Burning thought
Restricted
Originally posted by Becci
I assume you meant 3 and not 30.[b]Backup?!
Is that how you see it? You are more arrogant than I thought. So anyone that debate for Sargeras is my backup against your awesome debating skills, then?Realitycheck: They never came to my rescue, because I never had anything I needed to be rescued from. They are not my 'backup', they are merely people with opinions different from yours. Everything is not black and white, Burning Thought. Everyone doesnt team up against you, even though from where you sit I imagine you see it that way. You arent that awesome debater that can stand alone against entire crowds, even though you might think you are.
Realitycheck: You are a terrible debater, with crappy argumental strategies and an arrogance that makes Arthas seem humble. You point out and complain about usage of different fallacies when it suits you and use them yourself when it suits your character in question, ignorantly ignoring the fact that you are the same person that you complain many others to be. You completely burden everyone with requests of proof to completely insignificant points, most likely because you want to find whatever holes that might exist, while you yourself expect everyone to believe you because 'so is simply the case'.
Realitycheck: If you ever looked at Kain with as much critic as you look at every single other character that is against him, or other characters you speak in favor of in various battle threads on this forum, you would find a lot of holes in your bulletproof 'Kain is awesome'-wall. You are a smart kid, but your way of debating is terrible. You are narrowminded, and sees just about only what you want to see. You are merely too stubborn to realise that Kain is not even close to as powerful as your image of him is. Use that intelligence of yours to open your mind and reflect on Kain or whoever as well, rather than focuse it on tearing everything that oppose you down. [/B]
No 30
Probably, you need backup because tbh you dont usually do well againts me in debates, onyl Dark C and utrigos can counter me properly, otherwise you just give opinions that are from simple opionionated views, not in debatable views.
They are a form of backup, anyone on your side would be the backup, especially friends. oh but i do, have and have done for long before you came to this section of this forum have I deabted against hordes and usually beat them into silence.
Wow, ime being told ime terrible by a terrible debator herself, I dont use fallacies, if I do point them out please. Because it is simply the case, people belive some of the things i say because ive given proof of it before since many of the debators are old, and nitpicking proof points is the best way to shatter a debate, there is always something someone is hiding or cannot tell you that from a debating point of view can kill their argument, thats hwy ime a good debator, not "terrible", ive had several fairly good debates with people, including utrigos where we even settled a point civily, I can be a nice debator sometimes, or aggressive.
Then point out these holes Becci please do, because from my "narrowminded" point of view your ranting on about how terrible i am without providing anything yourself, showing any examples, your simply attacking in a way which although amusing are pointless without any major backing. Too stubborn to realise Kain is not as powerful? lol, against what opposition? your post right there is a constant reminder to me how weak many deabtors are in how they cannot even point out the merest clue to their ideal that ime wrong when I can backup most if not all what I say with something.
I can use it to tear apart and see into characters I know, and have known for a long time, its your job to use my "narrowmindedness" against me and actually beat me in a debate for once? Ranting saddity is neither required nor interesting.