that out of the way...
Originally posted by KidRock
And if you have seen videos of Wright you will see him go on and on about "the poor black man, the rich white man".
Yes, I have. Have you seen some of the sermons of ANY evangelist?
Originally posted by KidRock
Hmm..Obama wants to tax the rich a lot more and double capital dividends taxes..who does this affect the most? What demo graph of people mostly make up 'the rich'? Is it black people? No, it's white people. Obama wants to cut taxes (as if they pay any already) for the poor and give them all these social programs funded by..the rich. Which demographic represents the majority of poor, inner city people? Would it happen to be blacks and minorities?
Basically, you don't like democratic policy and now you have an excuse to pin anti-white to it. Am I right?
In other words, you can't claim it's Obama being anti-white, you can only go as far as to say he's simply a democrat, which a majority of democratic politicians are WHITE.
Originally posted by KidRock
"The justice system is racist!"
Major "duh!".
Originally posted by KidRock
So Wright has no influence on Obama just because he wasnt president?
But, that is not the point being debated. You may think it's valid, but it isn't. IF Wright were president and Obama sided with Wright's policies 90-95% of the time, you'd have a point.
Care to address the McCain side of that coin? There's a reason he's called "McSame".
No, I don't like anti-white sentiment. I also don't like ignorant/blind republicans and democrats.
Originally posted by KidRock
So Wright has no influence on Obama just because he wasnt president?
It doesn't seem so. All one has to do is simply listen to Obama speak himself to see that he and Wright have nothing in common. Their styles are different, their language is different. Obama has never ever said anything remotely similar to the vile things Wright has said.
Originally posted by BackFire
It doesn't seem so. All one has to do is simply listen to Obama speak himself to see that he and Wright have nothing in common. Their styles are different, their language is different. Obama has never ever said anything remotely similar to the vile things Wright has said.
It's a ploy. You wait and see. Once Obama is in office, he'll immediately turn into a Black Panther.
That's obviously much easier to believe than McCain having a majority of policies similar to Bush's.
Originally posted by dadudemon
"irregardless" is the lamest word one could possibly use in a "debate". The moment someone uses the word "irregardless" is the moment they are trying to "sound" right. "Regardless" works just fine.
"irregardless" is one of the funniest words in the english language.
for shame