Alright, I am tired of your assumptions and pretended knowledge of warcraft. Before I quit having this debate with you, there are some things I will point out that you can answer to if you like and hope someone else to respond to. If nothing else, and although, as Krasus said, "it is too much for hope for", you might learn something:
1. Here's a math fact for you: Nothing = Zero. So while the book stated 100, they could as well have stated 500 or more. The reason the number 100 were brought up, is because 100 dragons is a more decent amount in the warcraft universe. While 100 is an acceptable amount, 500 is a fictional amount. An illogical number. Azeroth could and did scrape together 100 dragons, but having 500 is impossible. Just like how they did not bring Kil'Jaeden, or any other powerful Burning Legion member into the 'fleas' example, they only brought up a 100 dragons rather than bringing up a higher amount. Because at the current situation, anything else was fictional to the Warcraft universe.
2. You are right. Archimonde, the one who crushed an adult dragon by grasping his fist is nothing but a flea compared to Sargeras. Keep in mind that the crushed dragon is blue, and resilient to magic.
3. How is it weak to be Sargeras when a hundred dragons is NOTHING to him (100*0=0)? When the unstoppable Demi-God slayer Archimonde is nothing but a flea? I do not know how you can call 100 dragons being nothing for weak. NOTHING is a limitless term in this sentence, meaning that all we know is that 100 dragons would just be nothing compared to him. This quote could, and if it was about Kain, by you, would be used to say that even a 1000 dragons would be pathetic, since dragons of high numbers has already been compared to as if nothing.
4. Sargeras is not indestructable, you are right. We have seen this by Brox Ax in action. And how exactly do you know that Brox's Ax would not penetrate Kain's shield? Exactly, you have no such proof and you can know no such thing. Brox's weapon is of immortal nature and defies what elsewise should be impossible. You are using Legacy of Kain logic, so there is nothing stopping me from using Warcraft logic. But you of course will decline this, and prove that you are hypocritic. Nah, you will admit no such thing now that I have spoiled everything, but that is EXACTLY how you debate. You are allowed to deny it, but any one person on this forum can confirm this. You use fictional logic from Kain's universe but decline fictional logic from other universes. You debate as if LoK is the center of logic and the judge of what is possible and not.
As always, you are being a high-quality, grade A, prime cut, pure, blind hypocritic. The Warcraft universe can destroy the immovable (And I am not only talking about Brox's Ax). If Kain was introduced to a blue dragon, his shield would never hold. If you say it would hold against a blue dragon dispel, you, again, will bring up how hypocritic you are. Sure, I know this post is twistable in my direction, but let me tell you this: Kain's shield is like a paladin's bubble. Spoken in quote, by narrators, by official sources and proven in game to be indestructable. The only reason Kain has never had his shield fail, is because LoK lack the components to budge it. Warcraft does not. There is no such thing as an immovable object. Only degrees of endurance and durability.
5. You really are not listening. Pyron is dwarfed in power, but dwarfes them in danger. I would love to see Pyron create time. I would love to see Pyron create the skies of a planet. I would love to see Pyron create sources of limitless power. I would love to see Pyron imprison the most powerful entities in the universe. I would love to see Pyron control the concept of magic. You really do not get it, do you? Pyron could never beat the Pantheon. The Pantheon would never beat him either, because they are not like that, but Pyron lack the means to destroy them. Aman'Thul alone could make the entire Pantheon safe from Pyron for an eternity. Eonar could bring fallen companions back to life whenever she so desire. Norgannon could create forcefields of massive magnitude. Pyron may be more dangerous than them, but he is not more powerful. He is dwarfed in actual power. He would crush anyone in a matter of direct combat though.
6. And Kain would be able to drain Sargeras.... how? I have already told you that characters far lesser than Sargeras has resisted both life and energy draining. This is even in canon, and not stupid gameplay. I can bring solid proof of this (I will not, since I have no intentions of responding to a possible response by you in this matter. Instead I will point you in the direction of War of the Ancients, Rise of the Horde and Sunwell Triology, where you will get example of both life drain and energy drain being resisted). But of course, since you will be using Kain logic, Sargeras can not possibly resist. You will completely blind your way past any proof of resistance that Warcraft characters can bring out against draining abilities, since Kain's powers are "absolute". Yet another hypocritic point of yours. While other characters would fail doing the same thing to Kain, Kain himself can do it to anyone he wishes with a snap of his fingers. And one thing above all: Kain, based on feats, is a pathetic caster compared to the majority of the significant casters in the Warcraft universe.
7. This show exactly how little you know of what you talk, and this is probably the reason why people that do know about Warcraft find it so frustrating to debate you. You, once again, have made things up because it sounds most logical to you that way. The Well never exploded. It imploded, just like the portal, and the portal was supposed to crush Sargeras while doing so, but did not. You do know what crushing and implosion means, dont you? Thats what I thought. There are very few characters that can say that they survived being in the center of an energy implosion, and while the walls by all logic should have crushed me, they did not, due to my durability.
8. This is interesting. Because as far as I recall, we have never gotten proof of it being larger than Jupiter. I also recall you have tried to get proof of this, but they have failed to provide it. Yet, now, here that you debate for Pyron against Sargeras, it is all of a sudden acceptable that the planet was larger than Jupiter. This is just another example of the person currently known as Hypocrit Burning Thought. You use loose grounds when it suits your argument. Since when have you blindly believed everything Dark-Jaxx have said? I'll tell you when. Since it suited you. When have you questioned everything Dark-Jaxx have said? When it was against the character you speak for. Yes, Pyron is large, but we have gotten no proof of him being Jupiter size or larger. So quit being the desperate anti-Sargeras boy and try see fact as they are, rather than how you want them to be.
9. And your at it again. "Pyron is more than anything in Warcraft. He is automaticly enough to destroy Sargeras", well guess what. If Pyron is more than anything in Warcraft, he is more than anything in LoK and he can automaticly destroy that as well. You will, as always, decline this of course. Be my guest. My words are spoken, and if he is more than all of Warcraft, he definately is more than all of LoK. Entities of Warcraft has shown far more incredible endurance, strength, magic and intelligence feats than anyone in LoK, so by default, Pyron can not only destroy Warcraft, but LoK. This is by your logic. Sounds reasonable, doesnt it? ... ... ... No, it really doesnt. Get real!