Thanos vs Onslaught (Xavier/Magneto/Franklin/Nate)

Originally posted by King Kandy
I have no scans. Check it out yourself.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
How do you know this? This is where proof comes in.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
Now prove that she is at par or stronger then Onslaught.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
Your claim, your responsibility to provide scans.

However, Badabing in this thread said that issue numbers and arc titles are valid forms of evidence, so I have mod backing on this one.

Originally posted by King Kandy
The chair is a form of transportation! I mean, this is like saying Spiderman cannot conduct any of his feats in a car once outside of it.

No it's not since the car is not subject to the save ravages of this type of travel.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
Your claim, your responsibility to provide scans.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I dont have to. Who did Onslaught beat that is on Thanos' par or stronger?

Yes you do. Its up to you to prove that without help he can resist a power on par with Onslaught as far as TP.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
No it's not since the car is not subject to the save ravages of this type of travel.

Originally posted by King Kandy
I can't give you scans of something that, to my knowledge, has never been scanned.

However, Badabing in this thread said that issue numbers and arc titles are valid forms of evidence, so I have mod backing on this one.

Well until I can see it with my own eyes, I have no proof it's real. If you want me to believe it then find scans, if you don't care if I believe it then don't bother.

Originally posted by King Kandy
So. You have to prove that the chair contributes to durability, as I have seen no evidence of this.

No I don't, because it's never been shown that he can survive it without the chair.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
Well until I can see it with my own eyes, I have no proof it's real. If you want me to believe it then find scans, if you don't care if I believe it then don't bother.

Originally posted by King Kandy
You can argue until you're blue in the face that I haven't provided evidence but according to KMC standards I have provided perfectly valid evidence.

Thats fine, as I said , it only really matters if you want me to believe it.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
No I don't, because it's never been shown that he can survive it without the chair.

Originally posted by King Kandy
Of course he hasn't, the chair is his only means of getting there. However, the chair does not contribute to his durability

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
Thats fine, as I said , it only really matters if you want me to believe it.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
You have to prove this.

Originally posted by King Kandy
It is ridiculous how you cling to mod backing in one page and then the moment that their standards start to disprove your case you say it doesn't matter. I have provided my evidence, and now the burden of proof is on you again.

You have provided a source I cannot as of yet substantiate.

Originally posted by King Kandy
No, I don't have to prove it does not contribute to his durability. That would be proving a negative.

No you telling I have to prove that it doesn't is asking someone to prove a negative.

Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
You still haven't proven that without help Thanos can resist a TP like Onslaught.

Your own example shows that a gemless moondragon was capable of a psi-feat that Thanos was not

and one that Xavier who is weaker and only one part of Onslaught's power could do.

Originally posted by Lord S
[B]Yes I did, the Galactus example.