Lord Knightfa11
Restricted
why would we evolve to need two people to reproduce? thats not the fittest! why didn't we evolve so that we were all a-sexual?
How about the eye? this is natural? something that happens all by itself? An accident you say? something designed to focus light so that you can sense everything around you? How did the eye evolve? How did it start? a mutation that could sense light evolved so that you can clearly see everything around you? what made this mutation the fittest?
Laws of thermodynamics.
First law:
The entropy of an isolated system not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value at equilibrium.
For those of you who are keeping track, this is ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC LAW. Law=hypothesis-->testing-->theory--->law. This has been proven and reproven over and over again. Put meat in a jar and seal it, the meat is going to degenerate. Put a bunch of wood in the middle of a yard, and its going to rot. This basically says that everything is advancing to a state of chaos. Evolution simply can't occur because nature when left alone is not going to create life, its going to degenerate it. This means that the primordial ooze theory can't happen.
Complexity of a cell:
these are protozoa, widely considered to be one of the most basic single celled organisms in existence today. As you can see, it is not made as simply as they thought it could be created in the 1800's. you could have trillions of years of inanimate matter, and you are NEVER going to get a single celled organism, even if its the most muddy and varied ooze you could find.
A lot of evolution's ideas are disproved by simple common sense, such as the eye, an invention that naturally focuses light on a sensor to gauge perfectly ones surroundings.
Things like a bat evolving from an animal that resembles a shrew...
It is next to IMPOSSIBLE to prove a scientific theory. The germ THEORY (how you get sick) has not been proven, yet it has MOUNDS of evidence behind it. Same with almost every other facet of scientific study that is accepted, yet still considered a theory, including evolution. And proving something to your ignorant ass seems impossible, because unless it was written in the fictional work of the bible, you wont believe it.
The germ theory has been evidenced and tested. Evolution cannot be, and that is why it will not advance past the testing phase. Your most believeable piece of evidence is the archeopteryx.
^This is the best picture i can find of a factual archeopteryx ^
This is a factual picture of a veliciraptor.
This is an evolutionist's conceptual design of the archeopteryx:
As you can see, there are more similarities in the structure to a veliciraptor, it just has slightly longer arms. Here is a picture of a modern day bird's bone structure.
As you can see, the ribs on the Archeopteryx are very numerous, there is no bone that even gets close to representing the bird's breast bone, and the only thing that can be considered akin to the bird is the elongated arms. the arms don't even bend the same way on the archeopteryx, and indeed, it looks rather more like the veliciraptor. Unfortunately, some scientist decided to make the long arms and make them wings and put feathers on them... Suddenly this makes it a transitional fossil.
now put skin and muscles on this skeleton. you get a beast quite akin to a veliciraptor. This animal shows no characteristics close to a bird's.
Hitler was also INSANE, and by our moral code under the influence of several beings of a different dimension.
1. Flood Geology.
First and foremost, where did the water for the ‘flood’ come from? Where did it go? How did it fossilize the animals it drowned in the exact order that would provide evidence for evolution? Why would the heavier animals not all be at the bottom, rather than the mixture of sizes and kinds of animals that we have now? Why are some insect fossils found in layers lower than those of animals that won’t float?
One of my favorite theories for the flood (the flood is undebatable, a worldwide flood happened at one point or another, as all cultures have some sort of myth or legend about a worldwide flood. its part of the chinese religion, the Mayan religion, so we assume that it has not been made up by christians.) is that there was a firmament above the earth, just outside of the atmosphere. This firmament was made out of pure ice, and it created a greenhouse effect. The weight of the ice doubled the air pressure, which would be very beneficial to races, causing them to live for a long time, (1000+years before the deluge). When god decided to kill off all the assholes down here, the firmament collapsed, raining large chunks of ice on the earth. The water flooded the earth. there was also water underground that turned into geysers, etc. Mudslides (etc) trapped alot of the animals, keeping them from floating, and compressing them, creating fossils far beneath the earth's newly formed surface (Seriously, how do you think fossil fuel got underneath the oceans?). the ones allowed to float would have rotted and there would be no evidence of such. This sight: http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/dinofossils/Fossilhow.html describes what would have happened to animals trapped under mudslides from the flood. Eventually enough of the water from under ground's now hollow caverns collapsed, causing the ocean to recede, leaving 30% of the earth to be dry land.
This theory (once again, I'm not trying to pass it off as fact) explains alot of things that the bible doesn't explain.
Where did dinosaurs go? well, alot of them were very big, and used very tiny nostrils and lungs for their large size. Used to breathing oxygen twice as potent as before, these large animal's life span decreased to before breeding age. The ones that survived were hunted nigh to extinction. (where did stories of dragons and mythology of such come from?) there are some who have even seen possible surviving oceanic dinosaurs. Loch ness would be unexplainable in evolution's terms. It makes a lot more sense when you think that there maybe a few dinosaurs living in the caverns under that lake, and more sense when you say that they survived independently for 4000 years instead of 2 billion.
The problem is that evidence points the other way, and God would have no need to make it look like he was not part of the creation process. He could have made it irrefutably clear that he created the universe, and proven his existence to the closest scientific certainty. He hasn’t. We must either believe that god lied (impossible- goes against his characterwink or that he doesn’t exist (probable, because there is no positive evidence yet to be submitted.)
Since you fail to realize that the complexity of the universe could not have been an accident that created infinitely complex galaxies within galaxies within galaxies, apparently. Also, god refuses to directly interfere with us mortals so we are free to make our own choices.