Sarah Palin??

Started by Adam_PoE51 pages
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
How does what her child has done make her a hypocrite? Answer: it does not.

Her being two months pregnant when she eloped makes her a hypocrite.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
How does what her child has done make her a hypocrite? Answer: it does not.
If she herself had sex before marriage that woul make her a hypocrite.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Her being two months pregnant when she eloped makes her a hypocrite.

edit

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
How does what her child has done make her a hypocrite? Answer: it does not.

Didn't we already cover this yesterday. I said I found her having a pregnant unwed teen daughter to be humorous, not hypocritical.

On the other hand, as AdamPOE & Bardock42 pointed out, it seems Palin was indeed spreading her legs before marriage, which is both funny and hypocritical.

Originally posted by Robtard
Didn't we already cover this yesterday. I said I found her having a pregnant unwed teen daughter to be humorous, not hypocritical.

On the other hand, as AdamPOE & Bardock42 pointed out, it seems she was indeed spreading her legs before marriage herself, which is both funny and hypocritical.

I have not heard any of that, and that could be hypocritical.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I have not heard any of that, and that could be hypocritical.

Apparently she was 2-3 months pregnant when she said "I do" to that moose trapper.

Originally posted by Robtard
Apparently she was 2-3 months pregnant when she said "I do" to that moose trapper.

And apparently her daughter is the one who gave birth to her handicapped child. Now we know that was a lie, so how do you know that this story is not also a lie?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
And apparently her daughter is the one who gave birth to her handicapped child. Now we know that was a lie, so how do you know that this story is not also a lie?

It might be wrong. It seems pretty sure that she was less than 8 months pregnant ( at least less than 8 months, if we can assume that her husband impregnated her the second the minister said "...kiss the bride"😉. There's a pretty good chance they ****ed before they got married.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
And apparently her daughter is the one who gave birth to her handicapped child. Now we know that was a lie, so how do you know that this story is not also a lie?

I don't for certain, but there are records of when she was married and she she gave birth. So unless her first child was born several months premature (records of that should exist too), she was taking in cock(s) before marriage.

Originally posted by Bardock42
If she herself had sex before marriage that woul make her a hypocrite.

All Christians are hypocrites. They all believe in those rules but no one can follow all of them. So I find that argument stupid.

Originally posted by Robtard
I don't for certain, but there are records of when she was married and she she gave birth. So unless her first child was born several months premature (records of that should exist too), she was taking in cock(s) before marriage.

People also change their beliefs as they get older.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
People also change their beliefs as they get older.

Yeah I practiced abstinence for 23 years...then I quit, lol. But I will say I never tried to enforce it on anyone else though

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
People also change their beliefs as they get older.

People are also hypocrites.

Originally posted by Robtard
People are also hypocrites.

Are you admitting to something? 😄

Originally posted by Robtard
I don't for certain, but there are records of when she was married and she she gave birth. So unless her first child was born several months premature (records of that should exist too), she was taking in cock(s) before marriage.

She and her husband eloped in secret, and she gave birth to her first child nearly seven months into the marriage.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
She and her husband eloped in secret, and she gave birth to her first child nearly seven months into the marriage.

And were did you get this information?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
And were did you get this information?

The information, the dates specifically, are a matter of public record.

From realclearpolitics.com:

Liberals have long lamented the existence of two nations in America. They are right to do so today, but in a way they never meant. It is not the divide between rich and poor which soon will be causing serious pain on the left. Sarah Palin's pending nomination for Vice President is exposing the depth of the cultural divide between Middle America and the leftists who have taken over the education, media, and cultural establishment of our country.

The announcement of Palin's selection by Senator McCain last Saturday reportedly triggered outright laughter in newsrooms across the land, a nearly unanimous opinion that she would be a disaster for McCain. To the sort of people who believe themselves sophisticated citizens of the world and feel a sense of pride at saving the planet by purchasing carbon offsets, a woman who has borne five children is incomprehensible. Add in moose-hunting, a champion snowmobiler husband and a pregnant 17 year old daughter, and the phrases "white trash" and "trailer trash" are deployed.

A desperate race is underway, with the liberal media scampering to define Sarah Palin to the public as a dangerous religious fanatic and naïve hick, some kind of back woods primitive incapable of effectively discharging the awesome job of president, soon to be thrust upon her as John McCain expires right after his inauguration. Tonight, Governor Palin will have her opportunity to speak directly to the American people, and thanks to the blizzard of critical coverage, she will be no doubt attract an enormous audience.

She has the rarest of qualities: authenticity. Media and Beltway types can't fathom what that is. It goes right over their heads. Not even on the radar screen. Her multiple facets -- beauty queen, moose hunter, mother, member of an Assembly of God Church, and ferocious reformer of corrupt politics may baffle sophisticates, but ordinary Americans see all the pieces fitting together, and they recognize a type of person they know and love.

Think of Marge Gunderson, the fictional chief of police of Brainerd, Minnesota in the Oscar®-winning movie Fargo, taken as a comic send-up by the swells in New York and Hollywood, with her Midwestern twang (shared by Sarah Palin), funny hat, and kitsch-artist husband. The kind of woman who probably rides snowmobiles with her husband, for crying out loud. Yet in the end, Marge Gunderson solved the murder despite the sneers of her betters in the Big City (Minneapolis), and won the hearts of movie audiences. Americans like their heroines full of common sense and spunk.

Sarah Palin is the ultimate All-American Girl, beautiful but not glamorous, powerful but unpretentious, high-powered but down-to-earth, a reformer who speaks up while others cower in fear of rocking the boat. Like Ronald Reagan, she can reach right through the television camera into people's minds and hearts. We recognize one of us.

The left, so wrapped in artifice and fakery, are driven crazy by this. Her behavior appears bizarre, inexplicable. In their minds, she is a disaster and they pretend to be gleeful, asking when McCain will dump her. All while panicking, because they can see the energized GOP base and the failure of Barack Obama to garner the ten-to-fifteen point post-convention bounce to be expected after his speech before the multimillion-dollar Greek temple set and fireworks at Invesco Field only 5 days ago. Those who planned the classical Greek theatrical stage never for second contemplated the possibility of a deus ex machina named Sarah.

So now they hurl ridiculous, self-discrediting accusations (the fantasy that Palin was not the mother of her baby Trig and was covering for her daughter was published by The Atlantic) and cannot understand that they won't work on a mom who's about to become a grandma while caring for a Down syndrome baby. They regard the public as fools to be manipulated, and know that with the MSM megaphone, they can sell practically anything. They turned Ken Starr from a vigorous prosecutor into a sex-obsessed fanatic, didn't they? The Chicago Annenberg Challenge remains unknown to the vast majority of voters.

Sarah Palin, a woman who took down the corrupt politicians dominating her state, may be a tougher nut to crack. She simply doesn't know her place, at least as others have constructed it. She does what's right and tells people what's on her mind. When you believe in the founding principles of the land and see yourself answerable to God, it reinforces an already steely will. If you happen to be gifted with brains, beauty, energy, health, and the charisma of a star, you might just pull off genuine reform.

Republicans are thrilled by what they see in Sarah Palin. Reform Republicanism with a younger generation in charge could knock the left out of power for a generation. The genius Bobby Jindal, out to reform Louisiana as Palin reformed Alaska, awaits the 2012 VP nomination with Sarah at the top of the ticket, if McCain wins this election. Suddenly the Republicans have a claim on being the vote for change.

Despite having been written off as a hopeless cause by political insiders and media know-it-alls, the Grand Old Party is about to renew itself amidst catcalls from the opposition. The same sort of swells who laugh at Sarah Palin as trailer trash categorized Ronald Reagan as an amiable dunce when in a charitable mood, spelled his name Ray-Gun, and felt ashamed to have a graduate of Eureka College, not some Ivy League campus, representing America on the world stage.

Ronald Reagan never let the contempt of the cultural, literary and journalistic elites bother him. He simply spoke over their heads directly to the American people. And changed the world. In Sarah Palin, we may well have a figure able to do the same. All eyes will be on her tonight.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/sarah_palin_and_the_two_americ.html

👆

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
The information, the dates specifically, are a matter of public record.

And still I see no source. You know there are a lot of people who are spreading lies, how do you know that someone has not lied to you?

Originally posted by sithsaber408
a woman who has borne five children

I've seen/heard this touted by the Right to the point of vomiting. I get it, she's a mother, guess what, she isn't the only one.

And far as this nomination being a disaster for McCain's bid, it's a bit early to say it is or isn't.